Examples of using Many evolutionists in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
However, many evolutionists disagree with this picture.
One can just define‘science' to exclude everything that one doesn't like, as many evolutionists do today.
Even many evolutionists would disagree with you here as well.
Operational science has destroyed this evolutionary notion;so much so that many evolutionists now want to leave the origin of life out of the debate.
Many evolutionists starting with Darwin have used this reasoning.
Air spaces between the feathers serve to insulate the small body,a function so important that many evolutionists assume that feathers originated primarily for insulation, and only later facilitated flight.
But as shown, many evolutionists agree there are only two, so there are double standards at work.
Examples of valid and fallacious reasoning are discussed, with emphasis on showing how logical reasoning can support the truth of biblical creation,and demonstrate the fallacies in many evolutionists' arguments.
Many evolutionists support whale evolution by alleging that there are vestigial hind legs buried in their flesh.
It is fallacious to claim, as many evolutionists do, that believing in miracles means that laboratory science would be impossible.
Many evolutionists claim that dinosaurs developed feathers for insulation and later evolved and refined them for flight purposes.
Yet the materialistic bias of many evolutionists means that they reject an intelligent source for the literally encyclopedic information carried in every living cell.
Many evolutionists rule out intelligent design a priori, so the evidence, overwhelming as it is, would probably have no effect.
Second, even many evolutionists think that Gould has largely himself to blame because of his injudicious(from an evolutionary viewpoint) comments.
Many evolutionists claim mutations and antibiotic resistance in bacteria(operational science) as being some sort of prediction of evolution(origins science).
Many evolutionists point to allegedly imperfect structures as‘proof' of evolution, although this is really an argument against perfect design rather than for evolution.
Many evolutionists chide creationists not because of the facts, but because creationists refuse to play by the current rules of the game that exclude supernatural creation a priori.
This doesn't stop many evolutionists(ignorant of Orgel's distinction) claiming that crystals prove that specified complexity can arise naturally, they merely prove that order can arise naturally, which no creationists contests.
Many evolutionist propagandists believe that they simply need to demonstrate that a creationist has a‘fundamentalist' religious belief to discredit his purely scientific claims.
Many theistic evolutionists openly declare that it is not.
The NAS guidebook, which is compiled by many leading evolutionists, obviously contains the most up-to-date and major arguments for evolution.
I have already said that many individual evolutionists, like the Pope, are also religious, but I think they're deluding themselves.
Since man does not appear until late in the fossil record,theistic evolutionists believe many creatures lived, died, and became extinct long before man came into existence.
Many modern evolutionists no longer claim that the human embryo repeats the adult stages of its alleged evolutionary ancestors, but point to Haeckel's drawings(top row) to claim that it repeats the embryonic stages.