What is the translation of " ACCESS TO RETAINED DATA " in Slovenian?

• dostopa do hranjenih podatkov
• dostop do hranjenih podatkov
• dostop do shranjenih podatkov

Examples of using Access to retained data in English and their translations into Slovenian

Access to retained data.
Dostop do hranjenih podatkov.

I would add that there is nothing theoretical about the risks of abusive or illegal access to retained data.
Naj k temu še dodam, da tveganja zlorabe dostopa ali nezakonitega dostopa do hranjenih podatkov nikakor niso teoretična.

As regards access to retained data, Section 22 of RIPA provides:.
Razdelek 22 RIPA glede dostopa do hranjenih podatkov določa:.

That conclusion is not called into question by the fact that national provisions governing access to retained data do not, as such, fall within the scope of application of the Charter.
Te ugotovitve ni mogoče ovreči z dejstvom, da nacionalne določbe, ki urejajo dostop do hranjenih podatkov, ne spadajo na področje uporabe Listine.

Access to retained data by the national authorities is governed by the provisions of Law 2012:278, the LEK and the RB.
Dostop nacionalnih organov do hranjenih podatkov urejajo določbe zakona 2012:278, LEK in RB.

In addition, the competent national authorities to whom access to retained data has been granted must notify the persons concerned of that fact.
Poleg tega morajo pristojni nacionalni organi, ki jim je bil odobren dostop do hranjenih podatkov, o tem obvestiti zadevne osebe.

Article 4 of Directive 2006/24 states that it is for the Member States to ensure that data retained‘are provided only to the competent national authorities in specific cases and in accordance with national law' and, more specifically, to define in their national law‘[t]he procedures to be followed and the conditions to be fulfilled in order to gain access to retained data'.
Člen 4 Direktive 2006/24 podrobno določa, da morajo države članice zagotoviti, da se hranjeni podatki„zagotovijo samo pristojnim nacionalnim organom za vsak primer posebej in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom“ in, natančneje, da se v nacionalnem pravu določijo„postopk[i] in pogoj[i] za pridobitev dostopa do hranjenih podatkov“.

The fact that access to retained data is restricted again means that it cannot be used for public surveillance.
Dejstvo, da je dostop do shranjenih podatkov ponovno omejen pomeni, da se ne sme uporabljati za javni nadzor.

It should further be noted that no access should be granted to‘retained data' under this Directive for other than law enforcement purposes i.e. no access to retained data for service providers of electronic communications.
Nadalje je treba upoštevati, da se za druge namene razen namene izvrševanja zakona s to direktivo ne sme odobriti dostopa do„hranjenih podatkov“,tj. ni dostopa do hranjenih podatkov za ponudnike elektronskih komunikacij.

Let us suppose, first of all, that a person who has access to retained data wishes to identify all the individuals in the Member State who have a psychological disorder.
Na prvem mestu se lahko predpostavi, da ima oseba, ki ima dostop do hranjenih podatkov, namen v populaciji države članice identificirati vse posameznike s psihološkimi motnjami.

According to that government, in the investigations aimed at dismantling the networks which organise the departure of French residents to conflict zones in Iraq and Syria, access to retained data plays a crucial role in identifying the people who facilitate those departures.
Po navedbah te vlade ima v okviru preiskav v zvezi z onesposobljenjem navez, ki organizirajo odhod oseb, ki prebivajo v Franciji, na območja spopadov v Iraku ali Siriji, dostop do hranjenih podatkov odločilno vlogo pri identifikaciji oseb, ki so olajšale tak odhod.

The directive further states that access to retained data must be defined by the internal laws of each Member State, that these provisions must comply with the European Convention on Human Rights and must, of course, respect the principles of proportionality and necessity.
Direktiva dodatno navaja, da mora opredeliti dostop do shranjenih podatkov nacionalna zakonodaja posamezne države članice, da morajo biti te določbe v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah in morajo tudi spoštovati načeli sorazmernosti in potrebe.

