Examples of using Coe-acfc in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
CoE-ACFC made similar observations.
The Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities(CoE-ACFC) stated that persons belonging to national minorities were generally well-represented in elected bodies at the local level.
CoE-ACFC made similar recommendations.
In 2009, the Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe(CoE-ACFC) noted with satisfaction that the Ombudsman regularly addressed cases related to racism and discrimination.
CoE-ACFC expressed concern that some media were fuelling intolerance, and sometimes hatred.
Equal Rights Trust(ERT), JS2, Joint Submission 3(JS3), HRIC/CIDO, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe(CoE-CoM) andthe Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities(CoE-ACFC) made similar recommendation.
Furthermore, CoE-ACFC found that very few cases of racially-motivated offences had been brought to courts.
In June 2009, the Council of Europe Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities(CoE-ACFC) noted that, under Article 31 of the Constitution, the principle of equality before the law only applied to citizens and that the protection of the rights of foreigners is only ensured through international treaties and on the basis of reciprocity.
CoE-ACFC noted that ACIDI was placed directly under the responsibility of the Prime Minister which brought into question its independence.
CoE-Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention(CoE-ACFC) recommended that Sweden remove the requirement that children have"basic knowledge" of their national minority language in order to receive mother tongue instruction in this language as part of their compulsory schooling; and strengthen efforts to address the lack of minority language teachers.
CoE-ACFC reiterated its concern about the reported lack of effective implementation of many elements of the Action Plan for the Roma for 2007- 2010.
CoE-ACFC recommended ensuring that the distinction between"autochthonous" and"non-autochthonous" Roma no longer results in practice in any differentiated treatment.
CoE-ACFC stated that cases of harassment, misconduct and abuse against persons belonging to ethnic minorities, especially the Roma, continued to be reported.
CoE-ACFC and CoE-CM stated that further efforts are needed to ensure equal opportunities in access to quality education for children belonging to all groups.
CoE-ACFC noted that the effectiveness of remedies against discrimination were hampered by the complexity of the system and that cases before the ACIDI were often protracted.
CoE-ACFC encouraged the Government to take further awareness-raising measures to highlight the role of schools in promoting mutual respect and understanding.
CoE-ACFC was concerned by the fact that the level of participation of persons belonging to minorities in all fields of the State administration and public services remained low.
CoE-ACFC recommended that the Government combat the dissemination of stereotypes or intolerant speech by the media and prosecute and sanction cases of hate speech.
CoE-ACFC and CoE-CM stated that further efforts are needed to combat difficulties faced by foreign nationals in certain sectors, including housing and employment.
Furthermore, CoE-ACFC was concerned by the fact that the Roma were rarely represented in elected bodies, which was also the case for persons belonging to numerically smaller minorities.
CoE-ACFC noted that the anti-discrimination legislation and provisions in the Criminal Code dealing with racially-motivated offences seemed to be applied rarely by the courts.
According to CoE-ACFC, despite the existence of the specific autonomy status granted to Gagauzia, more resolute efforts need to be made to preserve and develop the Gagauz language and cultural heritage.
CoE-ACFC and CoE-CM indicated that instances of xenophobia and intolerance against persons of different ethnic origin and religion, notably against Muslims and persons of Turkish origin, are still reported.
CoE-ACFC noted that children belonging to the Hungarian minority did not have adequate opportunities to learn the Hungarian language in schools with instruction in the Slovak language located in ethnically-mixed areas.
CoE-ACFC affirmed in 2011 that substantial improvements are needed to ensure effective protection against discrimination, and in particular, access to effective remedies for potential victims of discrimination.
CoE-Commissioner and CoE-ACFC noted the lack of opportunities for Roma children to attend pre-school education which affects negatively their acquisition of the Macedonian language and jeopardises their future education.
CoE-ACFC was concerned that this situation does not provide a sufficient legal basis for the enjoyment of the rights of immigrants living in Liechtenstein, even though these persons represent a substantial part of the total population.
CoE-ACFC and CoE-CM, however, expressed concern that the legal framework pertaining to the fight against discrimination still needs to be improved, including through the development of a comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation.
CoE-ACFC noted the inclusion of the shifted burden of proof in the law, while JS2 noted that, contrary to this principle, the party claiming violation of the right to equality is obliged to provide evidence to justify his or her claim.
CoE-ACFC found that there was no comprehensive policy that would address the multiple causes of Roma and Sinti marginalisation in a number of fields and it considered that the authorities should elaborate such a policy in consultation with the Roma and Sinti organisations.