Примеры использования Fifth committee could на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Under-Secretary-General had also pointed out that the Fifth Committee could review and revisit the measures taken.
He felt that the Fifth Committee could easily accept the modest amount originally requested by the Secretary-General.
He urged the Secretariat to provide explanatory, substantive and analytical information so thatthe Advisory Committee and the Fifth Committee could take an intelligent decision on the issue.
The CHAIRMAN said that the Fifth Committee could decide whether or not to submit such a request.
If it proved impossible to make do with the number of vehicles authorized,the Secretariat would draw attention to that fact in its performance report when the time came so that the Fifth Committee could take a decision.
The Fifth Committee could, however, recommend the allocation to a mission of an amount lower than that proposed by the Secretary-General.
There was still some tension among the staff on the issue, but the Fifth Committee could easily resolve the matter by approving one additional official holiday per year.
The Fifth Committee could only adopt a resolution on the translation of the documents issued by the secretariat of the Conference, not the documents submitted by Member States.
However, information should be provided on the time taken to implement the recommendations so that the Fifth Committee could clearly determine the priority being given to that important activity.
The Fifth Committee could respond to that call by addressing the issues before it in a flexible, mature and responsible manner with a view to strengthening the United Nations.
The Advisory Committee should give priority to consideration of the performance report so that the Fifth Committee could take up the item again at the earliest opportunity in the forthcoming regular session.
Lastly, the Fifth Committee could rest assured that the arrangements proposed by the Advisory Committee respected the integrity of United Nations budgetary and administrative rules.
The most recent Security Council resolutions andthe report of the Secretary-General consistently spoke of nine such centres, and the Fifth Committee could only agree to the financing of what had been politically mandated.
The Fifth Committee could of course take whatever action it saw fit, but the result might be to reduce the capacity of ICC to meet the demands made upon it. See A/C.5/47/SR.32, paras. 38 and 49.
With respect to section 26D,he urged the Secretariat to distribute the report of the Secretary-General on the reform of the Secretariat procurement services as soon as possible so that the Fifth Committee could consider the request for additional posts.
Yet the Committee had worked in accordance with its mandate and the Fifth Committee could save a lot of time and energy by recommending that the General Assembly should adopt the proposed modifications without another debate.
However, the most appropriate forum for consideration of the issue was the Committee on Contributions, andher delegation hoped that the requests would be passed on to that Committee so that the Fifth Committee could have the benefit of its views.
Instead, the Fifth Committee could consider adopting guidelines and procedures to facilitate the consideration of requests for exemption, such as deadlines for their submission and details on the information to be included.
He hoped that the members of the Committee on Contributions would resolve their disagreement concerning the final figures for Member States' shares of global GNP so that the Fifth Committee could agree on a scale of assessments for the regular budget.
The Joint Coordinating Committee had taken that step so that the Fifth Committee could focus solely on the financial aspects involved in the strengthening of the Department of Political Affairs, rather than on political matters beyond its purview.
It took note of the proposal to delete all references to staff representation and to treat that issue under a different item, andhoped that, under those conditions, the Fifth Committee could approve the Secretary-General's proposal without further delay.
He feared that the Committee was"putting the wagon before the ox" and wondered how the Fifth Committee could make an informed decision before it had an opportunity to study the comprehensive assessment requested in General Assembly resolution 57/190.
Referring to paragraph 18 of the Secretary-General's report(A/54/96),he said that it was his delegation's understanding that the Committee would have to endorse decision 3/COP/2 of the Conference of the Parties so that the Fifth Committee could take the necessary decisions regarding the budget.
It would be helpful if the Fifth Committee could finalize during the current part of the resumed session any policy statements and guidelines relating to the report so that the Advisory Committee could incorporate them into its consideration of the proposed programme budget at the second part of the resumed session.
Thus, the Committee on Contributions had had to decide what informationshould be annexed to its reports; however, the Fifth Committee could specifically request the inclusion of any further information which it considered necessary.
Mr. Barriga(Liechtenstein) said that while much work remained,the 1 January 2009 target for putting in place the new system of administration of justice was realistic if the Committee could finalize the work on the draft statutes swiftly, so that the Fifth Committee could deal with all remaining issues.
The Fifth Committee could contribute to the further development of that cross-cutting initiative through its deliberations on the administrative and budgetary aspects of the project, including the issues raised by the Advisory Committee in its report(A/67/583), in particular the need to prepare guidance on the responsibilities of the United Nations system global focal points, create flexibility in terms of changing the mix of civilian capacity and further develop the proposal for an emergency staff deployment facility.
Mr. MSELLE(Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions)said that delay in the consideration of programme budget implications in the Fifth Committee could also delay General Assembly action on reports submitted to it by the various intergovernmental bodies.
The Group noted the Advisory Committee's intention to review the budgets for new missions, including UNMISET and UNOCI, at the Assembly's fifty-ninth session and urged the Secretariat to provide it with revised budget documents andall requested information early in that session, so that the Fifth Committee could then review all the budgets together before the end of October 2004.
Mrs. GOICOCHEA(Cuba) said that the recommendations of the Eleventh Meeting of Experts on the United Nations Programme in Public Administration and Finance(E/1994/56)should be considered by the Second Committee so that the Fifth Committee could take action on them during its consideration of the programme budget for the biennium 1996-1997.