Examples of using The principle of equality before the law in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
Pollard's punishment and the principle of equality before the law.
The principle of equality before the law does not allow the legislator to regulate identical situation in a different manner.
Is not inconsistent with the principle of equality before the law.
The principle of equality before the law requires that the legislature regulate essentially equal positions of legal entities equally, and different positions accordingly differently.
Asymmetric enforcement of the law would undermine the principle of equality before the law.
These provisions are in line with relevant provisions of the Charter,including the protection of personal data, the principle of equality before the law, and the general prohibition of discrimination.
In writing.-(PL) The issue dealt with by the rapporteur invites reflection on how to reconcilesupport for consolidation of a system of genuine competition with the principle of equality before the law.
Article 29 of the Lithuanian Constitution proclaims the principle of equality before the law for all citizens regardless of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, social status, belief, convictions, or views.
Accordingly, ROV struck back by suing the Železniki municipality for a"serious violation of constitutionallyprotected human rights, particularly the principle of equality before the law, freedom of expression and freedom of art."[59].
In accordance with the established constitutional case law, the principle of equality before the law determined by the second paragraph of Article 14 of the Constitution requires that essentially equal situations be treated equally.
Allegedly, the prohibition on striking entails a violation of the principle of equality before the law in comparison with the regulation of strikes by police employees, whose right to strike is only restricted, but not prohibited.
It therefore respects the fundamental rights and freedoms and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,including the right to protection of personal data, the principle of equality before the law and the general prohibition of discrimination.
The principle of equality before the law does not entail that the law may not regulate the positions of legal subjects differently, but that such different treatment may not be arbitrary and without sound and objective reasons.
A hit in the ECRIS-TCN system by itself shouldnot therefore be used to undermine the principle of equality before the law, the right to a fair trial,the presumption of innocence or the general prohibition of discrimination.
The principle of equality before the law, however, also does not preventthe legislator to define within their competencies the criteria pursuant to which it will differentiate between certain similar states of facts and apply to them different legal consequences.
Therefore, the Rapporteur has included an amendment to make it clear that a hit in the ECRIS-TCN system by itself should not beused to affect a judicial outcome by undermining the principle of equality before the law, the right to a fair trial,the presumption of innocence or the general prohibition of discrimination.
This is why the sodetermined criteria are not in conflict with the principle of equality before the law(article 14 of the Constitution), for different social position can involve a different actual state, and the latter justifies the application of a different norm.
In an economic sense, the challenged measure therefore has similar effects as if the state allowed the bankruptcy of the bank and then allocated compensation for the lost legal positions or unpaid claims,by its own discretion and by taking into account the principle of equality before the law, only to ordinary creditors of the bank, but not also to subordinated creditors.
In the opinion of the National Assembly,the impugned legal provisions do not violate the principle of equality before the law, since it is necessary to bear in mind in this the general reasons already mentioned for tightening up conditions for the payment of personal income for occasional work.
The principle of equality before the law requires that in cases when the reduction of so far existing receipts has grounds in the Constitution this reduction must be applied to all beneficiaries at the same time, yet then all decisions must be issued prior to this reduction, not subsequently with retroactive effect.
He also claims that the principle of equality before the law has been infringed, for in the case of the parties concerned under article 155 of the SZ the provisions of paragraph 2 of article 54(on fully equivalent replacement apartment) and of paragraph 3 of the same article(the restitution of the costs of moving house) do not apply.
The principle of equality before the law is at present under threat from the complexity and number of rules in force and difficult access to applicable law and law in preparation; however, the need for legislation to be intelligible and accessible must be the guiding principle in both simplifying the acquis and drafting new legislative proposals.
As to the alleged inconsistency with the principle of equality before the law as determined by the second paragraph of Article 14 of the Constitution,the National Assembly and the Government explain that for certain securities issued by a bank a foreign law can apply in the sense that it is applicable for the content of the issuer's liabilities and/or for the form of the security at issue.
The principle of equality before the law(the second paragraph of Article 14 of the Constitution) is allegedly affected due to the fact that the possibility to balance the predominant public interest with the possibility to deny access to information from contractual relations when such would be a significant detriment to the competitive position of the banks on the market is excluded, which worsens the competitive position of the debtors referred to in Article 1 of the APIA-D.
Whereas the Union is bound by Articles 20 and21 of the Charter to uphold the principles of equality before the law and freedom from discrimination;