Examples of using Existence of a consistent pattern in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The amounts awarded range from $1,000 to $30,000. These awards amply demonstrate the existence of a consistent pattern of human rights violations.
It refers to the Committee's case law that the existence of a consistent pattern of gross violations of human rights is not sufficient on its own to meet the requirements of article 3.
In order to do so, it must, in accordance with article 3, paragraph 2, of the Convention, take into account all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass human rights violations.
In other words, the existence of a consistent pattern of violations of human rights within the meaning of article 3, paragraph 2, lends force to the Committee's belief that substantial grounds exist within the meaning of paragraph 1.
Counsel reiterates that numerous human rights reports provide evidence of the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in Spain.
It follows that the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in a country does not as such constitute a sufficient ground for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon his or her return to that country.
It must take account of all relevant considerations as called for by article 3, paragraph 2,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
The circumstances in the case,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross violations of human rights in Turkey and the fact that the author is a victim of torture, clearly show that his return to Turkey would expose him to a particular risk of being subjected to torture again.
In evaluating the risk of torture, the Committee must take account of all relevant considerations, pursuant to article 3, paragraph 2, of the Convention,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
The purpose of the complaint procedure was to determine the existence of a consistent pattern of gross and reliably attested violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
When considering claims for asylum, Zambia's legislative, judicial and administrative measures take into account other relevant considerations, where applicable,such as the existence of a consistent pattern of gross flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
In accordance with the Committee's jurisprudence, the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violation of human rights in a country does not of itself constitute sufficient grounds for determining whether the person in question would be at risk of being subjected to torture upon return to that country.
In evaluating the risk of torture, the Committee must take into account all relevant considerations, pursuant to article 3, paragraph 2, of the Convention,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
According to the Committee,"the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violation of human rights in a country does not of itself constitute sufficient grounds for determining whether the person in question would be at risk of being subjected to torture upon return to that country","nor does the absence of such a situation mean that a person cannot be considered at risk of being subjected to torture.
In assessing this risk, the Committee must take into account all relevant considerations, pursuant to article 3, paragraph 2, of the Convention,including past incidents of torture or the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
The State party submits that the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in a country does not as such constitute sufficient grounds for determining that a particular person would be at risk of being subjected to torture upon his or her return to that country, and recalls the Committee's jurisprudence in that regard.
In assessing whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if returned to Sudan, the Committee must take account of all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
The Committee observes that the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in a country does not as such constitute a sufficient ground for determining that a particular person was in danger of being subjected to torture upon his return to that country; additional grounds must exist to show that the individual concerned was personally at risk.
In assessing whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if returned to Belarus, the Committee must take account of all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
On the merits,the State party recalls that the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in a country does not as such constitute sufficient grounds for determining that a person would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon his return to that country and the individual must show that he/she faces a foreseeable, real and personal risk of being tortured.
In assessing whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if returned to Turkey, the Committee must take account of all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in Turkey.
It also recalls that the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights does not constitute sufficient reason for concluding that a particular individual is likely to be subjected to torture on return to his or her country, and that additional grounds must exist before the likelihood of torture can be deemed to be,"foreseeable, real and personal", for the purposes of article 3, paragraph 1; the risk in question must also be serious.
The State party recalls that, when determining whether the forced return of a person to another country would constitute a violation of article 3,the Committee must take into account all relevant considerations including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in that country.
On the merits of his brother's case, the complainant refers to the Committee's jurisprudence that it must take into account all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in the country of extradition, and maintains, on the basis of numerous reports, that the practice of such violations is systematic in Uzbekistan.
In making this assessment, the State party has taken into account the jurisprudence of the Committee establishing that a person must show that he or she faces a real, foreseeable andpersonal risk of being subjected to torture, as well as the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
In assessing whether the State party's extradition of the alleged victim to Tunisia was in violation of article 3 of the Convention, the Committee must take into account all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
In assessing whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if returned to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Committee must take account of all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
In order to determine whether, at the time of removal, there were substantial reasons for believing that the complainants would be in danger of being subjected to torture if they were returned to India, the Committee must take into account all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
In assessing whether the extradition of the complainant to the Russian Federation violated the State party's obligations under article 3, of the Convention, the Committee must take account of all relevant considerations,including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
In order to assess whether there are serious grounds to believe that a complainant would be at risk of torture in case of forcible removal, the Committee must take into account all pertinent considerations,in particular the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights in the receiving State.