Having said that, it seems reasonable to me to consider that, in specific situations of extreme urgency, such as the United Kingdom Government has referred to, there may be justification for law enforcement authorities to have immediate access to retained data, without any prior review, in order to prevent the commission of a serious crime or so that the perpetrators can be prosecuted.
Naj po teh pojasnilih še dodam, da je po mojem mnenju razumno predpostaviti, da je mogoče z izjemno nujnimi trenutnimi okoliščinami, na katere se je sklicevala vlada Združenega kraljestva, utemeljiti to, da se organom pregona omogoči takojšen dostop do hranjenih podatkov brez predhodnega nadzora, da bi se tako preprečila storitev hudih kaznivih dejanj ali omogočil pregon storilcev takih dejanj.

The procedures to be followed and the conditions to be fulfilled in order to gain access to retained data in accordance with necessity and proportionality requirements shall be defined by each Member State in its national law, subject to the relevant provisions of EU law or public international law, and in particular the ECHR as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.
Vsaka država članica v nacionalnem pravu določi postopke in pogoje za pridobitev dostopa do hranjenih podatkov v skladu z zahtevami glede nujnosti in sorazmernosti, in sicer ob upoštevanju ustreznih določb prava Evropske unije ali mednarodnega javnega prava, zlasti pa EKČP, kakor jo razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice.

The second sentence states that‘[t]he procedures to be followed and the conditions to be fulfilled in order to gain access to retained data in accordance with necessity and proportionality requirements shall be defined by each Member State in its national law, subject to the relevant provisions of European Union law or public international law, and in particular the ECHR as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights'.
V drugem stavku je pojasnjeno, da„vsaka država članica v nacionalnem pravu določi postopke in pogoje za pridobitev dostopa do hranjenih podatkov v skladu z zahtevami glede nujnosti in sorazmernosti, in sicer ob upoštevanju ustreznih določb prava Evropske unije ali mednarodnega javnega prava, zlasti pa EKČP, kakor jo razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice“.

The procedures to be followed and the conditions to be fulfilled in order to gain access to retained data in accordance with necessity and proportionality requirements shall be defined by each Member State in its national law, subject to the relevant provisions of European Union law or public international law, and in particular the[European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950,] as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.'.
Vsaka država članica v nacionalnem pravu določi postopke in pogoje za pridobitev dostopa do hranjenih podatkov v skladu z zahtevami glede nujnosti in sorazmernosti, in sicer ob upoštevanju ustreznih določb prava Evropske unije ali mednarodnega javnega prava, zlasti pa EKČP, kakor jo razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice. Člen 5 Kategorije podatkov,.

The proposal leaves the choice to the Member States of which authorities should have access to data retained and under which conditions.
Izbiro, kateri organi bi morali imeti dostop do hranjenih podatkov in pod katerimi pogoji, predlog prepušča državam članicam.

Under Article 4 of Directive 2006/24, only the competent national authorities are allowed access to the data retained, which means that it is not necessarily only the judicial authorities that have such access..
V členu 4 Direktive 2006/24 je dostop do hranjenih podatkov pridržan pristojnim nacionalnim organom, kar pomeni, da ni nujno pridržan sodnim organom.

Issues of access to data retained pursuant to this Directive by national authorities for such activities as are referred to in the first indent of Article 3(2) of Directive 95/46/EC fall outside the scope of Community law.
Omogočanje dostopa do podatkov, ki jih v skladu s to direktivo hranijo nacionalni organi za dejavnosti, kakršne so naštete v prvi alinei člena 3(2) Direktive 95/46/ES,[je] zunaj področja uporabe prava Skupnosti.

Likewise, the competent national authorities to whom access to the retained data has been granted must notify the persons affected, under the applicable national procedures, as soon as that notification is no longer liable to jeopardise the investigations being undertaken by those authorities.
Prav tako je pomembno, da pristojni nacionalni organi, ki jim je bil odobren dostop do hranjenih podatkov, v okviru veljavnih nacionalnih postopkov o tem obvestijo zadevne osebe takoj, ko to sporočilo ne more ogroziti preiskav, ki jih vodijo ti organi.

