Примеры использования Believes that the conference on disarmament на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Colombia believes that the Conference on Disarmament must try and free itself from the procedural straitjacket which is rendering its operation so difficult.
Russia is prepared to pursue dialogue with all interested States on enhancing the non-proliferation regime andon further disarmament measures, and believes that the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva is the most acceptable venue for conducting such work.
Turkey believes that the Conference on Disarmament must retain its role as the single multilateral negotiating forum in the field of disarmament. .
Cuba is prepared to launch immediate negotiations on a multilateral convention which applies this approach and believes that the Conference on Disarmament, as the sole multilateral negotiating forum in the area of disarmament, is the proper framework for such an undertaking.
My country believes that the Conference on Disarmament is the most suitable body for discussing disarmament problems in all their aspects and for conducting negotiations.
Cuba is prepared to initiate negotiations immediately on a multilateral convention which would apply this concept and believes that the Conference on Disarmament, as the only multilateral negotiating forum in the area of disarmament, is the appropriate framework for carrying them out.
Algeria believes that the Conference on Disarmament, in its capacity as the only multilateral negotiating forum in the field of disarmament, could make a great contribution in this area.
Nigeria believes that the Conference on Disarmament is uniquely placed to discuss such a programme of nuclear disarmament in the context of an ad hoc committee on nuclear disarmament which should be established early this year.
While this matter has since 1995 primarily been addressed within the framework of the NPT,Egypt believes that the Conference on Disarmament, with its central role in international efforts related to nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, is nonetheless an appropriate forum for us to underscore our concerns and the importance we attach to the creation in the Middle East of a zone free of nuclear weapons.
China believes that the Conference on Disarmament should re-establish an ad hoc committee on the prevention of an arms race in outer space at an early date so that substantive work can be conducted on the issue of the prevention of the weaponization of outer space.
As one of the 2008 Presidents of the Conference, Turkey believes that the Conference on Disarmament has a major role to play on nuclear issues, a fissile material cut-off treaty, parallel advances on negative security assurances and the prevention of an arms race in outer space.
Cuba also believes that the Conference on Disarmament should play the principal role in negotiating a multilateral agreement on the prevention of an arms race in outer space in all its aspects.
At the same time, Cuba believes that the Conference on Disarmament should play the central role in negotiating a multilateral agreement on the prevention of an arms race in outer space in any form.
At the same time, Cuba believes that the Conference on Disarmament must play the principal role in negotiating a multilateral agreement on the prevention of an arms race in outer space in all its aspects.
Finland also believes that the Conference on Disarmament should continue to address the issue with a particular focus on transfers of anti-personnel landmines to complement and support the Ottawa Convention.
At the same time, Cuba believes that the Conference on Disarmament must play the lead role in the negotiation of a multilateral agreement on the prevention of an arms race in outer space in all its aspects.
Cuba believes that the Conference on Disarmament, as the sole multilateral disarmament negotiating forum, has the primary role in the negotiation of a multilateral agreement on the prevention of an arms race in outer space in all its aspects.
Pakistan believes that the Conference on Disarmament(CD) provides the best forum to address the threat posed by proliferation of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their means of delivery, where the member states could participate in negotiations in a non-discriminatory manner.
China believes that the Conference on Disarmament, as the sole multilateral disarmament negotiating forum, should take concrete action in this regard, re-establishing an ad hoc committee to negotiate an international legal instrument preventing an arms race in outer space.
At the same time, the European Union believes that the Conference on Disarmament must continue to address the issue of transparency in armaments, which could also contribute to a Conference on Disarmament agenda with a better balance between issues relating to conventional weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
In this context, Egypt still believes that the Conference on Disarmament is the sole multilateral disarmament negotiating forum, and in that context welcomes the collective action of Member States aimed at revitalizing the work of the Conference as long as such efforts target neither its rules of procedure nor its priorities.
My delegation believes that the Conference on Disarmament, as a subsidiary body of the General Assembly, should respect the wishes of all prospective new members and therefore shares the opinion already expressed by many States members of the Conference that further expansion of its membership will serve only to add to its wealth of experience and expertise and will in no way negatively affect its programme of work.
We believe that the Conference on Disarmament can effectively contribute to that subject.
We believe that the Conference on Disarmament is the appropriate forum for negotiating an FMCT.
We believe that the Conference on Disarmament is capable of supporting these negotiations simultaneously.
I believe that the Conference on Disarmament cannot escape dealing with these issues, which life itself puts before us, and that it will with time find the proper answers to them.
We therefore believe that the Conference on Disarmament needs to open its door to those countries that have both the will and the capacity to contribute to multilateral disarmament. .
I believe that the Conference on Disarmament will be unable to avoid dealing with these questions, which are raised by life itself, and in time will find the appropriate responses.
We believe that the Conference on Disarmament is the appropriate body to negotiate a multilateral, non-discriminatory and internationally and effectively verifiable treaty on fissile material produced for military purposes.