China is not the only authoritarian regime in the world but it's undoubtedly the wealthiest, strongest and most developed in machine learning and artificial intelligence.".
China-EU relations, foreign policy analysis, Chinese model of governance,Chinese foreign policy, authoritarian regimes(stability of), IR in Asia, state-business relations.
What I discover significantly disturbing is that the devices of management developed bysynthetic intelligence give an inherent benefit to authoritarian regimes over open societies.
China isn't the one authoritarian regime on the earth, but it surely's undoubtedly the wealthiest, strongest and most developed in machine studying and synthetic intelligence.
What I find particularly disturbing is usually that will the instruments of control developed byartificial intelligence give an inherent advantage to authoritarian regimes over open societies.
Will religious policy join a number ofother case examples showing the"resilience of an authoritarian regime" in China where the one-party dictatorship by the Communist Party continues, or will it trigger something new?
On the contrary, Indonesia has been ruled by authoritarian regimes for a long time, but after the Suharto regime collapsed in 1998, democratization made progress.
Throughout much of humanhistory societies have been governed under authoritarian systems, in particular dictatorial or autocratic systems, resulting in a wide variety of thrones that have been used by given heads of state.
On the other hand,Indonesia has been ruled by authoritarian regimes for a long time, but after the Suharto regime collapsed in 1998, its democracy rapidly progressed.
On the contrary, Indonesia has been ruled by authoritarian regimes for a long time, but after the Suharto regime collapsed in 1998, democratization made progress.
On the other hand,Indonesia has been ruled by authoritarian regimes for a long time, but after the Suharto regime collapsed in 1998, its democracy rapidly progressed.
In this perspective, the caliphate is interpreted as a symptom of the malaise in the region, a sort of response in thereligious to popular discontent due to the presence of authoritarian regimes, Syria, or favoring particular parts of a country, such as the Scythians in Iraq.
In the face of the multiplication of the enemies acting against the revolution of the Syrian people, we see that only the conscious and organized masses led by a truly revolutionary leadership are able to defeat these reactionary forces hostile to the revolution,to defeat the authoritarian regime, and also to defeat the imperialist intervention.
Proponents of terrorism and guerrillaism are to be opposed because their actions are vanguardist and authoritarian, because their ideas, to the extent that they are substantial, are wrong or unrelated to the results of their actions(especially when they call themselves libertarians or anarchists), because their killing cannot be justified,and finally because their actions produce either repression with nothing in return, or an authoritarian regime.
日本語
中文
عربى
Български
বাংলা
Český
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
עִברִית
हिंदी
Hrvatski
Magyar
Bahasa indonesia
Italiano
Қазақ
한국어
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa malay
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenský
Slovenski
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Tagalog
Turkce
Українська
اردو
Tiếng việt