Examples of using Decide without delay in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Such authority shall decide without delay upon the lawfulness and necessity of detention.
Any person arrested or detained shall have theright to take proceedings before a court, which shall decide without delay on the legality of the arrest.
To take proceedings before a court, in order thatthat court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the detention is not lawful(art. 14 of the Constitution);
The authors claim a violation of article 9, paragraph 4, because they were deprived of the right to takeproceedings before a court, in order that the court may decide without delay on the legality of their detention.
Right to bring proceedings before a court, in order thatthat court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of the detention and order release if the detention is not lawful Covenant, art. 9, para. 4.
Furthermore, the Committee is concerned at the fact that persons deprived of their liberty do not have the right to take proceedings before a court so that it may decide without delay on the lawfulness of their detention art. 9 of the Covenant.
Mr. LALLAH pointed out that the Committee would have to decide without delay where to place Hong Kong(Special administrative region) on the list of States parties whose reports were due, since the territory was no longer a dependency of the United Kingdom.
Article 5(4) further provides that a person who is deprived of his liberty is entitled to take proceedings before a court, in order thatthat court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the detention is unlawful.
Article 16, paragraph 8, provides for the right of all migrant workers and members of their families who are deprived of their liberty by arrest or detention to take proceedings before a court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of their detention.
Anyone who is deprived of his liberty shall be entitled to recourse to a competent court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his arrest or detention and order his release if the arrest or detention is unlawful.
While welcoming the abolition of the death penalty, the Group recalls that, however praiseworthy the Government's intentions might have been in that regard, that in no way relieved it of the obligation to bring the case of Tek Nath Rizal before a judicial or other authority as promptly as possible, as required by law, so thatthat authority could decide without delay on the lawfulness of and need for the detention.
It recommended that Mali supplement its legislation to conform it to article 9 of the ICCPR,which requires that a court decide without delay on the lawfulness of detention in custody and that it supervise the conditions of such custody.
It appears from the above allegations, which, it may be recalled, the Government of Israel did not refute despite the opportunity given to it to do so, that Wissam Rafeedie and Majid Isma'il Al-Talahmeh, irrespective of the nature and motives of the accusations against them, are being denied their right to take proceedings before a court, in order thatthat court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of their detention.
To respect and promote the right of anyone deprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention to bring proceedings before court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if the detention is not lawful, in accordance with their international obligations;
The State party should revise its criminal procedure legislation andintroduce a system that ensures that all detainees are as a matter of course brought promptly before a judge who will decide without delay on the lawfulness of the detention.
Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings before a court, in order thatthat court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if his detention is not lawful.
The former Commission on Human Rights in its resolution 1992/35 called on all States that had not yet done so to do establish a procedure such as habeas corpus in order for all persons deprived of their liberty to institute proceedings before a court so thatthe court may decide without delay the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if detention is found to be unlawful.
The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 20/16, encourages all States to"respect and promote the right of anyone deprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention to bring proceedings before court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if the detention is not lawful, in accordance with their international obligations" A/HRC/RES/20/16, para. 6 d.
The equivalents of amparo and habeas corpus are also found in this Convention. Under article 7, paragraph 6,"anyone who is deprived of his liberty shall be entitled to recourse to a competent court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his arrest or detention and order his release if the arrest or detention is unlawful.
Paragraph 4 of article 9 entitles anyone who is deprived of liberty by arrest or detention to take proceedings before a court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of the detention and order release if the detention is not lawful.
Paragraph 4 states:“Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings before a court, in order thatthat court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the detention is not lawful”.
Article 14, paragraph 6, of the Arab Charter on Human Rights(2004) guarantees that"anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest ordetention shall be entitled to petition a competent court in order that it may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his arrest or detention and order his release if the arrest or detention is unlawful.
The resolution 1992/35 adopted by former Human Rights Commission on 28 February 1992 called expressly on all States to establish a procedure such as habeas corpus in order for all persons deprived of their liberty to institute proceedings before a court so thatthe court may decide without delay the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if detention is found to be unlawful.
Resolution 1992/35, adopted by the former Human Rights Commission on 28 February 1992, also called on all States to establish a procedure such as habeas corpus in order for all persons deprived of their liberty to institute proceedings before a court so thatthe court may decide without delay the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if the detention is found to be unlawful.
The former Commission on Human Rights, in its resolution 1992/35 of 28 February 1992, called on all States that had not yet done so to establish a procedure, such as habeas corpus, in order for all persons deprived of their liberty to be able to institute proceedings before a court so thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if detention is found to be unlawful.
Pursuant to the Human Rights Council resolution 20/16, the Working Group has initiated preparations concerning the draft basic principles and guidelines on remedies and procedures on the right of anyone deprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention, to bring proceedings before court in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if the detention is not lawful.
The present report, submitted pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 20/16, provides an overview of the national, regional and international laws, regulations and practices on the right of anyone deprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention to bring proceedings before court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if the detention is not lawful.
Reference is made to resolution 1992/35 adopted by former Human Rights Commission on 28 February 1992, which called on all States that had not yet done so to establish a procedure such as habeas corpus in order for all persons deprived of their liberty to institute proceedings before a court so thatthe court might decide without delay the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if detention was found to be unlawful.
The Working Group refers to resolution 1992/35 of the former United Nations Human Rights Commission, calling on all States that have not yet done so to establish a procedure such as habeas corpus in order for all persons deprived of their liberty to institute proceedings before a court so thatthe court may decide without delay the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if detention is found to be unlawful.
The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention recalled that it was mandated by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 20/16 to draft basic principles and guidelines on remedies and procedures on"the right of anyone deprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention to bring proceedings before court, in order thatthe court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his or her detention and order his or her release if the detention is not lawful.
