Voorbeelden van het gebruik van Netto supermarkt in het Engels en hun vertalingen in het Nederlands
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Programming
NETTO SUPERMARKT gives the following.
Governments of Germany and Poland as well as by the Commission and Netto Supermarkt.
Netto Supermarkt objected to that refusal decision.
Both the Commission and Netto Supermarkt maintain 7 that where the supplier has.
The fraudulent conduct was discovered in 1998, when Netto Supermarkt contacted.
NETTO SUPERMARKT that the granting of such a protection with regard to export-supplies should not be possible.
In view of the circumstances and the contribution of Netto Supermarkt to the discovery of the fraudulent actions.
Netto Supermarkt challenged that decision by appeal to the Finanzgericht(Finance Court),
In the main proceedings, the Bundesfinanzhof has to decide on the appeal brought by Netto Supermarkt against the judgment of the Finance Court.
Netto Supermarkt GmbH& Co. OHG v Finanzamt Malchin Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.
In addition, the Finanzamt considered that the fact that Netto Supermarkt had contributed to elucidating the facts did not affect the amount of VAT payable by that company.
Netto Supermarkt GmbH& Co. OHG,
It may be added in that regard that it appears from the order for reference that even the customs authorities contacted by Netto Supermarkt were unable, without more,
In its appeal, Netto Supermarkt also relies on the principle of fairness laid down in Paragraph 227 of the 1977 Tax Code.
the referring court starts in that regard from the assumption that Netto Supermarkt, the taxable person, acted in good faith,
In 1998 Netto Supermarkt asked the Hauptzollamt Neubrandenburg(Principal Customs Office,
From this it cannot, however, as the Commission and Netto Supermarkt have rightly observed,
NETTO SUPERMARKT pointed out that, whilst it is legitimate for the Member State to seek to preserve the rights of the Treasury as effectively as possible,
The reference was made in the course of proceedings between Netto Supermarkt GmbH& Co. OHG(‘Netto Supermarkt') and Finanzamt Malchin(Tax Office, Malchin,‘the Finanzamt') regarding the refusal of the latter to grant Netto Supermarkt exemption from value added tax(‘VAT')
NETTO SUPERMARKT at issue, the conditions for an exemption of Netto Supermarkt on the grounds of the protection of legitimate expectations
According to the Finanzamt, Netto Supermarkt should have examined the genuineness of the proofs of export earlier
NETTO SUPERMARKT in point 53 of his Opinion,
In support of the appeal, Netto Supermarkt essentially submits that the Finance Court should have treated the supplies to Polish purchasers as exempt from tax by applying Paragraph 6a(4)
Case C-271/06: Netto Supermarkt GmbH& Co. OHG v Finanzamt Malchin(Sixth VAT Directive- Article 15(2)- Exemption for supplies of goods for export to a destination outside the Community- Conditions for exemption not fulfilled- Proof of export falsified by the purchaser- Supplier acting with due commercial care)(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof). I- 771.
Netto Supermarkt brought an appeal before the Bundesfinanzhof(Federal Finance Court),