Примеры использования Also in granting на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that, while completion is now within sight, the implementation of Mozambique's plan by 31 December 2014 is contingent upon assumptions that may not hold.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that while the technical survey and preparation for demining work would take place in 2014, the actual demining work would take place in 2015.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the timeline contained in the request would greatly assist Chile and all States Parties in assessing progress in implementation during the extension period.
Xiii Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the timeline contained in the request would greatly assist Denmark and all States Parties in assessing progress in implementation during the extension period.
Xxviii Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the timeline contained in the request would greatly assist Zimbabwe and all States Parties in assessing progress in implementation during the extension period.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the commitments made in Chad's 2010-2012 work plan would greatly assist Chad and all States Parties in assessing progress in implementation during the extension period.
Xviii Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the timeline contained in the request would greatly assist Guinea-Bissau and all States Parties in assessing progress between now and the requested extended deadline.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that monthly benchmarks for progress contained in the request would greatly assist Niger and all States Parties in assessing progress made in implementation during the extension period.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the commitments made by the Republic of the Congo in its request would greatly assist the Republic of the Congo and all States Parties in assessing progress in implementation during the extension period.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the provision of annual milestones of progress to be achieved, which Algeria included in its request, would greatly assist both Algeria and all States Parties in assessing progress during the extension period.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that, with speedy establishment of a national mine action authority(NMAA) and national mine action centre(NMAC), Turkey may find itself in a situation wherein it could complete implementation before 1 March 2022.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that both the DRC and all States Parties could benefit if the DRC provided updates on all commitments made in its extension request at meetings of the Standing Committees and at Meetings of the States Parties.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted, that given the importance of external support to ensure timely implementation, the DRC could benefit from enhancing its resource mobilisation strategy, in part by providing clarity regarding estimated costs for implementation.
Vi Also in granting the request, the Conference noted that, while total projected resource requirements are realistic based upon recent experience, Cambodia has projected that an additional US$ 125 million would be required to actually complete implementation of article 5 during the extension period.
Xvii Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the plan presented by Guinea-Bissau provides for the use of the full range of technical and non-technical means to release suspected hazardous areas in keeping with the recommendations adopted by the Ninth Meeting of the States Parties.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that, by requesting a five-year extension, Angola was projecting that it would need approximately five years from the date of submission of its request to obtain clarity regarding the remaining challenge, produce a detailed plan and submit a second extension request.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting,in recalling that the number of efforts to be carried out during the period 2013-2014 are crucial to the success of the implementation of Turkey's plan to implement article 5 during the extension period, requested that Turkey report to the Third Review Conference on the following.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting expressed concern that the Republic of the Congo had not acted in accordance with the agreed"process for the preparation, submission and consideration of requests for extensions to Article 5 deadlines", which was established at the Seventh Meeting of the States Parties.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting requested that Afghanistan provide updates at meetings of the Standing Committees, Meetings of the States Parties, and Review Conferences with respect to a variety of commitments made and milestones contained in its extension request, including with respect to the following.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the plan submitted by Turkey is subject to timeliness of tendering and contracting processes, the establishment of the NMAA and the NMAC, and the timely receipt of funding from the European Union, and therefore the plan may be subject to considerable change.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that, while steps have been taken to clarify the remaining challenge and while a national mine action strategy has been prepared, a detailed annual work plan for survey and clearance leading to completion and based on accurate and coherent data was still missing.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that both Eritrea and all States Parties could benefit if Eritrea provided updates on progress made in obtaining clarity regarding the remaining challenge and in producing a detailed plan at meetings of the Standing Committees and at Meetings of the States Parties.
Viii Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that, after almost ten years since entry into force, Colombia does not have the information in place to report in a more precise manner on the location of areas known or suspected to contain anti-personnel mines and hence to develop an implementation plan based on concrete information.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that the request does not contain benchmarks for progress which would assist Mozambique and all States Parties in assessing progress in implementation during the extension period, which will be especially important given that assumptions central to the plan may not hold.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted, as Eritrea has made it clear that external support based on equal partnership is necessary for implementation, the importance of Eritrea developing as soon as possible resource mobilisation strategies that take into account the need to reach out to a wide range of national and international funding sources.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting,in noting that Chad indicated that the mine action strategy will be subject to a mid-term evaluation in 2015, requested Chad to inform the States Parties, by the end of 2015, of the results of its mid-term evaluation of the strategy, including if necessary, providing an updated strategy that takes into account new information.
Iv Also in granting the request, the Meeting noted that while it may be unfortunate that after almost twelve years since entry into force a State Party is unable to specify how much work remains and how it will be carried out, it is positive that Chad intends to renew efforts to garner an understanding of the true remaining extent of the challenge and develop plans accordingly.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting requested that Zimbabwe provide updates at the meetings of the Standing Committees in 2013 and at the Thirteenth Meeting of the States Parties with respect to a variety of commitments made and milestones contained in its extension request, and observations contained in the analysis on the request, including with respect to the following.
Also in granting the request, the Conference noted that as Tajikistan projects that it will require slightly more funds on an annual basis than it has received in recent years, Tajikistan could benefit from increasing its frequency of contact with donors and clearly communicating the socio-economic development benefits that would flow from completing article 5 implementation.
Ix Also in granting the request, the Conference noted that both Tajikistan and all States Parties would benefit if Tajikistan's national demining plan incorporated its intentions as concerns mined areas it has reported along the Tajik-Uzbek border, including by providing additional clarity on the location and status of areas suspected to contain mines along the Tajik-Uzbek border.