Examples of using Using standardized instruments in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Sociodemographic and clinical information were obtained using standardized instruments.
Using standardized instruments minimizes the influence of subjective factors which may result in differences in data collection by the interviewees.
Ideally, the presence andseverity of symptoms should be recorded using standardized instruments.
Patients were evaluated using standardized instruments that included: ybocs, dybocs, beck d, beck a, scid, and the brazilian version of the quality of life questionnaire sf-36, v.2.
Further studies can compare this prevalence upon admission with prevalence rates identified during the rehabilitation program,besides evaluating other factors that can be associated with bowel dysfunction, using standardized instruments.
However, various precautions were taken to avoid biases, using standardized instruments and extensive training of the field team.
Consequently to evaluate the narrative by using standardized instruments turns to be of great importance to assist in the identification of the processes that need to be worked with the children that have language disorders clarck and kamhi, 2010.
Data collection for the original study on food insecurity occurred between the months of May andOctober 2011 through direct household interviews with the head of each household, using standardized instruments, pre-coded and tested in a pilot study.
On the other hand,studies on food intake in the postpartum period using standardized instruments such as the 24-hour dietary recall and the Food Frequency Questionnaire FFQ could not be found in international databases.
Because there is still no consensus about which criteria validate qualitative studies,some EBR researchers recommend using a systematized methodology evaluation using standardized instruments, such as the CASP, for qualitative studies.
In this review the tests used to evaluate olfactory function in the majority were concerned to make a quantitative analysis using standardized instruments, which suggests a concern with the results presented, as is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of an intervention technique, but there are no tests to evaluate the taste function tests and specific methods of rehabilitation.
These consequences are well studied and grounded on research, which emphasize the relevance of developing andimplementing protocols of risk evaluation; using standardized instruments and clinical rationale; and, preventing these lesions according to international guidelines.
The tests used to evaluate olfactory function in the majority were concerned to make a quantitative analysis using standardized instruments, which suggests a concern with the results presented, as is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of an intervention technique.
In addition, clear language should be used; with concise information; without abbreviations/jargons; without interruptions;without parallel conversations; using standardized instruments and technological resources; and involving interaction among the professionals to clarify doubts, discussion and reflection on the patient.
Nearly all of the studies included in the present review used standardized instruments in order to assess health-related quality of life, and the SGRQ was the instrument that was most commonly used. .
One systematic review showed that health professionals used standardized instruments to identify the smoking profile, nicotine dependence, craving, abstinence and motivation for cessation, in order to help them to intervene in the health education process in these patients.
In quantitative section, it was collected and examined demographic andepidemiological data for participants characterization and used standardized instruments, kahn and goldfarb mental status questionnaire; katz index of independence in actives of daily living- adl and the lawton and brody instrumental activities of daily living¿iadl scale.
Moreover, we need studies which include special populations and community samples of psychiatric patients; studies which include a non-psychiatric sample as control group, studies that specify the types of crimes and the contexts in which such crimes occur,studies which use standardized instruments to assess victimization and studies which include the mentally ill living in other cultures, specially in developing countries.
In this study we investigated psychopathology on subjects who do not present an axis I disorder according to psychological autopsy assessments using standardized instrument procedures.
Finally, this survey did not use standardized instruments to evaluate health problems, psychological suffering or QoL, only direct questions about these aspects, with five response choices.
In the present study, the prevalence of MH rated as"fair, poor orvery poor" was only 18%. However, it should be noted that this survey did not use standardized instruments to identify psychological suffering.
Data extraction from each study included in this review was conducted independently by two reviewers R.A.S. and F.M.S. using a standardized instrument.
The use of standardized instruments, such as the SF-36-Health Survey19, although it is geared for adults, has also been applied in child-adolescent cancer survivors.
International guidelines for wound treatment recommend a minimum of weekly evaluation, using a standardized instrument that enables monitoring of the healing process.
The author mentions the importance of the use of standardized instruments, highlighting the International Physical Activity Questionnaire IPAQ, translated and validated for the Brazilian Portuguese.
In this study adolescents diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were compared to their siblings and adolescents with typical development(controls)regarding their resilience levels using a standardized instrument.
This apparent dissonance highlights the importance of further research on poor sleep quality with more detailed questions or, preferably, with the use of standardized instruments, since a single question can lead to a distorted assessment of sleep quality.
As previously noted, the use of standardized instruments- such as the scales presented here- would answer to the demands of the new forms of governing of dangerousness, which has in the idea of risk one of its main foundations.
The second, termed"relativist," maintains that it is impossible to use standardized instruments in different cultural contexts and proposes that only those developed locally should be used.
Due to the scarcity of validated instruments, especially in Brazil, to quantify speech alterations specifically in hearing impaired children,we question the use of standardized instruments to measure phonological alterations in children with normal hearing that could also be used to evaluate children hearing impaired.