Examples of using One interlocutor in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
One interlocutor recommended that such translations should be made under ICTY's control.
Our free online chat allows its visitors to quickly and efficiently find a partner in dialogue,and to move from one interlocutor to another.
As one interlocutor told the Mission:"The tool is too fragile, and would easily break.
The process of selecting Secretary-General's Special Representatives and Envoys could be haphazard and their quality varied,noted one interlocutor; yet, they could make all the difference on the ground.
One interlocutor expressed a wish to be able to set up a legal aid clinic for victims of domestic violence.
Lack of legal clarity in this important field apparently creates a sense of insecurity andof being held"in limbo", as one interlocutor from a religious minority community expressed it.
One interlocutor described it as a"cancer" that would spread and kill Afghan society over the long term.
While emphasizing the value of the Council's growing awareness of the need for preventive action, one interlocutor pointed out that it needed to improve conflict resolution in, for example, Cyprus and the Middle East.
This did not mean, one interlocutor pointed out, that Council members should address only issues in which they have a strong national interest.
This Organization is more necessary today than ever before, at a time when the world is shrinking andwhen we increasingly need more than one interlocutor to which we can turn when faced with issues that could provoke violence and war.
One interlocutor in this mechanism of customs fraud and direct supply of FAPC/UCPD is the Arua-based Ugandan businessman James Nyakuni.
Eritrea's rejection of Ethiopia's Peace Plan is thus puzzling not only because the plan addresses all the concerns that Eritrea had expressed with regards to Ethiopia's previous position, butalso because Eritrea had indicated to more than one interlocutor that it would be ready for dialogue if Ethiopia were to do what it did through the Peace Plan.
One interlocutor warned against establishing Information Centres to reflect current political and administrative divisions within the State.
Noting that expert groups usually had a better feel for events on the ground than officials anddiplomats at Headquarters, one interlocutor urged that their reports always be sent to the Council as a whole and called for efforts to ensure that decisions on their reappointment were made on the basis of merit, not politics.
One interlocutor stated that parts of the shrapnel were still inside the child's body but could not be removed owing to a lack of access to medical facilities.
Commenting on the format of meetings and participation, one interlocutor observed that those two issues were clearly laid out in the provisional rules of procedure and that all meetings were open unless otherwise decided.
One interlocutor frankly pointed out that there could be 100,000 candidates throughout the country if the estimated 90 political parties fielded 10 candidates each.
One interlocutor suggested that the ideal would be to have many satellites arising from a main Centre, so that people would not have to travel to Sarajevo or Banja Luka to obtain information.
One interlocutor urged incoming members to employ that space proactively from day one, calling that the most important lesson from her/his experience in the Council.
One interlocutor was of the view that the concept of the National Congress was no longer needed in the country now that the National Assembly and Senate were bodies composed of people's representatives.
One interlocutor, however, questioned whether unanimity should always be the goal, since the Council was not an omnipotent body that was expected to address all security-related issues.
According to one interlocutor, the efforts of the Council had been relatively successful in Mali, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Yemen and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
One interlocutor from civil society, was of the view that none of the NGOs in BiH could ever economically ensure the sustainability of the Information Centre.
Although one interlocutor commented that it was still too early to assess the results in Libya, including how many lives had been lost or saved, most speakers had strong views on the matter.
One interlocutor commented that it was unclear whether the subsidiary bodies were working well on the whole, but there was no doubt that preserving the independence of experts was essential to their proper functioning.
One interlocutor said that the intention was to destroy the will of this age group through persecution, humiliation and oppression in order to prevent them from joining resistance activities against the occupation.
Finally, one interlocutor noted that the workload that members put on themselves also contributed to the lack of interactivity since written statements were safer and easier to prepare.
One interlocutor stated that a detained family member had requested only one visit every six months, because he was beaten after visits and his health had greatly deteriorated after each visit.
According to one interlocutor, the Council was often in need of consensus-builders, a function that could sometimes be performed by elected members, especially if there were fissures among the five permanent members.
One interlocutor suggested that authorities and political parties should be kept at some distance from the project, considering that the public would not trust the neutrality of Information Centres if there were such involvement.