What is the translation of " RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTS " in Slovenian?

• randomizirani nadzorovani poskusi
• naključno nadzorovanih poskusov
• randomizirane kontrolirane eksperimente
• randomizirane kontrolirane poskuse
• randomiziranih kontroliranih poskusov
• randomizirani kontrolirani poskusi

Examples of using Randomized controlled experiments in English and their translations into Slovenian

In other words, randomized controlled experiments are a solution to the problems of confounders.
Z drugimi besedami, randomizirani kontrolirani poskusi so rešitev problemov zmedenih.

This ability to randomize on top of tracking means that online stores can constantly run randomized controlled experiments.
Ta zmožnost randomizacije na vrhu sledenja pomeni, da lahko spletne trgovine stalno vodijo randomizirane kontrolirane poskuse.

In other words, randomized controlled experiments are a solution to the problems of confounders.
Z drugimi besedami, randomizirani nadzorovani poskusi rešitev za probleme confounders.

This ability to randomize on top of tracking means that online stores can constantly run randomized controlled experiments.
Ta sposobnost, da naključen na vrhu sledenje pomeni, da lahko spletne trgovine teče nenehno randomizirane kontrolirane eksperimente.

Randomized controlled experiments can take many forms and can be used to study many types of behavior.
Randomizirani nadzorovani poskusi lahko različne oblike in se lahko uporablja za študij veliko vrst vedenja.

Fair comparisons can come from either randomized controlled experiments or natural experiments..
Poštene primerjave lahko prihajajo iz bodisi naključno nadzorovanih poskusov ali naravnih eksperimentov.

In particular, the experiment of Schultz and colleagues doesn't really have a control group in the same way that randomized controlled experiments do.
Še posebej, poskus Schultz in kolegov sploh nima kontrolne skupine na enak način, da randomizirano kontrolirano poskusi narediti.

Then, in partnership with researchers, Opower ran randomized controlled experiments to assess the impact of the Home Energy Reports.
Potem, v sodelovanju z raziskovalci, Opower tekel naključno nadzorovanih poskusov za ocenjevanje vpliva poročil notranje energije.

In particular, the experiment of Schultz and colleagues doesn't really have a control group in the same way that randomized controlled experiments do.
Še posebej eksperiment Schultza in kolegov v resnici nima kontrolne skupine na enak način, kot to opravljajo randomizirani kontrolirani poskusi.

Then, in partnership with researchers, Opower ran randomized controlled experiments to assess the impact of the Home Energy Reports.
Potem je v sodelovanju z raziskovalci Opower vodil randomizirane kontrolirane poskuse, da bi ocenil učinek teh poročil o energetiki.

Randomized controlled experiments have proven to be a powerful way to learn about the social world, and in this chapter, I will show you more about how to use them in your research.
Randomizirani nadzorovani poskusi so se izkazali za močan način za spoznavanje družbenega sveta, v tem poglavju pa vam bom pokazal več o tem, kako jih uporabiti v vaši raziskavi.

Despite the important differences between experiments and randomized controlled experiments, social researchers often use these terms interchangeably.
Kljub pomembnih razlik med poskusi in randomiziranih kontroliranih poskusov, družboslovni raziskovalci pogosto uporabljajo te izraze izmenično.

Randomized controlled experiments have proven to be a powerful way to learn about the social world, and in this chapter, I will show you more about how to use them in your research.
Randomizirani nadzorovani poskusi so se izkazali kot učinkovit način za spoznavanje socialnega sveta, in v tem poglavju, se bom naučil več o tem, kako jih uporabiti v raziskavah.

Often natural experiments are the best way to estimate cause-and-effect relationships in settings where it is not ethical or practical to run randomized controlled experiments.
Pogosto naravne poskusi so najboljši način za oceno vzročno-posledičnih razmerij v okoljih, kjer to ni etično in praktično teči randomiziranih kontroliranih poskusov.

