Examples of using Expelled alien in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
State capable of receiving an expelled alien.
The deported or expelled alien may be prohibited from entering the Republic of Belarus for a period of 1 to 10 years.
His delegation could also support draft article H1 on the right of an unlawfully expelled alien to return to the expelling State.
Any expelled alien who is found on Italian territory shall be punished by imprisonment of one to four years.
In some cases a representative of the Belgian Embassy will go to the airport to monitor an operation to make sure that the expelled alien is properly received.
People also translate
This also applies if the expelled alien has a residence permit granted pursuant to section 7 of the Aliens Act asylum.
Turning to the topic"Expulsion of aliens",he pointed out that States other than the State of nationality might be willing to accept the expelled alien.
The right of return of an unlawfully expelled alien is also recognized in Romanian legal practice, as indicated by Romania's response to the Commission's questionnaire.
The Return Directive does not deal directly with the right of an unlawfully expelled alien to return to the expelling State.
This also applies if the expelled alien holds a residence permit for Denmark under section 7 of the Aliens Act asylum.
A State may remove or escort to the border(1) an alien who requests or agrees to depart voluntarily; or(2)a family member who wishes to depart with the expelled alien.
Protests lodged by the expelled alien with Syrian diplomatic and consular missions abroad are not a satisfactory solution in terms of the Covenant.
Concerning paragraph 3 of the draft article, any necessary distinction between a State that had not consented to admit an expelled alien into its territory and a State that had refused to do so should be clarified.
However, if the expelled alien has been imposed a penalty pursuant to the Norwegian Criminal Code both the transit State(s) and the country of destination will be notified of the return through the INTERPOL system.
Thus, the expelling State must adhere to more rigorous standards in determining the nationality of an expelled alien who was challenging his presumed nationality with the full cooperation of the receiving State.
While the point was made that expulsion to the State of embarkation was a common practice that should be mentioned in the draft articles,the view was also expressed that the State of embarkation has no legal obligation to receive the expelled alien.
Her delegation supported the view that an expelled alien should be allowed to return to the expelling State, subject to its immigration laws.
In this regard, the Commission is of the view that the expelling State, while retaining a margin of appreciation in the matter, should take into consideration, as far as possible,the preferences expressed by the expelled alien for the purposes of determining the State of destination.
Draft article 25 set out the obligation of the States through which an expelled alien might transit to protect the human rights of that alien in conformity with their obligations under international law.
This distinction is not altogether clear, however, inasmuch as under Act No. 9 of 10 January 1980, for example, reconduction to the frontier is regarded simply as a means of enforcing expulsion measures;section 6 of that law provides that"an expelled alien may be conducted to the frontier.
Some members considered that draft article H1 offered a balance between the right of an unlawfully expelled alien to return to the expelling State and the latter's legitimate interest in preserving public order and national security.
The expelled alien held in a special area at an airport, port or land frontier post while waiting to be placed on board a plane, ship or vehicle is already expelled from the legal standpoint, which does not alter the obligation to respect the dignity and the fundamental rights attached to the alien as a human being.
In November 2011, during the discussion in the Sixth Committee at the sixty-sixth session of the General Assembly, the representative of Malaysiareiterated her delegation's position, which was similar:"an expelled alien should be allowed to return to the expelling State, subject to its immigration laws.
In draft article E1(State of destination of expelled aliens), she failed to see the reason for the restriction of return to the State of nationality, since the expelled alien might wish to travel to another State consenting to receive him or her.
On the right of return to the expelling State(draft article H1), the Special Rapporteur showed, in the second addendum to his sixth report, that several States, including Belarus, Germany, Malaysia, Malta and the Netherlands,recognized the right of an unlawfully expelled alien to return to the expelling State.
As for the difference between a State that has not consented to admit an expelled alien to its territory and a State that refuses to do so, that issue has also been raised within the Commission and will doubtless be settled by choosing one or the other of those expressions.
Lastly, regarding the State of destination,his delegation was of the view that the State from which an expelled alien had come was under no obligation to readmit that alien at the request of the expelling State, provided that the alien had entered the expelling State lawfully.
Paragraph 2 should also elaborate on what would happen in the event that no State consented to admit an expelled alien; moreover, the words"in that order" should perhaps be added at the end of the paragraph, unless the choice of the State of destination was likewise at the discretion of the expelling State.
It is necessary to allow such exceptions to readmission in order topreserve a fair balance between the rights of the unlawfully expelled alien and the power of the expelling State to control the entry of any alien to its territory in accordance with its legislation in force when a decision is to be taken on the readmission of the alien in question.