Примеры использования Double punishment на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
To clean from laws double punishments- only one.
In other words, the categories of persons in question cannot suffer double punishment.
The determination of double punishment is generally left to the discretion of the relevant authority.
To accept that expelling persons after they have served a prison sentence is a double punishment;
The author maintains that the DPSOA imposes double punishment without further determination of criminal guilt.
Mr. Wang Xuexian saidthat compelling a detainee to bear part of the cost of his or her imprisonment was a double punishment.
As a result, they are subjected to double punishment, which may lead, in many cases, to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
Given the nature of their detention, they were denied complicated dental or other treatment,which the witness described as a double punishment.
The conditions suffered by migrants in Italian prisons constituted a form of double punishment, which was incompatible with national and international principles.
The imposition of the author's continuing detention order after having served his original sentence constitutes a breach of the prohibition of double punishment.
The ministry sees in this a risk of double punishment and indicated this as a reason why it was decided to establish liability of legal persons in very few cases.
Mr. Ramdane(Mauritania) said that human trafficking had been a crime in his country since 2003 and carried a double punishment of imprisonment and a fine.
The absence of any further determination of guilt amounts to double punishment and also undermines the essence of the principle that deprivation of liberty must not be arbitrary.
The author claims to be a victim of a violation of article 14,paragraph 7 of the Covenant because his imprisonment based on the CSSOA imposes double punishment without further determination of criminal guilt.
In general, it appears that the principle of double punishment, namely a prison sentence coupled with a judicial or administrative expulsion decision, is allowed in the countries studied, except in Belgium.
With regard to article 14, paragraph 7,the State party argues that the author has failed to exhaust domestic remedies as he has never raised the prospect of double punishment before any domestic tribunal.
The author submits that the double punishment effect of the CSSOA is reinforced by the fact that the Supreme Court is required to have regard to the prior offences of a person in determining whether a continuing detention order is issued.
However, since the appeal was directed against the administrative expulsion decision and not the judicial expulsion decision, the Court did not rule on theterm of the expulsion, which amounted to double punishment.
He maintains that his imprisonment under the DPSOA amounted to a double punishment considering that the court is required to have regard to the prior offences determining whether a continued imprisonment should be ordered.
According to the author, in Fardon, the High Court of Australia confirmed the validity of the Queensland act and dismissed an appeal brought on a number of grounds,including that the Queensland act authorized double punishment.
The author submits that the denial of his right to be free from double punishment amounts to a breach of articles 2, paragraph 1, and 26 of the Covenant in that he was unreasonably discriminated against based on his nationality.
Since the whore of Babylon, the great city, did not just sin against itself and God, blaspheming Him and His Lamb, but also seduced and filled untold numbers of ignorant and naïve people with her antichristian hatred,the seductress had to bear a double punishment: both her own, and that of those she seduced(Revelation 18:6).
The State party thus submits that the author's continuing detention did not constitute double punishment within the meaning of article 14, paragraph 7, because it did not relate to the same offence and his further detention did not have a punitive character.
The source also considers that there has been a violation of the principle of equality of nationals and foreigners before the law,given that a double penalty has been imposed against the two foreigners-- the criminal conviction and the administrative deportation measure-- which constitutes double punishment and discrimination against foreigners.
Risk of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; arbitrary detention; double punishment; arbitrary or unlawful interference in private and family life; prohibition of discrimination.
The issue of double punishment did not arise: although there was limited possibility of appealing the decision to hold a non-jury trial because that trial format was called for by the most senior prosecutor, all judgements were appealable, irrespective of the format of the trial.
However, German law spells out the offences that must give rise to expulsion, while the laws of Italy andPortugal prohibit double punishment for aliens belonging to protected categories, who may be expelled only if they constitute a threat to public order.
It might nevertheless be wondered whether, by adding this"double punishment", the legislation does not violate several principles of international law, such as non-discrimination on grounds of origin or nationality or the principle of equality, including equality before criminal law, that is enshrined in both domestic and international law.
Unless the State party is arguing that the relevant provision of the Act is invalid or should be read down to give it a more restrictive meaning,there is no basis for arguing that any common law doctrine concerning double punishment would overcome, or give rise to a domestic remedy in respect of the Minister's power under section 501 of the Act.
Regarding the State party's contention on non-exhaustion of domestic remedies related to his claim under article 14, paragraph 7,the author is unaware of any Australian jurisprudence that supports the suggestion that the author could be afforded an effective remedy occasioned by the rule of common law which protects individuals against double punishment.