Примеры использования Evaluation covered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The evaluation covered the completeness and timeliness of reporting.
Concerning the thematic evaluation of UNFPA support to maternal health,he clarified that the evaluation covered a 10-year period, 2000-2010, with the report being written in 2011.
The evaluation covered the completeness and timeliness of reporting.
In April 2016 a thematic evaluation of UNFPA's Support to Family Planning 2008-2013 was completed.69 The evaluation covered all countries where UNFPA works in family planning, but with a particular focus on the 69 priority countries with low rates of contraception use and high unmet need for family planning identified by the London Summit on Family Planning in 2012.
The evaluation covered the completeness and timeliness of reporting, but not its quality.
More specifically, the evaluation covered UNDP efforts to directly contribute to both development and corporate results.
The evaluation covered both the completeness and the timeliness of reporting, but not its quality.
The evaluation covered the completeness and timeliness of reporting, but not its quality.
The evaluation covered the completeness and timeliness of reporting, but not its quality.
The evaluation covered a period of five years from 2006, the date of inception of the Fund, to 2010.
The evaluation covered the period 1999 through 2004, but the report takes into account many critical developments in the HIV/AIDS response in 2005.
The evaluation covered a number of major development policy issues relevant to the IDDA-2 programme in general and to industrial development in particular.
The evaluation covered the current programme period 2008-2013, guided by the Regional Programme Document and its results and resources framework.
The evaluation covered different subregions: Albania and Serbia in South-Eastern Europe; Moldova, Romania and Ukraine in Central and Eastern Europe; Tajikistan and Uzbekistan in Central Asia; and Turkey.
The evaluation covered the period that began in 1999, with the introduction of a strategic results framework(SRF), and included an overview of budgeted activities that were either ongoing or had not yet begun.
The evaluation covered the recovery and early development phases of the response from 2005 to 2008, with a dedicated focus on child protection; basic education; health and nutrition; and water, sanitation and hygiene WASH.
The evaluation covered all programmatic and operational aspects of the third global cooperation framework, with the exception of the'strategic reserve', which receives a financial allocation through the global programme and does not constitute an integral component of the programmatic and operational framework.
The in-depth evaluation covered activities implemented by the Division(subsequently, Office) for Economic and Social Council Support and Coordination, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the General Assembly and Economic and Social Council Affairs Division, Department for General Assembly and Conference Management.
The evaluation covered the period 2000-2005 and involved:(a) intensive case studies in six countries, all of which were, or still are, under Security Council mandate: Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Guatemala, Sierra Leone and Tajikistan, supplemented with(b) a tailored results-oriented survey of some 23 countries that are recipients of assistance from the Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery; and(c) stakeholder interviews, desk research and data collection.
The evaluation covers the work programme period 2010- 2013.
The evaluation covers the work programme period of 2010- 2013.
Internal evaluation covers both self-evaluation and in-depth evaluation(see above);
The evaluation covers the period of January 1999 to June 2007.
UNFPA evaluations cover activities funded by both regular and other resources.
This included two thematic evaluations as well as 33 project evaluations covering 37 individual projects.
The evaluation covers the two components of the cooperation agreement: the"UNIDO desks" component and the"joint private sector development" component.
The evaluation covers all phases in the review process and, based on the most important findings and conclusions, ends with a series of recommendations addressed to the ECE EPR secretariat.
The evaluation covers the period since 2000 and the scope included all UNDP interventions in a country, including both upstream and downstream activities.
The evaluation covers the period from 2006(the year before"Delivering as one" started) to 2011.
The evaluation covers seven countries- Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam- that surround the South China Sea and are eligible for GEF grants.