Примеры использования Author explains на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author explains what one should expect from robots in the future.
As he was unable to visit Simon, it is logical, the author explains, that the visit did not officially take place.
The author explains that she wishes also to invoke article 12 of the Convention.
Regarding the political persecution of her family, the author explains that the persecution only began in April 2005 with the arrest of her uncle.
The author explains that he did not confess to the murder despite the torture.
Люди также переводят
Some dared say that Jesus Christ is the angel, therefore,in the Epistle to the Hebrews the author explains the difference between angels, Jesus Christ, and people.
The author explains that, for the past five years, he suffers from"bumps" on his skin.
In the last part"Théocratie", the author explains the relationship of the three monotheistic religions with political power.
The author explains that her son was kept isolated and could not meet with his relatives.
As to the facts of the claim, the author explains that in January 1949 his father was ordered out of his business, which was confiscated.
The author explains that he was never informed of the many judicial remedies available to him.
In his comments on the State party's observations, the author explains why, in his opinion, his communication meets the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
The author explains that during his detention from 1999 until 2007, he was mostly kept in isolation.
See that suggestive work, The Source of Measures, where the author explains the real meaning of the word Sacr', from which"sacred,""sacrament," are derived, words which have now become synonyms of holiness, though purely phallic!
As the author explains, each work from this series means one theme: religion, nature, a work of art and a human.
With regard to admissibility, the author explains that the claim which he has lodged with the Committee differs from the case heard by the European Court.
The author explains that all the summonses received by Abdelkader Benaziza, son of the victim, were written summonses.
By letter of 21 September 2010, the author explains that no measures have been taken so far by the State party's authorities to implement the Committee's Views.
The author explains that following the constitutional abolition of capital punishment in 1987, the Congress in 1994 reintroduced the death penalty by electrocution through the Republic Act 7659.
To support her allegation, the author explains that the Supreme Court Chief Justice Elias was a member of the Court of Appeal upon overturning of her sentence on 2 March 1999.
The author explains this discrepancy reason of chosen estimation procedure in summary and their structural components in particular.
As regards the delay between trial and appeal, the author explains that it is the delay of 51 months itself which is in violation of article 14, and that the fact that he had his case reviewed by the Privy Council is irrelevant to his claim.
The author explains that wearing a turban is a religious obligation and an integral part of Sikhism, his religion.
The author explains that he was not the organizer of a meeting held near the Central Universal Store in Brest on 10 December 2000.
The author explains that on 7 September 2004, he complained about the DEC Secretary's actions to the Prosecutor of the Soviet District of Gomel.
The author explains that he did not bring this issue up during the appeal as he was afraid to be found in contempt of court.
The author explains that his attorney felt that there were no effective remedies and that was why they did not pursue their appeals.
The author explains that his family and given names were included in the 2006 parliamentary report, contrary to the State party's assertion.
The author explains that their property was a family house in Hosov, now Jihlava district, with a garage, separate buildings, and an 861 sq.m. garden.
The author explains that by taking him away from the commemoration, the State party's authorities deprived him of the right to peaceful assembly.