Примеры использования Draft articles on prevention на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The former consideration is already addressed by the draft articles on prevention.
Significant harm" same threshold as in the draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm paragraph 174, subparagraph(c)(4) above.
Indeed, this is well understood throughout the work on draft articles on prevention.
For instance, in the commentary to the draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm from hazardous activities, 2001, the Commission stated that.
State affected" is not defined by the draft articles on prevention.
The draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm from hazardous activities served as a useful guide for States on how to prevent transboundary damage.
Relationship between draft principles and the draft articles on prevention.
While the draft articles on prevention had addressed the first objective and, partially, the second objective, the challenge for the Commission was to address the remaining elements of the policy.
It links the present draft principles to the draft articles on prevention.
In 1996, before the draft articles on prevention were adopted, the Working Group of the Commission recognized that the outcome would embrace activities with a continuing operation and effect.
The term"territory","jurisdiction", or"control" is understood in the same way as in the draft articles on prevention.
The present draft principles, like the draft articles on prevention, are concerned with primary rules.
There was broad support for maintaining the same threshold of"significant harm" as in the draft articles on prevention.
The United States strongly supported retaining the draft articles on prevention and the draft principles on allocation of loss in their current form.
For example, it would be desirable to apply the same threshold of"significant harm" as in the draft articles on prevention.
The draft principles, like the draft articles on prevention, did not apply to transboundary harm caused by State policies in monetary, socio-economic or similar fields.
This definition follows closely article 2 of the draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm.
Although the importance of addressing issues relating to the global commons was asserted,it was also recognized that the matter was not dealt with in the draft articles on prevention.
It was further noted that the same threshold of"significant harm" as defined in the draft articles on prevention should be maintained for triggering liability.
However, the activities coming within the scope of the present draft principles are already the subject of the requirement of prior authorization under the draft articles on prevention.
In similar vein, it was suggested that the draft articles on prevention should be adopted together with the draft principles in a single General Assembly resolution or separate but coordinated resolutions.
It was recalled that it would be logical for the General Assembly to revert to the question of adopting draft articles on prevention.
In that regard, some delegations stated that the same threshold of"significant harm" as defined in the draft articles on prevention should be maintained for the liability aspects.
To refer to"harm" is consistent with the phase of prevention, andis employed with the same meaning as in the draft articles on prevention.
In that regard, the Commission had been wise to rely on its own recent work on the draft articles on prevention of transboundary harm.
However, the activities coming within the scope of the present principles are the same as those that are subject to the requirement of prior authorization under the draft articles on prevention.
Still others recalled that the Commission had included a provision on equal access in its draft articles on Prevention of transboundary harm art. 15.
Concerning the threshold of liability there was broad support for maintaining the same threshold of"significant harm" as in the draft articles on prevention.
Ms. Hallum(New Zealand) said her delegation noted with satisfaction that the Commission had adopted on first reading 17 draft articles on prevention of transboundary damage from hazardous activities.
The focus of the present draft principles is on damage caused,irrespective of the fulfilment of duties of due diligence as set out in the draft articles on prevention.