Examples of using Entity would in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Yes, and the entity would still be in him.
The possibility of the contract with the customer being terminatedis not a relevant consideration in assessing whether the entity would be able to readily direct the asset for another use.
Such an EU entity would therefore need to have adequate local risk management, employees and operational independence.
A practical limitation on an entity'sability to direct an asset for another use exists if an entity would incur significant economic losses to direct the asset for another use.
For example, an entity would recognise a receivable if it has a present right to payment even though that amount may be subject to refund in the future.
For example, if the customer acceptance clause is based on meeting specified size andweight characteristics, an entity would be able to determine whether those criteria have been met before receiving the customers acceptance.
As no other entity would be willing to finance the totality of the Sentinel exploitation costs, no data collected through the Sentinels would be available for the GMES service component.
For example, if a software licence period begins before an entity provides(or otherwise makes available) to the customer a code thatenables the customer to immediately use the software, the entity would not recognise revenue before that code has been provided(or otherwise made available).
Tax planning opportunities are actions that the entity would take in order to create or increase taxable income in a particular period before the expiry of a tax loss or tax credit carryforward.
An entity would not recognize revenue on the basis of costs incurred that are attributable to significant inefficiencies in performance that is not reflected in the price of the contract(e.g. unexpected amounts of wasted materials, labor, etc.) that were incurred to satisfy a performance obligation.”.
In those circumstances,a performance obligation is satisfied over time if an entity determines that another entity would not need to substantially re-perform the work that the entity has completed to date if that other entity were to fulfil the remaining performance obligation to the customer.
For example, an entity would not recognize revenue on the basis of costs incurred that are attributable to significant inefficiencies in the entity's performance that were not reflected in the price of the contract(for example, the costs of unexpected amounts of wasted materials, labor, or other resources that were incurred to satisfy the performance obligation).
For example,if a customer's ability to pay the consideration deteriorates significantly, an entity would reassess whether it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which the entity will be entitled in exchange for the remaining goods or services that will be transferred to the customer.
Typically, an investment entity would have several investors who pool their funds to gain access to investment management services and investment opportunities that they might not have had access to individually.
B9 In accordance with paragraph 37,an entity has a right to payment for performance completed to date if the entity would be entitled to an amount that at least compensates the entity for its performance completed to date in the event that the customer or another party terminates the contract for reasons other than the entity's failure to perform as promised.
Residual value is the estimated amount that an entity would currently obtain from disposal of the asset, after deducting the estimated costs of disposal, if the asset were already of the age and in the condition expected at the end of its useful life.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, an arrangement ora series thereof shall be regarded as non-genuine to the extent that the entity would not own the assets or would not have undertaken the risks which generate all, or part of, its income if it were not controlled by a company where the significant people's functions, which are relevant to those assets and risks, are carried out and are instrumental in generating the controlled company's income.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, an arrangement ora series thereof shall be regarded as non-genuine to the extent that the entity would not own the assets or would not have undertaken the risks which generate all, or part of, its income if it were not controlled by a company where the significant people's functions, which are relevant to those assets and risks, are carried out and are instrumental in generating the controlled company's income.
Any imposition of a new EU insolvency regime on existing entities would raise transitional problems, including the impact on creditors and counterparties.
UK entities would also cease to be eligible to receive EU grants and to participate in EU procurement procedures under current terms.
Audited entities would invite a minimum number of firms to participate in a tendering procedure, including a non-Big Four firm.
UK entities would cease to be eligible as EU entities for the purpose of receiving EU grants and participating in EU procurement procedures; and.
Restricting investments in Chinese entities would be meant to protect U.S. investors from excessive risk due to lack of regulatory supervision.
UK entities would cease to be eligible for receiving EU grants and participating in EU procurement procedures.
On EU funding, UK entities would no longer be eligible to receive EU grants or participate in EU procurement procedures.
Liquidation of banks entrusted to, and under the authority of, administrative banking entities would mean the transfer of powers from judicial to administrative authorities: something which might conflict with national laws, or even constitutions.
The measure is counter-productive since splitting into two separate legal entities would comply with the rules but undermine the quality of controls, which would no longer have access to the various interactions between the two entities. .
In particular this couldlead to some confusion as to which national public benefit entities would be entitled to convert to an FE, unless this is clearly specified by the Member States.