Примеры использования Court continued на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Court continued.
Agenda item 154:International Criminal Court continued.
The Court continued.
Demonstrations against the International Criminal Court continued throughout the country.
The Court continued as follows.
Draft report of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court continued.
The Court continued that, as such.
With respect to the situations in the Central African Republic, Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya,Mali and Uganda, the Court continued to benefit from cooperation from United Nations field presences, with.
The Court continued to be seized of four situations during the reporting period.
In cases where the European Court of Human Rights had already issued a judgement on themerits prior to the Demopoulos decision, however, the Court continued examination in 2011 of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.
The Court continued to detain Ukbi, who was not represented by a lawyer, until the end of the month.
Throughout the reporting period, a panel of one local and two EULEX judges at the Pristina District Court continued the main trial against six defendants accused of aggravated murder and attempted aggravated murder in the so-called Bllaca 2 case.
The Court continued to detain the defendants, who were not represented by a lawyer, for another 10 days.
During the reporting period, the Court continued to be seized of the four situations already opened over the preceding period.
The Court continued its investigations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda and Darfur, the Sudan.
JS8 reported that the Specialized Criminal Court continued to hold trials despite the lack of constitutionality of this institution.
The Court continued to be a major asset where the principal organs had different interpretations with regard to their respective Charter mandates.
During the reporting period, the Court continued to receive crucial support and cooperation from the senior leadership of the United Nations.
The Court continued to work towards developing understanding and awareness of its role and activities in relation to both proceedings and investigations.
During the reporting period, the International Criminal Court continued to provide detention services and other related assistance to the SpecialCourt for Sierra Leone in its trial of Charles Taylor in The Hague.
The Court continued to gather evidence and took steps to ensure that a statement could be taken from Mr. G.A.P.G. in the United States.
The Working Group considered several proposals to revise paragraph 123C to clarify that the court continued to have an obligation to determine independently the location of the debtor's centre of main interests irrespective of whether or not there was a challenge to it being located at the place of registration.
The court continued and held that, as a general rule,"any challenge to the arbitrator's jurisdiction must be resolved first by the arbitrator" in accordance with the competence-competence principle.
From the start of the reporting period until 12 May 2010, the Court continued to provide courtroom services and facilities, detention services and facilities and other related assistance to the Special Court for Sierra Leone in its trial of Charles Taylor in The Hague.
The Court continued to engage with State representatives in New York in the context of ongoing discussions to increase and strengthen the relationship between the Court and the Security Council, including through informal meetings between the Prosecutor and Council members.
The trial records indicate that the court continued proceedings after the failure of Mr. Gashin to appear in court, with agreement of both the Prosecutor and the accused.
The Court continued to participate in the United Nations security management system and relied on United Nations missions for the provision of services including transportation, audiovisual communication, medical assistance, security briefings and security training, information-sharing and risk-management resources.
In that regard, the Court continued to undertake rigorous budget management in order to achieve savings.
In principle, the Court continued, it is not altogether impossible that the national law of the responsible State may grant the victim a personal claim parallel to the injured State's claim under international law.
The Federal Constitutional Court continued that regarding the facts of the present case the case law on the subject is far from uniform.