Примеры использования Counsel concedes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Counsel concedes that the author has not applied to the Supreme(Constitutional) Court of Jamaica for redress.
As regards the claim under article 14, paragraph 3(e), counsel concedes that there are differences between statements from witnesses and those from defendants.
Counsel concedes however that the first company used a Sami as"employee or subcontractor in opening the road line.
Unlike the provisions of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,the Optional Protocol does not contain a res judicata clause; counsel concedes that if the author of a communication were to resubmit, without alteration, a submission previously declared inadmissible or already considered by the Committee, that would amount to an abuse of the right of submission.
Counsel concedes that Mr. Stewart was given an opportunity, before the Immigration Appeal Division, to present all the circumstances of his case.
With regard to the absence of scientific evidence at the trial, counsel concedes that it is open for the defence to comment on the absence of such evidence in order to undermine the prosecution case but that the defence would normally not demand that it be produced.
Counsel concedes that, after the decision of the High Court in December 1992, no further challenge was indeed made to the lawfulness of the author's detention.
In his comments, counsel concedes that Mr. Allen was an adult when the crime was committed.
Counsel concedes that the Canadian refugee claim determination system is good on paper, but argues that even in a good system, mistakes are made.
In the instant case, counsel concedes that"repeated efforts" were made to secure the attendance of Horace Beckford.
Counsel concedes that part of the delay appears to be attributable to the author, who did not succeed in retaining counsel privately and failed to apply again for legal aid after his first trial.
As to the author's trial, counsel concedes that the judge's directions to the jury were in conformity with the applicable law in Barbados.
Counsel concedes that the doctrine of res judicata may apply to the procedure under the Optional Protocol and that the legal basis for such an interpretation may be found in article 3 of the Protocol.
Counsel concedes that the author was given a domestic Protection(Temporary) Entry Permit on 21 January 1994 and released from custody after his wife was granted refugee status because of her Vietnamese ethnic origin.
Counsel concedes that it is too early to gauge the extent of the contamination of the ecosystem, the marine environment and the food chain by radiation, as cancers may take 10 to 30 years to develop and manifest themselves; the same is true for genetic malformations.
Counsel concedes that the reasons for the delay remain unclear despite many attempts by his law firm and the Jamaica Council for Human Rights to contact the author's lawyer for the trial and to ascertain the reasons for the delay.
Counsel concedes that there may be an issue of whether Mr. Ashby had a right, under article 14, paragraph 5, to have his case reviewed by a higher tribunal, where that constitutional review was available to him, and where he was already in the process of pursuing it and relying upon it.
Counsel concedes that the trial judge suggested to the jury that the witness could hardly be relied on, but argues that, nevertheless, the judge should not have allowed the evidence, which was unfavourable to the author, to go before the jury and to be used in their deliberations.
On 10 May 2006, counsel conceded that their client no longer ran any risk of being deported to Tunisia now that he had been granted subsidiary protection.
In respect of the allegation of a violation of article 6, paragraph 5,the Committee observes that the State party has conclusively shown, and counsel conceded, that Mr. Allen was an adult when the crime of which he was convicted was committed.
In a capital case,when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
In a capital case, when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
In a capital case, when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
In a capital case, when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
While it is not for the Committee to question counsel's professional judgement, the Committee considers thatin a capital case, when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the Court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
While it is not for the Committee to question counsel's professional judgement, the Committee considers thatin a capital case, when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the Court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
While it is not for the Committee to question counsel's professional judgment, the Committee considers thatin a capital case, when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the Court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
While it is not for the Committee to question counsel's professional judgment that there was no merit in the appeal against conviction, the Committee considers thatin a capital case, when counsel for the accused concedes that there is no merit in the appeal, the Court should ascertain whether counsel has consulted with the accused and informed him accordingly.
In this context, the Committee notes that counsel herself concedes that the petition for leave to appeal currently pending before the Judicial Committee may make it possible to clarify the law; it further notes that counsel confirmed, by a call of 21 February 1995, that the hearing of the petition could not be expected for another three to four months, and that the arguments on Mr. Guerra's behalf were being prepared.
It was only shortly prior to the commencement of the trial that he was given access to a lawyer, and therefore this lawyer had no time to prepare the defence.This claim submitted by author's counsel does not tally with one of the author's handwritten letters to the Committee, in which he concedes that his lawyer, a Queen's Counsel, represented him well on trial.