Examples of using Registry guide in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He asked whether it had been used elsewhere in the draft Registry Guide.
The Working Group referred the draft Registry Guide to the Commission for adoption at its upcoming forty-sixth session.
Subject to above-mentioned changes, the Commission adopted the introduction to the draft Registry Guide.
Consequently, the Registry Guide can be adapted readily to the diverse legal traditions and drafting styles of different States.
Lastly, document A/CN.9/XLVI/CRP.4 contained a draft decision concerning the adoption of the Registry Guide.
For a thorough understanding, however, the Registry Guide should be read together with the Secured Transactions Guide. .
The Commission then turned to the examples of registry forms set forth in annex II of the draft Registry Guide.
The Registry Guide is aimed at implementing the Secured Transactions Guide by addressing these issues in greater detail.
During the earlier part of the meeting the Commission had discussed the terms"grantor" and"secured creditor" in the draft Registry Guide.
It also had agreed that the draft registry guide should be finalized and submitted to the Commission for adoption at its following session.
The Working Group documents before the Commission(A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.54 and Add.1-4)therefore contained the commentary to the draft Registry Guide.
Mr. Boettcher(Germany) emphasized the importance of ensuring that the draft Registry Guide was as simple and readable as possible for users.
In addition, the Registry Guide has benefited from international sources that deal with secured transactions, including the following.
At the close of its twenty-third session, the Working Group adopted the draft Registry Guide(A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.54 and Add.1-6) A/CN.9/767, para. 15.
The Registry Guide uses neutral generic legal terminology that is consistent with the terminology used in the Secured Transactions Guide. .
However, the prevailing view was that the draft Registry Guide should be presented as a separate, stand-alone, comprehensive guide. .
The Chairperson invited comments on document A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.54, which contained the draft preface andintroduction to the draft Registry Guide.
The Chairperson invited comments on annex II to the draft Registry Guide, which contained examples of registry forms A/CN.9/781/Add.2.
It was stated that in that way comprehensive guidance would be offered to States consistent with the Secured Transactions Guide and the Registry Guide.
Where appropriate, the Registry Guide explains the policy rationale for a particular approach recommended in the Secured Transactions Guide. .
Particularly in relation to the technical aspects of registry design and operation, the Registry Guide draws on these national precedents.
In addition, the Working Group agreed that the draft Registry Guide should be finalized and submitted to the Commission for adoption at its forty-sixth session in 2013 A/CN.9/743, para. 73.
With respect to paragraph 6, it was suggested that the issues addressed therein should rather be discussed only in the guide to enactment by reference to the Registry Guide.
The security rights registry envisaged by the Secured Transactions Guide and the Registry Guide is governed by the following overarching principles.
In addition, it was agreed that,where the text offered options, examples of model regulations could be included in an annex to the draft Registry Guide.
Moreover, such a registry guide could include model regulations or administrative rules with accompanying commentary explaining policy choices and consequences.
The cases addressed in the note could not arise under French law orunder the law of a large proportion of the States that would be using the draft Registry Guide.
It was agreed that that title was appropriate,mainly as it indicated the contents of the draft Registry Guide but also its relationship to the Secured Transactions Guide. .
In addition, the Registry Guide is intended to promote the harmonization of national security rights registration regimes and easier coordination among national security rights registries. .
The Commission further noted that the Working Group, at its twenty-first session,had approved the substance of the recommendations of the draft Registry Guide, as well as examples of registration forms.
