Примеры использования Consumption of those substances на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Party had not been granted an essential use authorization for the consumption of those substances in 2006.
Consumption of those substances listed in Schedule II of the 1971 Convention has been discontinued or considerably reduced in all countries.
The plan of action contained a commitment by the Party to limit its consumption of those substances and reaffirmed the Party's commitment, contained in decision XV/36, to establish a licensing and quota system.
Noting with concern that Bangladesh has reported consumption of 154.9 ODP-tonnes CFCs in 2007,which is 67.7 ODP-tonnes in excess of the Protocol's requirement to limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 87.2 ODP-tonnes.
Most parties had recorded zero consumption of those substances, and significant compliance was likely for the 2010 target date for total phase-out of CFCs, halons and carbon tetrachloride.
Noting also that Bosnia and Herzegovina's reported CFC consumption for 2007 and2008 is in excess of the Protocol's requirement to limit consumption of those substances to no greater than 3.6 ODPtonnes in 2007 and 2008.
The Board follows closely developments in the consumption of those substances to identify consumption levels that may be inappropriate for medical purposes and might be indicative of activities not in line with the provisions of the Convention.
Evaluation of trends in the concentration in the atmosphere of ozone-depleting substances andtheir consistency with reported production and consumption of those substances and the likely implications for the state of the ozone layer and the atmosphere;
The Board has closely followed developments in the consumption of those substances, with a view to identifying consumption levels that may be inappropriate for medical purposes and might therefore lead to the diversion and abuse of the substances in question.
Noting with appreciation Turkmenistan's explanation for its reported consumption of 0.3 ODPtonnes of carbon tetrachloride in 2008, in excess of the Protocol's requirement to limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than zero ODP-tonnes.
Specifically, the proposal calls for parties not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 to reduce their production and consumption of those substances by 15 per cent of their average 2004- 2006 levels of production and consumption of HCFCs and HFCs in the 12-month period beginning on 1 January 2013.
Noting that Saudi Arabia reported consumption of 657.8 ODP-tonnes of the Annex A, group I, controlled substances(CFCs) in 2007, an amount inconsistent with the Protocol's requirement that the Party limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 269.8 ODP-tonnes;
Specifically, the proposal calls for parties not operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5 to reduce their production and consumption of those substances by 15 per cent of their average 2004- 2006 levels of production and consumption of HCFCs and HFCs in the 12 month period commencing on 1 January 2013.
Noting that Vanuatu reported consumption of the controlled substances in Annex A, group I(CFCs), for 2007 of 0.3 ODP-tonnes andfor 2008 of 0.7 ODP-tonnes, an amount inconsistent with the Protocol's requirement that the party limit its consumption of those substances in those years to no greater than zero ODP-tonnes;
According to those calculations, China's consumption in 2004 of those substances would be reported as 20.5 ODPtonnes andits maximum allowable consumption of those substances in that year under the Protocol would be reported as 20.6 ODP-tonnes, noting that the latter figure was derived from the Party's baseline rounded to one rather than three decimal places.
Noting with concern that Guatemala had reported consumption of the controlled substances in Annex C, group I(hydrochlorofluorocarbons(HCFCs)), of 11.3 ODP-tonnes for 2013,an amount that represented a deviation from the Protocol's requirement that the party limit consumption of those substances to no greater than 8.3 ODP-tonnes in that year.
Somalia reported consumption of 18.8 ODP-tonnes of halons in 2006,an amount that is inconsistent with the Protocol's requirement that it limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 50 per cent of its baseline for those substances, namely, 8.85 ODP-tonnes.
Noting with concern that the Federated States of Micronesia reported consumption of 0.5 ODPtonnes of chlorofluorocarbons in 2007, in excess of its commitment contained in decision XVII/32 to phase out chlorofluorocarbon consumption by 1 January 2006 andthe Protocol's requirement to limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 0.2 ODP-tonnes.
Paraguay had reported consumption of 250.7 ODP-tonnes of CFCs in 2005,an amount inconsistent with the Protocol's requirement that it limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 50 per cent of its baseline for those substances, namely, 105.280 ODP-tonnes.
Noting with appreciation Saudi Arabia's explanation for its reported consumption of 657.8 ODPtonnes of chlorofluorocarbons in 2007,in excess of the Protocol's requirement to limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 269.8 ODP-tonnes.
Noting with appreciation Eritrea's explanation for its reported consumption of 30.2 ODPtonnes of Annex A, group I, controlled substances(CFCs) in 2005,an amount inconsistent with the Protocol's requirement to limit consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 50 per cent of its baseline level, namely 20.6 ODP-tonnes, in accordance with decision XVIII/24 of the Eighteenth Meeting of the Parties.
To note with concern, however, that Eritrea reported consumption of 30.220 ODP-tonnes of the Annex A, group I,controlled substances(chlorofluorocarbons) in 2005, in excess of the Protocol's requirement to reduce consumption of those substances in that year to no greater than 50 percent of the Party's baseline;
To congratulate Dominica on its return to compliance in 2006 with the control measures of the Montreal Protocol for the Annex A, group I, controlled substances(CFCs) andits implementation of its commitment contained in decision XVIII/22 to reduce consumption of those substances to no greater than 0.45 ODP-tonnes in 2006, as indicated by the Party's data report for 2006.
To congratulate Guatemala on its reported data for the consumption of Annex A, group I, controlled substances(CFCs)in 2006, which showed that it was in advance of its commitment contained in decision XV/34 to reduce consumption of those substances to no greater than 50 ODPtonnes in that year and its CFC phaseout obligations under the Montreal Protocol;
Recalling Paraguay's explanation for its reported consumption of the Annex A, group I, controlled substances(CFCs) of 250.7 ODP-tonnes in 2005,an amount inconsistent with the Protocol's requirement to limit consumption of those substances to no greater than 50 per cent of its baseline for those substances, namely 105.280 ODP-tonnes, in that year.
In response to a request from the Secretariat,the Party had explained that its excess consumption in 2005 of carbon tetrachloride and methyl chloroform was attributable to consumption in the eastern part of the country, where civil unrest had prevented data collection, as a result of which consumption of those substances in that region had not been included in the Party's data reports to the Secretariat for the years 2001- 2004.
At its thirty-fifth meeting, the Committee had been informed that for the year 2004 the United States of Americahad reported consumption and production of CFCs in excess of its requirement under the Protocol to maintain total phaseout in that year of the production and consumption of those substances, except for essential uses agreed by the Parties and allowed by the basic domestic needs provisions of the Protocol.
INCB welcomes this development,which will enable it to analyse more accurately the consumption levels of those substances in the countries and territories concerned.
In France, where a strict prescribing status for anorectics had been introduced already in 1995, consumption levels of those substances considerably decreased in 1996.
Rounding the maximum allowable consumption for given controlled substances in 2005 tothe nearest one or two decimal places using standard rounding techniques would not have allowed greater total global consumption of those controlled substances in that year, but could have had compliance consequences for some Parties;