Примеры использования Afiuni на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Judge Afiuni has already spent two years in detention.
The Working Group considers the action against Ms. Afiuni as a measure of reprisal.
Judge Afiuni was the subject of two other joint communications, sent on 1 April and 26 July 2010.
It calls on the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to immediately release Ms. Afiuni and to provide her with effective reparations.
Judge Afiuni is said to have been charged with corruption, being an accessory to an escape, criminal conspiracy and abuse of power.
In her response during the interactive dialogue, the Special Rapporteur reiterated her concern at the detention of Judge Afiuni and asked that she be freed.
Judge Afiuni, in consultation with her legal counsel, had indicated that she would not enter the trial chamber to challenge violations of her right to due process.
The World Alliance for Citizen Participation-CIVICUS noted the rejection of the repeated requests by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention to free Judge Afiuni.
The Government also reported that Ms. Afiuni was currently under house arrest for the duration of the treatment of an illness reportedly unrelated to her detention.
President Chávez publicly instructed the Attorney-General andthe President of the Supreme Court to punish Judge Afiuni as severely as possible, to prevent similar actions by other judges.
In relation to the case of Judge María Lourdes Afiuni, mentioned in my two most recent reports on reprisals, information was received indicating that she remains in detention.
The Chairperson of the Working Group mentioned this case during his interactive dialogue with the Human Rights Councilat its sixteenth session, and called on the Government of Venezuela(Bolivarian Republic of) to release Ms. Afiuni immediately.
Regarding the case of Judge Maria Lourdes Afiuni mentioned in my previous report, the Government responded to the urgent appeal sent by several mandate holders on 28 July 2010.
The Committee recommends that the State party investigate and prosecute all cases of arbitrary detention of women and violence against them while in detention,including the case of Judge María Lourdes Afiuni, and compensate victims.
Judge Afiuni was arrested on 10 December 2009 after she ordered the conditional release of an individual whose detention the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention considered arbitrary.
The Government responded by indicating, among other things,that Judge Afiuni had disregarded a decision of the Constitutional Court, and that the alleged attempts to kill her had not in fact taken place.
Judge Afiuni was arrested by the Intelligence and Prevention Services and accused of crimes of corruption, abuse of power, criminal conspiracy and being an accessory to an escape.
In September 2010, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued Opinion No. 20/2010 concerning Judge María Lourdes Afiuni Mora, who, in December 2009, had ordered the release on bail of a detainee who was the subject of another Opinion of the Working Group.
Judge Afiuni was arrested on 10 December 2009 after she ordered the conditional release of an individual whose detention the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention considered arbitrary.
On 14 February 2013,five United Nations special procedures mandate holders issued a public statement in which they urged the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to free Judge Afiuni, and called for investigations into her most recent allegations.
According to information received, Judge Afiuni was promptly arrested by intelligence police officers after having ordered the conditional release pending trial of Eligio Cedeño on 10 December 2009.
On 16 December 2009, the Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges andlawyers sent a joint urgent appeal to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela regarding Judge Afiuni.
According to information received, Judge María Lourdes Afiuni was promptly arrested on 10 December 2009 by police intelligence officers after having ordered the conditional release pending trial of Mr. Cedeño.
It is further alleged that in an appearance before Government officials,which was broadcast on national television and radio, the President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela further demanded that Judge Afiuni be sentenced to a 30-year prison term, even if new legislation was required to achieve that result.
Mr. Cedeño's counsel team had submitted to Judge Afiuni during the trial the Working Group's Opinion No. 10/2009(Venezuela) on Cedeño, which declared his detention to be arbitrary A/HRC/13/30/Add.1, p. 325.
On 16 December 2009, the Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges andlawyers sent a joint urgent appeal to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela regarding Judge María Lourdes Afiuni.
According to the Government,"Ms. Afiuni disobeyed the sentence of the Supreme Court, which confirmed the judgement of the banker in detention and also incurred in a serious omission of the legal proceeding in order to facilitate the escape of the banker.
She could not end her statement without an express appeal for the immediate release of Venezuelan judge María Lourdes Afiuni Mora, who had been incarcerated since December 2009 for having applied the recommendation of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention by ordering the provisional release on bail of a fellow Venezuelan.
They noted that Judge Afiuni had been in detention for more than three years, despite the fact that article 230 of the Penal Code established that detention could not exceed the limit of the minimum sentence of the most serious crime of which the person was accused, which would be three years.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights mentioned the case of Ms. Afiuni in her statement at the tenth Biennial Conference of the International Association of Women Judges in Seoul and has subsequently engaged the Government on this particular case.