Examples of using String similarity in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
But NOT for String Similarity or DNS Stability.
Contention sets resulting from String Similarity review.
String similarity and string contention resolution.
This occurs during the String Similarity review in Initial Evaluation.
Thise similarity review will be conducted by a panel of String Similarity Examiners.
This occurs during the String Similarity review in Initial Evaluation.
String similarity review should include aural(sound) and commercial impression(meaning) as well as visual similarity. .
ICANN communicates the results of the String Similarity review, including contention sets.
String Similarity analysis will begin immediately thereafter and string contention sets will be posted once this analysis is complete.
This occurs during the String Similarity review in Initial Evaluation.
Any subsequent applications to ICANN for strings on these lists are subject to denial based on the string similarity review see Module 2.
Results from String Similarity review, including string contention sets.
I agree that a higher visual similarity score could be indicative of greater difficulty in passing the string similarity review.
Limited clarifications may be sought for String Similarity, DNS Stability and Background Screening as needed.
Applicant Guidebook- Proposed Final Version 2-8 higher visual similarity score suggests a higher probability that the application will not pass the String Similarity review.
Where an application does not pass the string similarity review, the applicant will be notified as soon as the review is completed.
In general, applicants should expect that a higher visual similarity score suggests a higher probability that the application will not pass the String Similarity review.
The panel of String Similarity Examiners will create contention sets that may be used in later stages of evaluation.
Applicant Guidebook- April(30 May 2011) Discussion Draft 1-9 If batching is required, the String Similarity review will be completed on all applications prior to the establishment of evaluation priority batches.
The outcome of the String Similarity review described in Module 2 is the identification of contention sets among applications that have direct or indirect contention relationships with one another.
As has been stated in relation to previous public comment periods, the string similarity assessment in the initial evaluation is solely focused on visual similarity. .
The output from the String Similarity Panel is presented in such a format, covering all pairs of proposed strings, to facilitate the establishment of contention sets.
In performing the string confusion review, the panel of String Similarity Examiners will create contention sets that may be used later in the process.
The String Similarity review and the String Confusion objection provisions already protect delegated TLDs against applications featuring confusingly similar strings. .
Variant TLD strings that are listed as part of the application will also be subject to the string similarity analysis.3 The panel will examine all the algorithm data and perform its own review of similarities between strings and whether they rise to the level of string confusion.
The String Similarity PanelExaminers will also review the entire pool of applied-for strings to determine whether the strings proposed in any two or more applications are so similar that they would create a probability of user confusion if allowed to coexist in the DNS.
In performing this review, the String Similarity Panel will create contention sets that may be used in later stages of evaluation.
If batching is required, the String Similarity review will be completed on all applications prior to the establishment of evaluation priority batches.
For DNS Stability and String Similarity, as the submitted string cannot be modified, the need for clarifications is expected to be minimal.
The requirements to increase the scope of string similarity assessment beyond visual similarity have already been addressed in earlier comment rounds and no new aspects have been put forward to consider.