Examples of using Applicant cannot in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The applicant cannot owe the city any money.
In cassation cases,legal aid will be refused if the applicant cannot show good grounds for cassation.
The applicant cannot be over 70 years of age at the end of the loan period.
A postal application may be made andis usually appropriate if the Applicant cannot easily call in person to a Law Centre.
If an applicant cannot agree with the outcome of a Member State's assessment, it may request re-examination by the Agency.
(a) the indications for which the medicinal product in question isintended are encountered so rarely that the applicant cannot reasonably be expected to provide comprehensive evidence;
The applicant cannot require the Court to substitute its own assessment for that of the Court of First Instance in that regard.
(d) explain why due to these substantial differences, the applicant cannot perform his profession in a satisfactory manner in the host Member State territory;
If the applicant cannot submit these certificates owing to a lack of means, the court itself may request these from the competent bodies.
For example, at least 3 months must be employed, after a certain age of the applicant it is necessary to involve a co-debtor andwith high probability the applicant cannot be in the debtors register.
The Applicant cannot submit as a rigorous thesis his/her diploma thesis or any other qualification thesis, neither the work of a compilation character.
Since the European Central Bank Staff Rules do not lay down a specific prior request procedure in circumstances where the Bank has not previously taken a decision open to review, an applicant cannot be criticised for having requested an administrative review without the Bank having first adopted a decision open to review.
Consequently, the applicant cannot be regarded, in this case, as representing the interests of individual mandarin growers before the Board of Appeal.
In view of the fact, stated in paragraph 23 above, that the request for an extension did not contain a sufficient statement of reasons for the purposes of the second sentence of Rule 71(1)of Regulation No 2868/95, the applicant cannot criticise OHIM for not explaining in what respect the circumstances of the case- which the applicant had not specified- did not justify an extension.
The applicant cannot be an undertaking in difficulty as it is defined in the Communication from the Commission- Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty(2014/C 249/01).
Where the operator of the service facility and the applicant cannot agree on a viable alternative, the operator of the service facility may refuse the request indicating the alternatives which it considers to be viable.
An applicant cannot properly put forward as a ground of annulment the fact that irrelevant documents were not communicated to it(see Aalborg Portland and Others v Commission, paragraph 145 above, paragraph 126 and the caselaw cited).
It follows that the applicant cannot find support in the order in Lassalle v Parliament, because in that case the body in question, the Staff Committee of the European Parliament, was exclusively governed by Community law.
In that regard, the applicant cannot seriously dispute the confidential nature of that information or maintain that it was‘semi-public', since it was capable of conferring a distinct advantage on a trader wishing to enter into contracts with those companies before the anti-dumping procedures had been concluded.
In those circumstances, the applicant cannot complain that the Commission did not study, on its own initiative, evidence which could have justified, in that regard, the adoption of an approach different from that expressed in the Communication of 10 October 2001 and the decision to open the formal investigation procedure.
Applicants cannot be living in Mexico at the time of application.
The applicants cannot find any support in the fact that proceedings were not brought against other undertakings.
At issue therefore are documents the disclosure of which the applicants could not claim pursuant to the basic regulation.
The applicants cannot properly rely on the caselaw to the effect that it follows from the general scheme of the Treaty that the procedure under Article 88 EC must never produce a result which is contrary to the specific provisions of the Treaty.
Although the applicant could not influence the charges for wholesale services, it did in any event have scope to increase its retail prices for ADSL access services(see paragraphs 141 to 151 above).
The fact that there is no guarantee that the programmewill continue from one year to another means that potential applicants cannot plan ahead(in particular those who cannot consider spending one year abroad without a grant).
Consequently, the applicants cannot claim to have had general access to new information, the discovery of which would enable them to put forward new pleas or complaints to be regarded as admissible under Article 84 of the Rules of Procedure.
The application to rebut the presumption of servicemay be submitted on the basis of the fact that the applicant could not receive the official document through no fault of his own, because.
