Examples of using Consequentialism in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
One form of negative consequentialism is negative utilitarianism.
Negative utilitarianism is thus a form of negative consequentialism.
Therefore, consequentialism is the philosophical antithesis of this theory.
Obviously, enormous amounts have been written about consequentialism and deontology.
From Dewey's perspective, consequentialism became converted into instrumentalism.
It is indefensible to the extent that its viability depends on the coherence of consequentialism.
However, consequentialism and virtue ethics need not be entirely antagonistic.
These four ethical principles are themselves largely derived from two more abstract ethical frameworks: consequentialism and deontology.
In this way it is similar to consequentialism, which some leaders of the movement explicitly endorse.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong interprets Bernard Gert's moral system as a"sophisticated form of negative objective universal public rule consequentialism.
Negative consequentialism is the version of consequentialism that focuses on reducing harms.
One solution to these debates would be for social researchers to develop a consistent, morally solid, andeasy-to-apply blend of consequentialism and deontology.
Consequentialism purports to judge an evil act to be moral if its overall consequences are good.
To see the differences between standard forms of consequentialism and negative consequentialism we can consider the case of negative utilitarianism.
Consequentialism is broader than utilitarianism in that consequentialism can say that the value of outcomes depend on other things than well-being; for example, justice, fairness, and equality.
Since nonhuman animals are capable of suffering,according to negative consequentialism it is morally unacceptable to harm animals or cause them any kind of suffering for human benefit.
Both consequentialism and deontology offer important ethical insight, but each can be taken to absurd extremes.
Moral absolutism stands in contrast to other categories of normative ethical theories such as consequentialism, which holds that the morality(in the wide sense) of an act depends on the consequences or the context of the act.
Finally, consequentialism and deontology are ethical frameworks that have been developed by philosophers for hundreds of years.
The consequentialist argument is analyzed according to the various theories that underlie it, such as utilitarianism and pragmatism, especially, in a separate chapter,according to neil maccormick¿s theory, that offers an essentially legal consequentialism.
A specific type of consequentialism is utilitarianism, which says that the consequences that matter are those that affect well-being.
Anderson's research covers topics in social philosophy, political philosophy and ethics, including: democratic theory, equality in political philosophy and American law, racial integration, the ethical limits of markets, theories of value andrational choice(alternatives to consequentialism and economic theories of rational choice), the philosophies of John Stuart Mill and John Dewey, and feminist epistemology and philosophy of science.
Negative consequentialism is a version of the ethical theory consequentialism, which is"one of the major theories of normative ethics.
Within this broad perspective we can counter tendencies to pragmatism and consequentialism, so prevalent today, which engage only with the symptoms and effects of conflicts, social fragmentation, and moral ambiguity, rather than their roots.
In practice, negative consequentialism is a theory that generally protects the most vulnerable and opposes their exploitation for the benefit of others if it results in their suffering.
Much more has been written explicitly about negative utilitarianism than directly about negative consequentialism, although since negative utilitarianism is a form of negative consequentialism, everything that has been written about negative utilitarianism is by definition about a specific(utilitarian) version of negative consequentialism. .
Negative consequentialism differs from other versions of consequentialism by giving greater weight in moral deliberations to what is bad(e.g. suffering or injustice) than what is good e.g. happiness or justice.
According to negative consequentialism, the need to reduce suffering as much as possible must always take priority over anything else.
Like other versions of consequentialism, negative consequentialism holds that moral right and wrong depend only on the value of outcomes.
The ideas behind effective altruism, such as consequentialism, have been present in practical ethics for a long time and have been reflected in the writings of philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Peter Singer, and Peter Unger.