In particular, I will show how randomized controlled experiments- where the researcher intervenes in the world in a very specific way- enable researchers to learn about causal relationships.
Še posebej, bom pokazal, kako randomiziranih kontroliranih poskusov, kjer je raziskovalec poseže v svetu na zelo specifičen način omogočiti raziskovalcem, da spoznajo vzročnih odnosov.

In addition to mass surveillance, researchers- again in collaboration with companies and governments- can increasingly intervene in people's lives in order to create randomized controlled experiments.
Poleg množičnega nadzora lahko raziskovalci- v sodelovanju s podjetji in vladami- vedno bolj posegajo v življenja ljudi, da bi ustvarili naključno nadzorovane poskuse.

In chapter 4, I will describe how randomized controlled experiments can help researchers make causal estimates, and here I will describe how researchers can take advantage of natural experiments, such as the draft lottery.
V 4. poglavju bom opisal, kako lahko randomizirani kontrolirani poskusi pomagajo raziskovalcem, da pripravijo vzročne ocene, in tukaj bom opisal, kako lahko raziskovalci izkoristijo naravne eksperimente, kot je osnutek loterije.

Chapters 1 and 2 of Freedman, Pisani, and Purves(2007) offer a clear introduction into the differences between experiments, controlled experiments, and randomized controlled experiments.
Poglavja 1 in 2 Freedman, Pisani,and Purves(2007) ponujajo jasen uvod v razlike med poskusi, nadzorovanih poskusov in naključno nadzorovanih poskusov.

In addition to mass surveillance, researchers- again in collaboration with companies and governments- can increasingly intervene in people's lives in order to create randomized controlled experiments.
Poleg tega množičnega nadzora, raziskovalci-spet v sodelovanju s podjetji in vladami, lahko bolj sistematično poseže v življenje ljudi, da bi ustvarili randomizirane kontrolirane eksperimente.

Chapters 1 and 2 of Freedman, Pisani, and Purves(2007) offer a clear introduction to the differences between experiments, controlled experiments, and randomized controlled experiments.
V poglavjih 1 in 2 Freedman, Pisani,and Purves(2007) je jasno predstavljen razlike med eksperimenti, nadzorovanimi eksperimenti in randomiziranimi kontroliranimi eksperimenti.

They were running a randomized controlled experiment.
So bili teče randomizirano kontrolirano eksperiment.

For example, rather than running a randomized controlled experiment, the researchers could have exploited a natural experiment..
Na primer, namesto da bi izvajali naključno nadzorovan poskus, bi raziskovalci lahko izkoristili naravni poskus..

One way to answer this question would be with a randomized controlled experiment where workers were randomly assigned to either receive training or not receive training.
Eden od načinov za odgovor na to vprašanje bi bilo z randomizirani nadzorovani poskus, kjer so delavci naključno dodeljena bodisi usposabljajo ali ne usposabljajo.

See Dehejia and Wahba(1999) for an example where matching methods were able to produce estimates similar to those from a randomized controlled experiment.
Glej Dehejiaand Wahba(1999) za primer, pri katerem so metode ujemanja lahko Dehejiaand Wahba(1999) ocene, podobne tistim iz randomiziranega kontroliranega preizkusa.

Further, non-experimental approaches can be helpful if you want to take advantage of data that already exist in order to design a randomized controlled experiment.
Poleg tega so lahko neeksperimentalni pristopi v pomoč, če želite izkoristiti že obstoječe podatke, da oblikujete naključno nadzorovan preskus.

For example, everyone accepts that smoking causes cancer even though we have never done a randomized controlled experiment that forces people to smoke.
Na primer, vsakdo priznava, da kajenje povzroča raka, čeprav še nismo opravili randomizirano kontrolirano poskus, zaradi katerega ljudje kadijo.

In other words, with a randomized controlled experiment you can be sure that any differences in outcomes are caused by the intervention and not a confounder, a claim that I make precise in the Technical Appendix using the potential outcomes framework.
Z drugimi besedami, s randomizirani nadzorovani poskus, ste lahko prepričani, da so razlike v rezultatih s posredovanjem in ni povzročil confounder, trditev, da sem bi natančno opredeljeno v Tehnični prilogi uporabo okvira možnih rezultatov.