Examples of using Its judgment in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In its judgment of 5 December 2011, the Court.
On 19 December 2005, the Court rendered its Judgment.
Elsewhere in its Judgment, the IMT said.
Four weeks later, the Court of Appeals handed down its judgment.
In its Judgment, the Court rejected Belgium's argument.
People also translate
The Tribunal delivered its Judgment on 23 December 2002.
In its judgment in the Norwegian Loans case, it stated that.
The Tribunal delivered its judgment on 18 December 2004.
In its judgment, the Court will answer the question submitted by the parties.
The Supreme Court rendered its judgment in April 2012.
At the time of the preparation of this Report, the Court was deliberating its Judgment.
On 18 November 2008, the Court rendered its judgment on the preliminary objections.
In either case,the Court investigates the allegations and gives its judgment.
Recently, the Court delivered its judgment concerning the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case.
On 7 February 2000, the Tribunal delivered its judgment in the case.
In its judgment in the case of Raj Dayal v. Gilbert Ahnee[2002] SCJ 303, the Supreme Court observed that.
The Supreme Court's position is well reflected in the following passages of its judgment.
On 23 May 2008, the Court rendered its judgment, of which the operative paragraph reads as follows.
IX. What is the validity of the decision given by the ILOAT in its Judgment No. 2867?
In its Judgment the Chamber drew the boundary line for each of six disputed sectors of the land boundary.
The Court found that application inadmissible in its judgment of 18 December 2003.
In its judgment of 16 June 1998, the Court affirmed the validity of Council regulation 3300/91.
At the time of the preparation of this Report, the Court was deliberating its Judgment.
On 3 February 1994, the Court delivered its Judgment in the case concerning the Territorial Dispute Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Chad.
The[appellate body] shall notify the Executive Board and the appellant of its judgment.
In principle, the International Court of Justice has left its judgment in the Arrest Warrant case open to similar interpretation.
In its judgment of 25 September 1997, the Court found that both Hungary and Slovakia had breached their legal obligations.
In considering the merits of the matter and formulating its judgment, the[appellate body] shall.
On 30 November, the Court delivered its judgment in the case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo.
In its judgment of 25 September 1997, the Court found that both Hungary and Slovakia had breached their legal obligations.