Examples of using Mean differences in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Mean differences and standard deviations were calculated.
Also, the Games-Howell test showed significant mean differences in p.
Testing Mean Differences for Qualitative Explanatory Factors.
Pooled results were analyzed using standardized mean differences SMD.
Mean differences between groups were analyzed by the Tukey test.
People also translate
Continuous variables results were expressed as mean differences MD with 95%CI.
Mean differences between actual and estimated measures were significant p.
Continuous measures of outcome were combined using standardised mean differences.
The mean differences between the instruments should be the closest as possible.
Continuous data were analysed using standardised mean differences(SMD) with 95% CI.
It was observed that the mean differences in the group with normal hearing were between -0.3 and 12 dB HL.
In continuing the analysis, we calculated the T test for the identification of mean differences between the fans of Grêmio and Internacional.
Were performed studies of mean differences by student t test, anova and tukey's honestly significant differen.
It could be seen that both for the left side andfor the right side, there were statistically significant mean differences between the men and women for the five variables.
Mean differences of PA, TMC, WMC and SA were 4.48 min, 17.8 MET, 25.8 MET, and 1.35 min, respectively.
The data have been shown as mean differences and standard deviations of the difference. .
Mean differences between the sexes were checked using Cohen's d in order to calculate the effect size.
Their validation showed good to satisfactory fit, with mean differences regarding the shoreline of 5m up to maximum of 15m.
The mean differences and ICCs were calculated using 95% confidence intervals CIs.
For RCTs we calculated relative risks(RR) or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals 95% CI.
The mean differences in the group with severe to profound flat sensorineural hearing loss ranged between -0.40 and -8.5 dB.
This region differed from the others with regard to comparing the mean differences in rates in the municipalities over the period, according to healthcare macroregion p< 0.001.
The mean differences were between 1.4 and 7.5 dB lower those obtained in international studies conducted with adult population.
Considering cephalometric variables,the effect size d was also calculated by the model proposed by Cohen for the mean differences of two independent groups.
Overall mean differences in total knowledge, and mean item scores were compared in the Brazilian vs Canadian samples.
Meta-analyses were performed using relative risk for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean differences for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals.
Tests of mean differences and proportion can be calculated by estimating a distribution for each category of the group expected to be compared.
We evaluated interventions using mean differences(MD) or standardized mean differences(SMD) and 95% confidence intervals 95% CI.
However, mean differences were significant for reports about the age when bottle feeding and semisolid food consumption started.
Besides the significance tests, the mean differences between the two groups, with the respective confidence intervals Figure 5, were also calculated.