Examples of using Useful answer in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
So take your time in constructing a good and useful answer.
For the sake of clarity, and so as to give a useful answer to the referring court, I will approach the three questions as follows.
Simplifying a question makes it more likely you will get a useful answer.
When you do this, your odds of getting a useful answer and the speed with which you are likely to get that answer both improve tremendously.
For example, if you ask an interesting question or provide a useful answer, it's likely be be voted up.
Preliminary rulings- Admissibility- Limits- Clearly irrelevant questions andhypothetical questions put in a context not permitting a useful answer.
For example, if you ask an interesting question or useful answer, it will likely be voted up.
However, at the normal technical level of the question,politeness does increase the likelihood of a useful answer.
When you do this, your odds of getting a useful answer and the speed with which you are likely to get that answer both improve tremendously.
However, if you have got your technical ducks in a row,politeness does increase your chances of getting a useful answer.
The people most likely to be able to give you a useful answer are also the busiest people(also because most of their work is done by themselves).
But if you have got the rest of your ducks in a row,politeness does increase your chances of getting a quick and useful answer.
The people most likely to be able to give you a useful answer are also the busiest people(if only because they take on the most work themselves).
Preliminary rulings- Jurisdiction of the Court- Limits- Clearly irrelevant questions andhypothetical questions put in a context not permitting a useful answer.
Against this background, a useful answer to the first question requires a preliminary examination of exclusive jurisdiction under Article 24(1) and(2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling- Admissibility- Limits- Clearly irrelevant questions andhypothetical questions put in a context not permitting a useful answer.
The likelihood of receiving a useful answer increases if you clearly make it clear what you want from the respondents(provide links, send a code, check your decision, etc.).
One: being seen to invest effort in simplifying the question makes it more likely you will get an answer, Two:simplifying the question makes it more likely you will get a useful answer.
The likelihood of receiving a useful answer increases if you make it clear what you are trying to get from the respondents(provide links, send code, check your decision, etc.).
In accordance with settled case‑law, the Court of Justice can refuse to rule on a reference for a preliminaryruling where it does not have before it the factual or legal material necessary to give a useful answer to the questions referred to it.
(13) Accordingly, the information provided in an order for reference must notonly be such as to enable the Court to give a useful answer but must also enable the Governments of the Member States and other interested parties to submit observations pursuant to Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice.
I take the view that, whilst the points raised regarding the admissibility of the questions referred are perfectly understandable, the Court must, in so far as possible and in keeping with the spirit of cooperation which must guide the preliminary ruling procedure,endeavour to give a useful answer to the referring court.
Preliminary rulings- Jurisdiction of the Court- Limits- Clearly irrelevant questions andhypothetical questions put in a context not permitting a useful answer- Questions not related to the purpose of the main proceedings(Art. 234 EC)(see paras 42-44).
Consideration of the questions referred Admissibility 21 The Italian Government and, as regards the second question only, the European Commission submit that the request for a preliminary ruling should be declared inadmissible, since the order for reference does not set out the factual context sufficiently so as toallow the Court to provide a useful answer.
Preliminary rulings- Admissibility- Questions referred without sufficient explanation of the factual and legislative context-Questions referred in a context making a useful answer impossible- Manifest inadmissibility(Art. 234 EC)(see paras 29-35, operative part 2).
In order to define the scope of those questions and thus to provide a useful answer to them, it should be observed that such a concept must be understood, as is apparent from the file, as designating a succession of contracts transferring ownership which have been concluded between economic operators established in different Member States of the European Union.
The Luxembourg Bar Association also claims that the order for reference does not contain any indication as to the nature, composition and mode of functioning of the review bodies at issue in the main proceedings,which is liable to prevent the Court from providing a useful answer to the national court as regards the first two questions.
(13) Accordingly, the information provided in an order for reference must notonly be such as to enable the Court to give a useful answer but must also enable the Governments of the Member States and other interested parties to submit observations pursuant to Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice.
Consequently, it must be held that the order for reference contains the factual andlegal material necessary to enable the Court to give a useful answer to the referring court and to enable interested persons usefully to take a position on the questions referred to the Court, in accordance with the case-law referred to in paragraph 25 above.