Examples of using Bayesian in English and their translations into Serbian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Bayesian probability belongs to the category of evidential probabilities;
So the personalist requires the dynamic assumption to be Bayesian.
Applications of finite state machines and Bayesian networks in information theory.
The Bayesian analysis generalizes easily to the case in which we relax the 50:50 population assumption.
Mathematician Pierre-Simon Laplace pioneered andpopularised what is now called Bayesian probability.
The Bayesian interpretation provides a standard set of procedures and formulae to perform this calculation.
Cox's theorem has come to be used as one of the justifications for the use of Bayesian probability theory.
Despite growth of Bayesian research, most undergraduate teaching is still based on frequentist statistics.
It is true that in consistency a personalist could abandon the Bayesian model of learning from experience.
Use the Bayesian approach to systematically test your hypotheses to increase your confidence in your conclusions.
It is of special interest in decision theory, and for the Bayesian interpretation of probability theory.
Use the Bayesian approach to systematically test your hypotheses to increase your confidence in your conclusions.
These languages provide a syntax for describing a Bayesian model and generate a method for solving it using simulation.
The winners submitted an algorithm that utilized feature generation(a form of representation learning),random forests, and Bayesian networks.
Broadly speaking, there are two views on Bayesian probability that interpret the probability concept in different ways.
In the 20th century, the ideas of Laplace developed in two directions, giving rise to objective andsubjective currents in Bayesian practice.
If a bookmaker follows the rules of the Bayesian calculus in the construction of his odds, a Dutch book cannot be made.
In the Bayesian view, a probability is assigned to a hypothesis, whereas under frequentist inference, a hypothesis is typically tested without being assigned a probability.
Broadly speaking, there are two views on Bayesian probability that interpret the'probability' concept in different ways.
The Bayesian interpretation of probability can be seen as an extension of propositional logic that enables reasoning with hypotheses,[4] that is to say, with propositions whose truth or falsity is unknown.
The most popular version of subjective probability is Bayesian probability, which includes expert knowledge as well as experimental data to produce probabilities.
Wald's paper renewed and synthesized many concepts of statistical theory, including loss functions, risk functions, admissible decision rules,antecedent distributions, Bayesian procedures, and minimax procedures.
The objective and subjective variants of Bayesian probability differ mainly in their interpretation and construction of the prior probability.
The complexity of genome evolution poses many exciting challenges to developers of mathematical models and algorithms, who have recourse to a spectra of algorithmic, statistical and mathematical techniques, ranging from exact, heuristics, fixed parameter andapproximation algorithms for problems based on parsimony models to Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms for Bayesian analysis of problems based on probabilistic models.
According to the objectivist view,the rules of Bayesian statistics can be justified by requirements of rationality and consistency and interpreted as an extension of logic.
The complexity of genome evolution poses many exciting challenges to developers of mathematical models and algorithms, who have recourse to a spectrum of algorithmic, statistical and mathematical techniques, ranging from exact, heuristics, fixed parameter andapproximation algorithms for problems based on parsimony models to Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for Bayesian analysis of problems based on probabilistic models.
The first two resolutions discussed above(the"simple resolution" and the"Bayesian resolution") correspond to two possible interpretations of what is going on in step 6 of the argument.
The term"Bayesian" refers to the 18th century mathematician and theologian Thomas Bayes, who provided the first mathematical treatment of a non-trivial problem of Bayesian inference.
However, Ian Hacking noted that traditional Dutch book arguments did not specify Bayesian updating: they left open the possibility that non-Bayesian updating rules could avoid Dutch books.
Thus, the Bayesian statistican needs either to use informed priors(using relevant expertise or previous data) or to choose among the competing methods for constructing"objective" priors.