Examples of using Observer for denmark in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The observer for Denmark introduced the text agreed upon to revise paragraphs 3, 8 and 27 of the draft resolution.
Paragraph 7 left matters in a vacuum, anddid not meet the concerns expressed by the observer for Denmark and the representative of Italy.
The observer for Denmark stated that she found the report a well-balanced reflection of the views and ideas expressed during the Meeting.
Ms. REMSU(Observer for Canada) said she supported the views expressed by the representatives of the United States,Australia and Germany and the observer for Denmark.
The observer for Denmark stated that his Government did not agree with the inclusion of the words"possible establishment" in the title of agenda item 9.
The panellists responded to the comments made and questions raised by the representatives of Brazil, the Russian Federation, Indonesia, Germany, Cuba, France and China,as well as the observer for Denmark.
The observer for Denmark, addressing the factual content of the report, referred in particular to chapter II B- entitled“Other constructive arrangements”.
Before the vote on the amendment, statements were made by the representatives of Japan, China, South Africa, India, Cyprus, Mexico,Nigeria and Cuba and the observer for Denmark on behalf of the European Union.
The observer for Denmark requested the working group to include in the text of the draft optional protocol the alternative proposal on article 13 submitted by her delegation and that of Australia during the informal consultations.
Following a statement by the moderator and the presentations by the panellists, a discussion ensued, during which the panellists responded to questions raised andcomments made by the representative of India and the observer for Denmark.
The observer for Denmark stated that her delegation would continue to show flexibility in the negotiations with a view to creating an effective mechanism of preventive visits providing the Subcommittee with a reasonable framework for its work.
Before the adoption of the resolution, statements were made by the representative of the United States of America(in explanation of vote) and the observer for Denmark on behalf of the States members of the European Union and the associated countries that are members of the Council.
The observer for Denmark and the Greenland Home Rule Government said that she was pleased to see that article 3 had not been qualified to weaken it and that it specifically referred to the fact that indigenous peoples had the right to self-determination.
Before the resolution was adopted, statements in explanation of vote were made by the representatives of the United States of America andthe Russian Federation and the observer for Denmark on behalf of the States members of the European Union and the associated countries that are members of the Council.
The observer for Denmark, who also spoke on behalf of Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and the Greenland Home Rule Government, said that progress had been achieved in the discussion on many of the issues relating to the establishment of a permanent forum.
Before the decision was adopted, statements were made by the representatives of the United States of America and Cuba and the observer for Denmark(on behalf of the European Union) as well as by the Director of the New York Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, who responded to questions raised; after the decision was adopted, the representative of Japan made a statement.
The observer for Denmark, on behalf of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Greenland Home Rule Government, and the Saami Parliaments of Finland, Norway and Sweden, strongly supported the establishment of the permanent forum.
Mr. Madrid Parra(Spain), supported by Mr. Bellenger(France),Mr. Houmann(Observer for Denmark), Mr. Sandoval(Chile), Mr. Velázquez(Paraguay) and Mr. Yang Lixin(China), said that the proposed amendment dealt satisfactorily with a situation that was not otherwise covered by the draft convention.
The observer for Denmark welcomed the establishment of the Advisory Group for the Voluntary Fund and explained that Denmark participated in that group as an active observer and did not wish to be involved in the adoption of recommendations concerning specific projects.
Mr. ALLEN(United Kingdom),supported by Mr. ANDERSEN(Observer for Denmark) and Mr. BURMAN(United States of America) proposed that paragraph 7 should be amended to read:"Except in so far as it relates to the transmission or receipt of a data message, this article is not intended to deal with the legal consequences that may flow from either that data message or the acknowledgement of its receipt.
The observer for Denmark stated that in order for the Voluntary Fund for the International Decade to work efficiently throughout the Decade in a way that indigenous peoples could identify with, it would be necessary for clear guidelines to be established for its operation.
The observer for Denmark, on behalf of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, the Saami Parliaments of Finland, Norway and Sweden, and the Greenland Home Rule Government, noted with satisfaction that the working group would meet again prior to the fifty-sixth session of the Commission.
The observer for Denmark expressed the view that it was essential that Governments, non-governmental organizations and intergovernmental organizations reaffirmed their commitment to the principles of sustainable use of natural resources, allowing indigenous peoples dependent on hunting, fishing and gathering to continue to develop their traditional subsistence activities regardless of whether they were conducted on land or sea.
The Observer for Denmark introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/1999/L.74, sponsored by Argentina, Belgium, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Nepal, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Portugal, the Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
At the same meeting, the observer for Denmark introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/2003/L.43, sponsored by Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America.
The observers for Denmark and Panama made statements.
Before the decision was adopted, statements were made by the representatives of the United States of America, Cuba andSouth Africa and the observers for Denmark(on behalf of the European Union) and Israel; after the decision was adopted, the representative of Australia made a statement.
An interactive discussion ensued, during which statements were made by the representatives of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, France and the Sudan,as well as the observers for Denmark, Egypt, the Netherlands and Cape Verde.
Before the vote on the draft decision, statements were made by the representatives of Cuba, the Islamic Republic of Iran, China, Pakistan, the Sudan, South Africa,Benin and Egypt, and the observers for Denmark(on behalf of the European Union) and Saudi Arabia.
Also at the 2nd meeting, statements were made by the representatives of China, Colombia, Cuba, Germany, Japan, Mongolia, Morocco, Cameroon and the United States,as well as the observers for Denmark, New Zealand, the Philippines, Iran(Islamic Republic of), Sierra Leone, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, the Republic of Korea, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Tonga, Cape Verde, Afghanistan and Brazil.
