Примеры использования Decentralization can на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Even partial decentralization can result in some benefits for local people.
Given that the poorest communities have the least capacity to participate, decentralization can in fact exacerbate inequality.
Decentralization can be key in promoting effective public services, equity and accountability.
And there is some evidence that decentralization can strengthen stewardship, such as in Kenya and Uganda.
Decentralization can result in a lack of clarity about responsibilities and extra competition for scarce resources.
In the absence of those conditions, decentralization can lead to rent seeking and capture by local elites.
Decentralization can end up decentralizing corruption by fragmenting centrally organized mechanisms for rent-seeking.
In cases of homogeneous programme outputs, decentralization can be achieved either from the top-down or through local NGO efforts.
Decentralization can also result in a plethora of conflicts at the local level as new responsibilities and opportunities arise with the devolving of new powers to the community.
But one principle has proved to be applicable everywhere: decentralization can greatly enhance the efficient and effective use of human, social and economic resources.
Decentralization can produce sustainable environmental benefits under the right circumstances, but it can also lead to significant environmental problems;
However, failure to take note of the specific characteristics and historical stage of a particular country ora region within a country while working on devolution and decentralization can upset national consensus in a new or restored democracy.
Capacity-building combined with decentralization can considerably enhance transparency and face-to-face accountability.
Real decentralization can be measured along local government's powers in generating independent revenues such as local taxes, service fees, and charges;
Several valuable lessons were learned to achieve true decentralization: it was necessary to enhance lower-level support;a clear division of labour was needed for tasks to be carried out at the various levels; decentralization can strengthen national integration since it promotes the perception that the State belongs to the people; and the success criteria for decentralization may be measured by the degree of efficiency and effectiveness in the delivery of government services.
Decentralization can be conducive to greater participation and accountability but is not necessarily conducive to equitable distribution of resources across regions and population groups.
Furthermore, fiscal decentralization can strengthen local governance and create local ownership for the disposition of funds.
Decentralization can further these objectives by bringing services closer to their beneficiaries, thereby ensuring fast, cost-effective and knowledgeable responses to problems.
Experience in Venezuela also shows that decentralization can strengthen national integration since it promotes a perception that the State belongs to the people, and is responsive to their demands and interests.
The transition to decentralization can be supported through the existence of national and sub-national forest policies, transparency, the presence of stable, democratic institutions, and broad-based agreements through transparent, stable and coherent committees or stakeholder processes.
Convinced that effective decentralization can contribute to strengthening gender equality, promoting women's empowerment in human settlements, and providing new opportunities for employment for young people and social inclusion.
Experience suggests that, while decentralization can enable local authorities to deal more efficiently with the impact of globalization trends at the local level, subsidiarity has the potential to usher in a new form of partnership among national, provincial and local governments.
In that context, decentralization could play a major role in ensuring good governance.
Decentralization could provide a boost to cooperation, but initiatives at the country level are required to operationalize the good intentions.
Decentralization could increase the impact of technical cooperation, and the Group supported increased decentralization of authority to the field offices.
It was emphasized that decentralization could only be effective within the context of a sound and functioning legal regime.
Moreover, excessive decentralization could have a negative effect on discipline among peace-keeping personnel, and the lack of discipline often led to illegal and criminal activity.
The Committee was concerned that without therequisite resource capacities and gender sensitivity of officials, such decentralization could deny women access to those services in contravention of the Convention.
Decentralization could be implemented gradually and by sub-national region, permitting the development of a learning process and new capacities.
While such a decentralization could be cost-effective in large peacekeeping missions, it is unlikely that this would be the case for smaller missions or offices away from Headquarters.