Examples of using Baf in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Bioaccumulation factors BAF.
BAF>5000 in aquatic organisms Mansouri 2012, He 2012.
Common problems with the BAF file.
The BAF(= level in mussel/level in SPM) for PentaBDE was 1.8.
The relationships between BCF and BAF are examined.
BAF of benthic organism is expressed as biota-sediment accumulation factor BSAF.
For the fish Cottus cognatus a BAF of 17,360 L/kg was found.
Business processes are modeled graphically with the Ha-VIS Business Application Framework BAF.
A wide range of bioaccumulation factors(BAF) for alpha-HCH has been reported in several studies.
A logBAF>3.7 corresponds to BAF>5000 He et al. 2012, Environment Canada 2010 a.
In the evaluation done by Canada the relationship between logBAF and BAF is explained more thoroughly Environment Canada 2010 a.
Evaluated BAF values of 9,260 and 250,000 L/kg are available for crustaceans and value of 17,360 L/kg for fish.
Measured data from aquatic species show BCF or BAF values>5,000 L/kg, clearly fulfilling the criteria in Annex D.
Evaluated BAF values of 9,260 and 250,000 L/kg are available for crustaceans and a value of 17,360 L/kg for fish.
In the evening 11 till 12 o'clock and many times during the night it made nice sounds 10 to 12 times quickly after another like Baf Baf.
On the basis of measured BCF and BAF values of>5,000 L/kg it is concluded that HCBD has a potential for bioaccumulation.
On the other hand, bioaccumulation was not observed in a recent laboratory experiment where apple snails were dietary exposed to BDE-209 reported BAF was.
In a report(The Netherlands, 2012)three studies were examined with BAF values between 6,760 L/kg lipid- 575,000 L/kg lipid.
The BAF represents the bioaccumulation of chemicals in an organism by all routes of exposure, including by dietary and ambient sources.
Using empirical KOW data and assuming no metabolism,the Gobas BAF model for fish estimated BAF values greater than 5000 for all possible SCCPs.
In this study BAF values(normalised to 5% lipids) for the crustaceans Mysis relicta and Pontoporeia affinis of 9,260 L/kg and 250,000 L/kg were found.
Due to the properties of PFOS, which binds preferentially to proteins in non-lipid tissues,application of numeric criteria for BCF or BAF, which are derived based on consideration of lipid-partitioning substances, may be inappropriate.
However, the correlation between BCF and BAF is not clear. See Appendix 5: The interrelation between BCFs and BAFs data of existing POPs and POPs candidates.
Other studies report bioconcentration factors(log BCF) ranging from 2.26 in shrimp to 3.85 in rainbow trout in early life stages on lipid basis and4.3 in zooplankton and a bioaccumulation factor(log BAF) up to 4.1 in rainbow trout Mackay et al, 1997.
The bioaccumulation factors(BAF) for spray-drift and run-off routes were estimated as: BAF total radioactivity ca.1000; BAF endosulfan-sulfate 4600-5000 spray-drift.
However, the BAF was calculated as ratio of concentration in worms and the pore water concentration instead of, as recommend by the OECD test guideline, the concentration of the test substance in the sediment.
Bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms can be expressed in the form of a bioaccumulation factor(BAF), which is the ratio of the chemical concentration in the organism(CB), expressed as a whole body fresh weight value, to that in water, ideally under steady state conditions(Cw): BAF CB/Cw.
The bunker surcharge(BAF) is charged per(l/m= commencing metre of unit type) on all Scandlines routes and adjusted according to latest development of North European fuel oil prices and rate of exchange USD/EUR on a monthly base.
As stated in IPCS(1994)observed bioaccumulation factors(BAF) based on wet weight in plankton, crustaceans, molluscs, insects and fish in surface waters are comparable to those observed in the laboratory and range from 33 to 11,700 L/kg.
In the same way, an average log BAF of 2.94 in invertebrate species andan average log BAF of 3.80 in vertebrate species can be calculated from other studies Oliver et al., 1988, Chevreuil et al., 1991, Hartley et al., 1983, Caquet et al., 1992.