Examples of using Single commit in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Figure 3-1. Single commit repository data.
A cherry-pick in Git is like a rebase for a single commit.
This way you can change a single commit, for example to fix a typo in a docstring.
This section outlines the various ways you can refer to a single commit.
On April 6, 2016,Nishikawa released the single"Committed RED/ Inherit the Force.
If you want to create a deeper hierarchy then it is simpler to create a folder structure on disk first and import it in a single commit, like this.
You end up with a single commit- the second commit replaces the results of the first.
It's also possible to take a series of commits and squash them down into a single commit with the interactive rebasing tool.
When you save that, you have a single commit that introduces the changes of all three previous commits. .
In this case, the process of rebasing"rewrites" the history retaining the same changes in code,while"collapses" all those changes in a single commit.
So, if you want to make a single commit from these three commits, you make the script look like this.
If you want to create a deeper hierarchy then it is simpler to create a folder structure on disk first and import it in a single commit, like this.
If your fix is more than a single commit, you should put the fix on an appropriately named branch.
For example, if you develop a new feature on a branch and then merge that branch back to trunk,the feature development will show up on the trunk log as a single commit for the merge, even though there may have been 1000 commits during branch development.
You may want to use rebase-i to squash your work down to a single commit, or rearrange the work in the commits to make the patch easier for the maintainer to review- see Chapter 6 for more information about interactive rebasing.
For example, if you develop a new feature on a branch and then merge that branch back to trunk,the feature development will show up on the trunk log as a single commit for the merge, even though there may have been 1000 commits during branch development.
After these three commands, you end up with a single commit- the second commit replaces the results of the first.
So, after you push it up,it will look like a single commit that squashed in all the work of another branch under a single commit.
You can pretty easily see what files have been modified in a single commit with the--name-only option to the git log command mentioned briefly in Chapter 2.
Is the pull request a single squashed commit with a message that follows our commit message format?
MFC with: If the commit should be merged together with a previous one in a single MFC commit(for example, where this commit corrects a bug in the previous change), specify the corresponding revision number.
Running dcommit on a branch with merged history works fine, except that when you look at your Git project history,it hasn't rewritten either of the commits you made on the experiment branch- instead, all those changes appear in the SVN version of the single merge commit.