Examples of using Ring comparison in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Ring comparison.
The region is a full participant in the ICP ring comparison.
The ring comparison.
A survey comprising countries participating in the Ring comparison.
Global Ring Comparison programme.
The annex to the present report shows the countries included in the ring comparison.
The ring comparison was used to combine the results for the other five regions.
The Ring survey covering countries taking part in the Ring comparison.
The ICP Global Office is coordinating the Ring Comparison with the help of regional offices.
A number of countries express doubts about the quality of price data collected for the Ring comparison.
The participating countries stress that the Ring comparison ran into a number of problems.
It is acknowledged that it is not essential that the Global Office run the Ring comparison.
The inclusion of the Eurostat/OECD region in the ring comparison and global results brings the total to 147 countries see appendix.
The Global Office has also prepared a core international list of equipment goods for the ring comparison.
New methodology, called the ring comparison, has been implemented to overcome the perceived weakness of the previous approach.
Other chapters document the methodology for estimation andaggregation of PPPs for the regional and ring comparisons.
Data from the regional and ring comparison programmes required by the Global Office are defined.
Eurostat and OECD provided significant in kind support with technical assistance andsupport for the data collection carried out by their member countries participating in the ring comparison.
As part of the Ring Comparison some Eurostat/OECD group countries have participated in the ICP surveys covering all GDP components.
The results of the two programmes will be brought together by the"ring" comparison, which will include countries from the Eurostat/OECD region.
Evaluation of the ring comparison programme and product specifications to integrate that collection with the regional collections.
The results of the two programmes will be brought together as some of their member countries will participate in the global Ring Comparison, which will provide the linkage between the regions.
Owing to delays in the regular ICP surveys, the Ring comparison started too late in the process and lost the flexibility needed to make adjustments underway.
The first stage entailed using the Russian Federation as a bridge country;the second stage involved creating a link to the other four regions using the relationships established by the OECD/Eurostat countries that had participated in the ring comparison.
During the final phases of ring comparison and global data calculations, further tools with advance features were being developed to accompany the ToolPack.
Global specifications were prepared for these items and priced by all countries, except those in the CIS, OECD and Eurostat regions, for their regional comparisons, with the same data used for the global results. Ring countries in the OECD/Eurostat region priced the ICP global specifications for the ring comparison.
Eurostat/OECD fully participated in the ring comparison, with four member countries collecting prices that have been used to bring their results into relation with those of the other ICP regions.
The multilateral Ring Comparison endorsed by the ICP Executive Board and Technical Advisory Group requires a selected number of countries or areas from each region to participate in a separate comparison organized specifically to provide a link between regions.
Eurostat/OECD is fully participating in the ring comparison with four member countries collecting prices that will be used to bring their results together with the ICP regions.
The introduction of the ring comparison concept required the development of new methodology to use the PPPs from the ring comparison to calibrate the regional data to a global currency.
