Examples of using Errors of law in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The errors of law affecting the judgment under appeal.
The Commission submits,the General Court committed two errors of law.
It should cover errors of law and errors of fact.
By contrast, the second andthird specific criticisms invoke errors of law.
The fifth ground alleges errors of law concerning the agreement with Lupin.
In that last respect,the appellants submit that the Court of First Instance committed errors of law by, in particular.
First Plea- Errors of law and/or a manifest error or lack of reasoning on refusal to.
The Council will demonstrate that the Contested Judgment is vitiated by several errors of law affecting its validity.
Although those judgments are vitiated by errors of law, those errors did not have any impact in the present cases.
According to the Commission, paragraph 58 of the judgment under appeal is on that point vitiated by errors of law.
The General Court found that OHIM had made errors of law concerning the protection of the earlier rights and the use of the appellation concerned.
By the seven grounds of appeal put forward by the appellants, some of which are divided into a number of parts,the appellants allege errors of law in that in the judgment under appeal the Court of First Instance.
Second ground of appeal: errors of law and procedure in the contested order when it holds that there is no longer an interest in bringing proceedings.
Intervening in support of DTS,Telefónica further submits that the Commission made other errors of law in interpreting the concept of‘aid' within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
First ground of appeal: errors of law in the contested order when it holds that there is no longer a purpose to the action, and therefore no need to adjudicate.
Impala suggests first of all that the fifth ground of appeal represents an attempt by the appellants to reopen the factual assessments made by the Court of First Instance,rather than alleging errors of law.
The third plea alleges errors of law in the application of the concept of restriction of competition by object within the meaning of Article 101(1) TFEU.
Thus, even if the appeal were wholly successful, according to Impala it could not result in the judgment under appeal being set aside,because the findings of the Court of First Instance contained in paragraph 528 of the judgment as regards further errors of law in the first clearance decision would still stand.
Second, examination of the appeal shows that the applicant states precisely the errors of law vitiating the judgment under appeal and explains in detail the reasons why that judgment should be set aside.
Consequently, without it being necessary to adjudicate either on the appellants' claims alleging distortion of the evidence or on the question whether the Court of First Instance in fact substituted its own economic assessment in the judgment under appeal for that of the Commission,it must be held that at least that part of the judgment under appeal dealing with the examination of the arguments alleging the existence of manifest errors of assessment is vitiated by errors of law.
The second ground, raised by the Commission, the Council and the United Kingdom,alleges errors of law with regard to the level of intensity of judicial review determined in the judgment under appeal.
The second plea alleges errors of law by the General Court in assessing the content and objectives of the licence agreement as an incentive for Krka to accept the restrictions of the settlement agreement.
Secondly, the Commission considers that paragraph 414 of the judgment under appeal, which sets out the approach followed by the Court of First Instance in paragraphs 415 to 457 of the judgment to a large body of evidence,reveals a number of related errors of law concerning, among other things, the probative value of the evidence submitted in response to the statement of objections.
Instead, the Court has to decide whether the Court of First Instance for its part made any errors of law in the judgment under appeal when it reviewed the reasons given for the clearance decision, and in particular whether the Court of First Instance based its review on correct or on excessively strict criteria.
B- Infringement of EU law- Errors of law- Breach of the principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and of legal certainty- Error in the characterisation of the legal nature of the facts, distortion of the facts and of the evidence.
In support of their appeals, the appellants put forward three pleas in law, by which they seek to show that the General Court committed errors of law and failed to fulfil its obligation to state reasons in holding that the statement at issue did not display, in their regard, the characteristics of an act whose annulment may be sought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU.
Therefore, the judgment is affected by errors of law in the interpretation and application of established case law of the Court, it creates legal uncertainty, and affects the margin of discretion which the Commission has in setting fines on an undertaking for having violated Article 101 TFEU.
That requirement is not satisfied by an appeal which seeks not to identify errors of law allegedly vitiating the reasoning of the Court of First Instance in the judgment under appeal but rather, by repeating arguments relied on at first instance and putting forward supposed new evidence.
Infringement of EU law by the General Court- Errors of law and errors in the characterisation of the legal nature of the facts and the evidence by the General Court- Discriminatory and, by extension, fumus persecutionis- Infringement of the principles of protection of legitimate expectations and of legality.
The first plea is made up of three limbs alleging different errors of law committed by the Court of First Instance: first, with respect to the scope and applicability of Articles 4(c) CS and 67 CS; secondly, with respect to the extent of the Commission powers under Article 95 CS; and thirdly.