Examples of using Prior processing in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Directly without prior processing; or.
The MMR vaccine contains the following ingredients along with remnants of prior processing.
Consequently, direct co-incineration, without prior processing, of all three categories of materials should be permitted.
Of being exploited or marketed without prior processing.
If the holder cannot economically reuse that product without prior processing, it is a burden which the holder seeks to discard and is therefore essentially waste. 33.
People also translate
In the case of hydrocarbons which are accidentally spilled and cause soil and groundwater contamination, the Court has held that they do notconstitute a product which can be reused without prior processing(see Van der Walle, paragraph 47).
In that regard, the degree of probability that goods,a substance or a product will be reused without a prior processing operation constitutes a criterion relevant to assessing whether or not they constitute waste within the meaning of Directive 2008/98.
I Was slightly confused as to whether I needed to convert the emlx files in the mbox container(which Windows interpreted as a folder) using mboxtoeml prior to running the program-but five mins of testing clarified the situation, no prior processing required and all was well. Great product!
Robust call center system allows prior processing of VIP customers requests(including the GOLDEN telephone line directly to administrators) and routing individual requests by their content to a specific operator according to his skill.
The Court pointed out that a product which is not itself wanted for subsequent use andwhich the holder cannot economically reuse without prior processing must be considered to be a burden which the holder seeks to discard. 50.
In addition to the criterion of whether a substance constitutes a production residue, a second relevant criterion fordetermining whether or not the substance is waste within the meaning of Directive 75/442 is thus the degree of likelihood that the substance will be reused without prior processing.
It is also agreed that, even assuming that it is technically possible,such exploiting or marketing would in any event imply prior processing operations which, far from being economically advantageous for the holder of the substance, would in fact be a significant financial burden.
A substance such as heavy fuel oil sold as a combustible fuel does not constitute waste within the meaning of Directive 75/442 on waste, as amended by Decision 96/350, where it is exploited or marketed on economically advantageous terms andis capable of actually being used as a fuel without requiring prior processing.
Such revocation of consent does not affect the legality of prior processing based on such consent(i.e. prior to its revocation) or the lawfulness of the processing of Personal Data on legal grounds other than consent(e.g. legitimate interest or fulfilment of a legal obligation).
Hydrocarbons accidentally spilled at sea following a shipwreck, mixed with water and sediment and drifting along the coast of a Member State until being washed up on that coast, constitute waste within the meaning of Article 1(a) of that directive, where they areno longer capable of being exploited or marketed without prior processing.
Where the substance or object in question is a production residue, that is to say, a product which is not itself wanted for subsequent use andwhich the holder cannot reuse on economically advantageous terms without prior processing, it must be regarded as a burden which the holder‘discards'(see Palin Granit, paragraphs 32 to 37, and Van de Walle, paragraph 46).
Hydrocarbons accidentally spilled at sea following a shipwreck, mixed with water and sediment and drifting along the coast of a Member State until being washed up on that coast, constitute waste within the meaning of Article 1(a) of Directive 75/442, as amended by Decision 96/350, where they areno longer capable of being exploited or marketed without prior processing.
Where the substance or object in question is a production residue, that is to say, a product which is not itself wanted for subsequent use andwhich the holder cannot reuse on economically advantageous terms without prior processing, it must be regarded as a burden which the holder‘discards'(see Palin Granit, paragraphs 32 to 37, and Van de Walle, paragraph 46).
The answer to the first question must therefore be that a substance such as that at issue in the main proceedings, namely heavy fuel oil sold as a combustible fuel, does not constitute waste within the meaning of Directive 75/442, where it is exploited or marketed on economically advantageous terms andis capable of actually being used as a fuel without requiring prior processing.
Having regard to the obligation to interpret the concept of waste widely in order to limit its inherent nuisance and harmful effects, the reasoning concerning by-products should be confined to situations in which the reuse of goods, materials or raw materials is not a mere possibility buta certainty, without prior processing and as an integral part of the production process(Palin Granit, paragraph 36, and order in Saetti and Frediani, paragraph 36).
Consequently, the answer to the second question must be that hydrocarbons accidentally spilled at sea following a shipwreck, mixed with water and sediment and drifting along the coast of a Member State until being washed up on that coast, constitute waste within the meaning of Article 1(a) of Directive 75/442, where they areno longer capable of being exploited or marketed without prior processing.
A substance such as that at issue in the main proceedings, namely heavy fuel oil sold as a combustible fuel, does not constitute waste within the meaning of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Commission Decision 96/350/EC of 24 May 1996, where it is exploited or marketed on economically advantageous terms andis capable of actually being used as a fuel without requiring prior processing.
If you withdraw your consent, our processing prior to your withdrawal will remain lawful.
The data subject shall have the right to receive information aboutthe facts and data relating to processing prior to processing. .