Such a framework would consist of“a more flexible approach to one of the three aspects identified by the Court(such as access to the retained data) may be compensated by a stricter approach to the other two aspects(the retention period and the security and protection of the data)”.
Nemška vlada je to tezo ponazorila z zakonom„veznih posod“, po katerem bi bilo mogoče prožnejši pristop v zvezi z enim od treh vidikov, ki jih je opredelilo Sodišče(na primer dostopom do hranjenih podatkov), izravnati s strožjim pristopom v zvezi s preostalima vidikoma(trajanjem hrambe ter varnostjo in varstvom podatkov)..

Accordingly, Section 1 of DRIPA is not compatible with the Charter as it does not lay down clear and precise rules providing for access to and use of retained data and because access to that data is not made dependent on prior review by a court or an independent administrative body.
Razdelek 1 DRIPA naj torej ne bi bil združljiv s členoma 7 in 8 Listine, ker naj ne bi določal jasnih in natančnih pravil v zvezi z dostopom in uporabo hranjenih podatkov in ker naj za dostop do teh podatkov ne bi določal predhodnega nadzora s strani sodišča ali neodvisnega upravnega organa.

In particular, the Commission should ensure more harmonisation in specific areas, such as: the measures ensuring the respect for fundamental rights and freedoms, including the data retention periods, the purpose limitations, as well as the necessary safeguards to access retained data and protect personal data..
Komisija mora na določenih področjih zagotoviti večjo usklajenost, na primer uskladitev ukrepov za zagotavljanje spoštovanja temeljnih človekovih pravic in svoboščin, vključno z dolžino obdobja hrambe podatkov, omejitvijo namena, pa tudi potrebnimi varovalnimi ukrepi za dostop do shranjenih podatkov in varstvom osebnih podatkov..

Lastly, I would add that, from a practical point of view, none of the three parties concerned by a request for access is in a position to carry out an effective review in connection with access to the retained data.
Nazadnje, naj še dodam, da ni s praktičnega vidika nobena od treh strank, ki jih vloga za dostop zadeva, sposobna dejansko nadzirati dostopa do hranjenih podatkov.

Similarly, a national regime that provided for a retention period of three months and the retention of the data in encrypted form within the national territory(representing a strict approach to retention period and security), but which allowed all employees of all public authorities access to the retained data(representing a flexible approach to access) would expose the entire population to a significant risk of abuse on the part of the national authorities.
Enako bi bila z nacionalno ureditvijo, ki bi določala trimesečno trajanje hrambe ter hrambo podatkov na nacionalnem ozemlju in v šifrirani obliki(strog pristop glede trajanja in varnosti), vsem uslužbencem vseh javnih organov pa bi omogočala dostop do hranjenih podatkov(prožen pristop glede dostopa), celotna populacija izpostavljena velikemu tveganju zlorabe od nacionalnih organov.226.

The difficulty which Directive 2006/24 raises, I would again like to repeat, is that it is a directive which seeks only to impose an obligation on the providers of electronic communications services to collect and retain traffic and location data for electronic communications, not to lay down the safeguards which must govern access to the retained data and their use.
Težava pri Direktivi 2006/24 je, če ponovim, ,da določa zgolj obveznost ponudnikov elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, da zbirajo in hranijo podatke o prometu in lokaciji elektronskih komunikacij, ne določa pa zaščitnih ukrepov, ki morajo veljati za dostop do hranjenih podatkov in njihovo uporabo.

However, on the other hand, it is imperative to‘oblige[the government] to control itself', with respect to both the retention of data and access to the data retained, given the grave risks engendered by the existence of databases which encompass all communications made within the national territory.
Po drugi strani pa je nujno„vlado prisiliti k temu, da bo nadzorovala samo sebe“, in sicer tako v zvezi s hrambo kot tudi z dostopom do hranjenih podatkov, saj so tveganja, ki nastanejo z obstojem takih podatkovnih zbirk, ki vključujejo vse komunikacije, opravljene na nacionalnem ozemlju, zelo velika.