Examples of using Two groups were compared in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Two groups were compared.
At six months, the two groups were compared.
The two groups were compared at the end of the study.
There were no differences regarding gender andsocioeconomic distribution when the two groups were compared.
The two groups were compared using the Student t-test.
Peripheral vascular disease andprevious smoking also showed significant results when the two groups were compared.
The two groups were compared according to the independent variables.
In addition, variables that presented values of p< 0.2 when the two groups were compared were included in the model.
First, the two groups were compared regarding their exercise tolerance 6MWT.
Similarly, there was no significant difference in the values of%ATI/g of the left liver lobe when the two groups were compared p=0.083.
The scores of the two groups were compared for statistical purposes.
The autonomic variables are shown as median± interquartile difference and the two groups were compared by the Mann-Whitney test.
The results for the two groups were compared by the Student t test.
Two groups were compared¿case and control¿to evaluate the discriminant construct validity.
The differences between two groups were compared by unpaired t-test.
The two groups were compared considering weight, height, age and body mass index BMI.
The data demographic and clinical of the members of the two groups were compared by applying the chi-square test or fisher's p, with p< 0.05 significance level.
The two groups were compared for the various demographic variables, as per depicted on Table 1.
For independent samples, two groups were compared using Student's t-test.
The two groups were compared according to the collected variables in pre operatory, to avoid biases of confusion.
Baseline clinical andlaboratory characteristics of the two groups were compared using logistic regression analysis for categorical variables and analysis of covariance for continuous variables.
The two groups were compared using the methods described below.
All answers from the two groups were compared by means of the Equality of Two Proportions test with a significance level of 5.
The two groups were compared by using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney test, when appropriate.
The means of the two groups were compared through the statistical test one way anova, at a significance level of 5.
The two groups were compared by means of the t Student test for the parametric variables ages.
When more than two groups were compared, Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparisons was used.
The two groups were compared in relation to EPDS score, age, level of schooling, number of gestations, and marital status.
The characteristics of the two groups were compared using the Wilcoxon test, with the level of significance defined as p< 0.05.
Two groups were compared, and the conventional group consisting of physical therapy techniques with inspiratory encourager and manual maneuvers to re-expansion.
