Examples of using ASIPI in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
ASIPI present at the meeting of ITechLaw.
Inter-American Intellectual Property Association- ASIPI.
ASIPI continues to strengthen ties with sister.
Inter-American Association of Industrial Property ASIPI.
New ASIPI members, first-time attendees and Mentors.
Inter-American Association of Industrial Property(ASIPI) 71.
We will exchange information on GIs and related issues with ASIPI as well as promote within our respective networks initiatives in favour of GIs.
Mr. Noyola is the author of different publications about Intellectual Property, andhe participates in the events of INTA and ASIPI annually.
ASIPI understands that the enforcement of both IPRs and antitrust laws is of fundamental importance to foster economic development and innovation.
Polanco was appointed Venezuelan delegate at the Administrative Council of ASIPI(attends the annual conferences since 1993), and President of the Venezuela Group at AIPPI.
Therefore, ASIPI understands that the WTO should establish a framework also on Corporate Governance, especially as regards the enforcement of the principles of disclosure and fairness.
In addition, considering that the costly penitentiary system usually does not succeed in making good citizens out of criminals and, therefore,that the imprisonment penalty should be applied only as a last resort, ASIPI suggests to those countries bearing criminal procedure and penalties in the field of the Intellectual Property to create punitive compensation as an alternative to be applied by judges in cases of industrial and intellectual property violations.
In light of the above, ASIPI understands that damages should be compensated according to the most favorable criteria to the owner of the industrial right violated, who should be able to choose among the following.
ASIPI notes, however, that the difficulty in proving the damages effectively suffered is leading those who had their rights infringed to receive compensations corresponding to an amount usually inferior than the damage caused.
In these circumstances, andin light of all the above, ASIPI believes that the financial autonomy of National Offices should be clearly made an obligation under TRIPs so that they may duly comply with articles 41 to 49 of TRIPs.
For that, ASIPI suggests that the working group studying the relationship between trade and investment should also study the interaction between trade and governance, aiming at establishing general rules to serve as guidelines to governments and private actors.
It is with regret, however, that ASIPI notes that the National Patent and Trademark Offices are not performing their functions with the necessary agility and in accordance with the TRIPs standards.
ASIPI believes that WIPO and UNESCO should increase and intensify their work in the field of folklore protection, by including in future work related to this area the development of an effective regime at an international level for the protection of expressions of folklore.
The Inter-American Association of Industrial Property, ASIPI, is a non-profit organization which groups a large number of professionals and persons working with industrial property belonging to countries of very different development level in the Americas.
ASIPI understands that it is important to maintain a balance between protection against misappropriation9 of biological resources, traditional knowledge and expressions of folklore, on the one hand, and of freedom and encouragement of their further development and dissemination, on the other.
ASIPI, supporting the communication from Canada, submitted on March 12, 2003(WT/WGTCP/W/226)5, understands that developing common core principles is likely to reduce conflicts between jurisdictions and to improve institutional capacity of competition regimes in developing and least-developed countries.
Therefore, although ASIPI supports the ongoing negotiations to establish a system of notification of geographical indications, ASIPI notes that there are still many delicate issues pending which should be solved paying due regard to the different interest and legal systems involved.
On the other hand, although ASIPI believes in the importance of protecting biological resources, folklore and traditional knowledge, this issue should not constitute a distraction to deviate the attention from the subsidy that the centralized international registration system, the expansion of which is being proposed, represents to the large holders and exporters of I.
ASIPI, therefore, expects that at least the existing rights and obligations, especially those of the TRIPs Agreement, even if later also covered by bilateral or regional agreements, be maintained under the Dispute Settlement Understanding System of WTO when the parties of these agreements, being also parties of the WTO, so desire.
ASIPI considers that it is of fundamental importance that Geographical Indications be granted an equal level of protection to the one conferred to other types of intellectual property, especially on account of the express recognition of Geographical Indications as a type of Intellectual property, according to section 3 of the TRIPs Agreement.
In this regard, ASIPI notes with interest the proposal to introduce a system such as a“self- standing disclosure requirement” on biological resource and traditional knowledge and agrees that such mechanism would help WTO Members to keep track, at a global level, of all patent applications for which they themselves had granted access.