Examples of using Source contends in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The source contends that Mr. Shamoun's detention which has lasted for 26 years is arbitrary and manifestly lacks any legal basis.
Ahmed Amar, a Lebanese citizen, was allegedly arrested on 1 September 1986; the source contends that he was arrested without a warrant by members of the Israeli Defence Forces.
The source contends that nothing but an alternative order prohibiting his leaving the country, which he had not been notified of, had been issued.
In the present case the source contends that Cao Maobing has been held since December 2000 in Yancheng City No. 4 Psychiatric Hospital without being able to leave it.
The source contends that Mr. López Mendoza's current detention comes against a backdrop of harassment and persecution dating back 10 years.
The source contends that Mr. Rahman's arrest and detention are a direct consequence of his exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression.
The source contends that Su Su Nway had not been informed in a timely manner about the charges against her and was thus unable to effectively prepare her defence.
In this case, the source contends that a reasonable observer would qualify the grounds on which the court convicted both singers as an indication of bias.
The source contends that Mr. Al Uteibi's deprivation of liberty is a direct consequence of his peaceful exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression.
The source contends that Mr. Tarabin was not present at the trial and upon arrest he was not given the opportunity to be promptly brought before a competent tribunal.
The source contends that the legal basis underlying the continued detention of Mr. Palani is not in conformity with the applicable international norms and standards.
Moreover, the source contends that Mr. Aly's deprivation of liberty is arbitrary on the grounds that it is in violation with minimum guarantees enshrined in his right to a fair trial.
The source contends that Mr. Al Uteibi has been unable to contest the legality of his arrest and detention before a competent authority and has been deprived of the possibility to seek legal assistance.
The source contends that this runs contrary to section 267 of the Malawi Criminal Procedure and Evidence Code, which requires that remand be reviewed or renewed every 15 days.
In particular, the source contends that Mr. Kassem was arrested and detained without a court order and he was not informed of any reasons justifying his arrest and detention.
The source contends, however, that the Viet Tan, with members in Viet Nam and among the Vietnamese diaspora, aims to establish democracy and reform Viet Nam through peaceful means.
The source contends that, instead of releasing Mr. Abdelhalem, the Ministry of Interior transferred him temporarily to another location before issuing a new administrative detention order.
The source contends that Mr. Al Zumer's second conviction was in violation of the non bis in idem principle as set out inter alia in article 14(7) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The source contends that Mr. Quan was targeted by the State authorities in Viet Nam for arrest and detention on the basis of his expression of his political opinions and that his arrest and detention is arbitrary.
Furthermore, the source contends that his detention follows directly from Mr. Tabarzadi's exercise of the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and association and to take part in the conduct of public affairs.
The source contends that Mr. Obaidullah has been detained for more than 10 years without charge or trial, and that he has not been provided an administrative review of his detention since 2007.
In the present case the source contends that Wang Wanxing had been held from 3 June 1992 to 19 August 1999(and thereafter again from 23 November 1999 onwards) in Ankang Hospital without being allowed to leave it.
The source contends that the Government does not specifically deny that the three hearings(on 24 November 2009, 18 January 2010 and 8 August 2010) were closed to the public in violation of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
The source contends that there is no material evidence against Thagyi Maung Zeya and Sithu Zeya to convict them, and the police cases were exclusively based on confessions extracted through the alleged use of torture and drugging.
The source contends that Mr. Soltani has pursued legitimate and peaceful human rights activities in accordance with international human rights law notwithstanding acts of harassment and pressure to which he has been subjected.
The source contends that his detention runs counter to article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR), article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights(UDHR) and article 29 of the Constitution of Ethiopia.
The source contends that Mr. Al-Hweiti's deprivation of liberty is a direct consequence of his pacific exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, as guaranteed in article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The source contends that by not disclosing information about Mr. Jalilov's hearings to his family or lawyer and/or holding closed hearings, the Government of Uzbekistan breached Mr. Jalilov's legitimate right to a fair and public trial.
Furthermore, the source contends that his detention contravenes article 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure(Law No. 23/2004), which provides that any arrest or detention can only be ordered by the competent authorities and in accordance with the law.
The source contends that Mr. Alkhodr's detention is in violation of well-established international human rights norms and is a direct consequence of his exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression as recognized in article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.