Примеры использования Articles should apply на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In the opinion of the United Kingdom, these articles should apply to all such activities.
The draft articles should apply to all treaties between States where at least one of which is a party to an armed conflict;
In the Sixth Committee several delegations expressed the view that the draft articles should apply to articles which were being provisionally applied. .
In that context, it was noted that the draft articles should apply to all treaties between States when at least one of the parties was engaged in an armed conflict and that the consideration of treaties involving international intergovernmental organizations should be left until later.
Concerns also existed regarding the rights of persons who had been expelled; in his delegation's opinion,the draft articles should apply to individuals within the territory of a State and subject to its jurisdiction.
The rules framed in the draft articles should apply only to relations between States parties to the armed conflict, whereas with regard to relations with third States not involved in the conflict the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties concerning suspension and termination were sufficient.
Generally speaking, and in conformity with the framework adopted in international human rights treaties,the draft articles should apply to individuals within the territory of a State who were subject to a State's jurisdiction.
However, should the view prevail that the draft articles should apply also to treaties between a State engaged in an armed conflict and a third State, it would be justified to also endow the third State with the right to suspend, for example, a treaty that is in conflict with its duties under the laws of neutrality.
Therefore, it has doubts as to the recommendation of the Working Group on the Effects of Armed Conflicts on Treaties that the draft articles should apply to all treaties between States where at least one of the States is a party to an armed conflict.
Concerning article 1, his delegation felt that the articles should apply also to the use of confined groundwaters inasmuch as they constituted part of a unitary whole and that the definition of an international watercourse contained in article 2 should be maintained, especially the expression"flowing into a common terminus", for the removal of that expression would render the application of the articles difficult.
As regards the inclusion of non-international armed conflict,it was maintained that the draft articles should apply to any armed conflict, international or non-international, regardless of whether war had been declared.
With regard to the question whether the draft articles should cover solely treaties in force at the time of the armed conflict or also treaties that had not yet entered into force, since article 25 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties allowed for the provisional application of treaties, it would seem advisable that the draft articles should apply to treaties that were being provisionally applied. .
A further issue was whether the draft articles should apply to treaties involving international organizations.
Two issues discussed in the Article 2 consultations are primarily concerned with scope of application, i.e. the proposal on exclusion of anti-ship munitions and the previous paragraph 1(d)which specifies which operative Articles should apply to munitions excluded from the definition of cluster munitions under former 1(c) v.
The view was expressed that these draft articles should apply only to certification authorities issuing identity certificates.
Her delegation agreed with the Special Rapporteur that there was a need to reconcile the right of a State to expel aliens with the relevant rules of international law, including those relating to the protection of human rights and to the minimum standards for the treatment of aliens;that the draft articles should apply only to natural persons; and that denial of admission should be excluded since an alien who had not been admitted could not be expelled.
His delegation endorsed the concept that the draft articles should apply only to activities which involved the risk of causing significant transboundary damage.
With regard to the question whether the draft articles should cover solely treaties in force at the time of the armed conflict or also treaties that had not yet entered into force, the view was expressed that, since article 25 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties allowed for the provisional application of treaties, it seemed advisable that the draft articles should apply to treaties that were being provisionally applied. .
Several Governments expressed the view that the draft articles should apply also to treaties or parts of treaties which are being provisionally applied. .
Some delegations concurred with the Special Rapporteur's suggestion to delete the expression"not prohibited by international law" from draft article 1 on the basis that the draft articles should apply to any activity involving risk, irrespective of whether it was contrary to any other rule of international law.
Several members considered that the draft articles should apply to aliens physically present in the territory of the expelling State, whether legally or illegally.
During the consideration of the draft articles on the law of treaties from 1950 to 1966, the Commission discussed on several occasions the question of whether the draft articles should apply not only to treaties between States but also to treaties concluded by other entities, and in particular by international organizations.
In assessing whether article 27 of the draft articles should apply to cases where one State induces another to breach a treaty with a third State, reference is sometimes made to general principles of law, e.g., to the effect that it is a wrong to interfere with the legal right of another, including a contractual right. See, e.g., H. Lauterpacht,“Contracts to Break a Contract”(1936), in E. Lauterpacht(ed.), International Law, being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol. 4(1978) p. 340, at p. 374.
On the topic of the effects of armed conflict on treaties,his delegation agreed with the Working Group of the Commission that the draft articles should apply to all treaties between States at least one of which was a party to an armed conflict; that should be clearly indicated in draft article 1 on scope.
In keeping with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, however, the draft articles should apply only to situations of international armed conflict and not to internal armed conflicts, which were often triggered by separatist rebels and had no bearing on treaties concluded freely between two sovereign States.
Concerning chapter V(International liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law), he supported the principle embodied in draft article 1, subparagraph(b), namely,that the draft articles should apply to activities not prohibited by international law which, de facto, caused significant transboundary harm, even when they did not involve a risk at the time that they were carried out.
In accordance with international human rights treaties,the draft articles should apply to individuals within the territory of a State who were subject to a State's jurisdiction.
With regard to article 13,the observer for Australia indicated that many delegations agreed that this article should apply only to particular visits in the context of a mission to a country.
In investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to an offence established in article(s)[…][alternatively: to an offence covered by this Convention]One delegation was of the view that this article should apply only to offences established by the Convention.
It did not, however,share the view that the draft articles should also apply to non-international armed conflicts.