Examples of using Destructive order in English and their translations into Serbian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Latin
-
Cyrillic
Consumer society” is a qualitative leap in the development of capitalism as a destructive order.
With capitalism becoming a totalitarian destructive order, the October Revolution acquires a new dimension.
In other words, if socialism is a„necessity”,then capitalism cannot be a destructive order.
By overlooking that capitalism is essentially a destructive order, Marx overlooked the specificity of capitalist dialectics.
The nature of the capitalist class is conditioned by the nature of capitalism as a totalitarian destructive order.
In other words, the nature of capitalism as a totalitarian destructive order conditions the nature of the struggle against capitalism.
When creating a vision of the future, we should bear in mind the consequences of capitalism as a destructive order.
Today, being a conformist means adapting to capitalism as a destructive order and thus becoming a destructive being.
The purpose of“action” is to vent discontent in the way andby the means imposed by capitalism as a destructive order.
Capitalism has become a one-dimensional destructive order and, as such, produces“one-dimensional”(Marcuse) destructive man.
In any case,they can acquire a proper place only in the context of a critique of capitalism as a totalitarian destructive order.
With capitalism becoming a totalitarian destructive order, man's creative potential has turned into a destructive power in the form of science and technology.
The purpose of the„action” is to release the pent up dissatisfaction in a way andthrough means imposed by capitalism as a destructive order.
Not a word on capitalism as a destructive order, nor, in that context, about consciousness of the possible destruction of life as an essential content of revolutionary consciousness.
Not even the most radical Marxist critics of capitalism have pointed to the truth that capitalism is essentially a destructive order.
At the same time, since he does not regard capitalism as a totalitarian destructive order, Marx does not question the legitimacy of the capitalist development of the productive forces.
(28) This thesis makes concrete historical sense only if we don't ignore the fact that capitalism has become a totalitarian destructive order.
His critique of capitalism lacks dramatic overtones indicating the true nature of capitalism as a destructive order- which calls for a radical confrontation with capitalism.
Man proves that in spite of everything, he still exists as an autonomous human being andthus derogates capitalism as a totalitarian destructive order.
By becoming a totalitarian destructive order, capitalism called into question the modern way of thinking based on existential apriorism and the corresponding idea of progress.
Marx does not envision the possibility of stepping out of and beyond capitalism into a civilization of freedom, as it relates to the development of capitalism as a destructive order.
By becoming a totalitarian destructive order, capitalism absorbs into its existential orbit, and thus degenerates and destroys, everything that enables man to be a human being.
Asteroids, comets, supernovas, black holes,anti-matter- all these phenomena become the projections of a fear of destruction created by capitalism as a destructive order.
The humanist intelligentsia needs to point out the increasingly dramatic consequences of the development of capitalism as a destructive order, as well as the existing objective possibilities for the creation of a new world.
Marx speaks about capitalism's destructive treatment of the soil, buthe does not come to the conclusion that capitalism is essentially a destructive order.
Instead of an idea of the future reached in relation to capitalism as a totalitarian destructive order, their basis for a critique of capitalism is an idealized picture of the“socialist past”.
Technical potential of the capitalist development of the productive forces is seen in relation to the consequences created by capitalism as a destructive order.
Considering that the development of capitalism as a totalitarian destructive order remained outside the reach of their critique, it can be said that Praxis philosophy remained historically marginalized.
His critical views, like Marx' critical observations about the capitalist exhaustion of the soil,acquire a true value only in the context of a comprehensive critique of capitalism as a destructive order.
By becoming a totalitarian destructive order and by depriving man of the possibility of realizing his creative potentials in everyday life and in a humane way, capitalism produced the most atrocious crimes.