Examples of using Linear combination in English and their translations into Turkish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Clearly this is just another linear combination.
So vector 3 is a linear combination of these other two vectors.
So when we add this new element here,we know that it can be written as a linear combination of the other one.
So no linear combination of these 0's can equal this 1.
Because we care about any linear combination of these.
Such a linear combination is called a convex combination. .
So depending on our vector x, we're taking a linear combination of the column vectors of A.
A related idea to this, and notice, you had two vectors,but it kind of reduced to one vector when you took its linear combinations.
This is clearly another linear combination of these three vectors.
Which is essentially finding a linear combination that will equal your vector.
The linear combinations given in the table for the K0 S and K0 L are not exactly correct, since there is a small correction due to CP violation.
If they're linearly independent weknow that a2 cannot be represented as some linear combination of the rest of these guys.
So if I just take a linear combination of all of these guys, I'm going to get another member of Rm.
So to show that just these three vectors by themselves span our column space,we just have to show that I can represent a3 and a5 as linear combinations of a1, a2.
Step function: A finite linear combination of indicator functions of half-open intervals.
If any two functions are solutions to Laplace's equation(or any linear homogeneous differential equation),their sum(or any linear combination) is also a solution.
And I think you can clearly see that if you take a linear combination of any of these two, you can represent anything in R2.
If you took linear combinations of these two things,… you would get a plane that both of these would lie on.
If you multiply all of these guys by 0, which is a valid linear combination added up, you will see that it contains the 0 vector.
Because any linear combination of them, or linear combinations of them can be used to construct the non-pivot columns, and they're linearly independant.
Let's pick one of the elements. Let me define, let me just call u to be the set--the set of all linear combinations of this is the span. So let me just define u to be the span.
And so you can't take any linear combinations to get to that 1 because 0 times anything, minus or plus 0 times anything, can never be equal to 1.
This is a set of functions, usually centered on the different atoms in the molecule,which are used to expand the molecular orbitals with the linear combination of atomic orbitals(LCAO) molecular orbital method ansatz.
Other algebraic properties====* Any linear combination of even functions is even, and the even functions form a vector space over the reals.
And just to get a gut feel if you're just looking at something, whether it's going to be a linear transformation or not,if the transformation just involves linear combinations of the different components of the inputs, you're probably dealing with a linear transformation.
So if it's allof r2 that means the linear combination of this could be-- we could always construct anything in r2 with the linear combination of this.
But I won't cover that in this video just for brevity.But you can interpret it as a weighted combination, or a linear combination of the column vectors of A, where the matrix X dictates what the weights on each of the columns are.
More technically,when does the actual quantum state stop being a linear combination of states, each of which resembles different classical states, and instead begin to have a unique classical description?
More technically, when does the actualquantum state stop being a non-trivial linear combination of states, each of which resembles different classical states, and instead begin to have a unique classical description?