Examples of using Undefined character in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This reservation, owing to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is inadmissible under international law.
The Government of Denmark finds that the general reservation with reference to the provisions of Islamic law is of unlimited scope and undefined character.
Norway maintains that the Iranian reservation,due to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is inadmissible under international law.
The Government of Denmark finds that the general reservation with reference to the provisions of Islamic law are of unlimited scope and undefined character.
It is the position of the Government of Norway that,due to its unlimited scope and undefined character, this part of the reservation is contrary to object and purpose of the Convention.
The Government of Denmark finds that the reservations to articles 2 and16 with reference to the provisions of Islamic Shariah is of unlimited scope and undefined character.
Because of its unlimited scope and undefined character the reservation is incompatible with the object and purposes of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law.
The Government of Norway considers that the reservation made bythe Government of Pakistan, owing to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention.
Because of its general and undefined character, the Government of Denmark considers this reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law.
The Government of Norway considers that the reservation made bythe Government of Pakistan, owing to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention.
Because of their unlimited scope and undefined character these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law.
The Government ofNorway considers that the reservation made by the State of Qatar, due to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is inadmissible under international law.
Because of their unlimited scope and undefined character these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law.
The Government of Norway considers that the latter part of the reservation made bythe Kingdom of Lesotho, owing to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is inadmissible under international law.
Because of its unlimited scope and undefined character, the Government of Denmark considers this reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and accordingly inadmissible and without effect under international law.
The Government of Denmark finds that the general reservation with reference to the Constitution of Brunei Darussalam and to the beliefs andprinciples of Islamic law is of unlimited scope and undefined character.
In the view ofthe Government of Finland, the unlimited and undefined character of the said reservations create serious doubts about the commitment of the reserving State to fulfil its obligations under the Convention.
The Government of Denmark finds that the general reservation with reference to Islamic shariah andthe Constitution of Malaysia is in reality of unlimited scope and undefined character and that the specific reservations cover multiple, central provisions of the Convention.
In view of the Government of Finland,the unlimited and undefined character of the first part of the said reservation creates serious doubts about the commitment of the reserving State to fulfil its obligations under the Convention.
The Government of the Hellenic Republic considers that the reservation to all provisions of the Convention not in accordance with the provisions of the Islamic sharia andlegislation in force in the Sultanate of Oman is of unlimited scope and undefined character, which, furthermore, subjects the application of the Convention to the domestic law of the Sultanate of Oman.
In the view of the Government of Finland,the unlimited and undefined character of the said reservation leaves open to what extent the State of Qatar commits itself to the Convention and to the fulfilment of its obligations under the Convention.
The Government of the Hellenic Republic considers that the reservation regarding those provisions of the said Convention that may be contrary to the Constitution of Brunei Darussalam and to the beliefs and principles of Islam,the official religion of Brunei Darussalam is of unlimited scope and undefined character, which, furthermore, subjects the application of the Convention to the constitutional law of Brunei Darussalam and the beliefs and principles of Islam.
In the view of the Government of Finland,the unlimited and undefined character of the said reservation leaves open to what extent the reserving State commits itself to the Convention and therefore creates serious doubts about the commitment of the reserving State to fulfil its obligations under the Convention.
The Government of Norway considers that reservation(3) made by the Republic of Singapore,due to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention, and thus impermissible under article 51, paragraph 2, of the Convention.
Furthermore, in the view of the Government of Finland,the unlimited and undefined character of the reservation to article 16(f) leaves open to what extent the reserving State commits itself to the Convention and therefore creates serious doubts about the commitment of the reserving State to fulfil its obligations under the Convention.
The Government of Norway considers that the reservationmade by the Government of Saudi Arabia, due to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention, and thus impermissible under article 51, paragraph 2, of the Convention.
The Government of Canada notes that such general reservation of unlimited scope and undefined character does not clearly define for the other States parties to the Convention the extent to which Brunei Darussalam has accepted the obligations of the Convention and creates serious doubts as to the commitment of the State to fulfil its obligations under the Convention.
The Government of Norway considers that the reservation(2) made by the Government of Oman,due to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention, and thus impermissible under article 51, paragraph 2, of the Convention.
The Government of Norway considers that the reservation made by the Government of Saudi Arabia,due to its unlimited scope and undefined character, is contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention, and thus impermissible under article 20, paragraph 2, of the Convention.
The Government of Norway considers that the reservation made by the Government of Malaysia,due to its very broad scope and undefined character, is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention, and thus not permitted under article 51, paragraph 2, of the Convention.