Примеры использования His delegation believed that it на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
His delegation believed that it was an inadvertent error.
On the issue of jurisdiction, his delegation believed that it should be based on State consent.
His delegation believed that it was very important not to change the Statute of the Court as adopted.
As it was essential for the tribunal to be totally independent, his delegation believed that it should not be an organ of the United Nations.
His delegation believed that it was preferable not to combine the two concepts in any way.
The court must enjoy full legitimacy,and for that reason his delegation believed that it must be set up on the basis of an international treaty.
His delegation believed that it was also incompatible with the protection of the basic human right to life.
As for the definition of an international organization, his delegation believed that it should be confined to intergovernmental organizations.
His delegation believed that it was very dangerous to renegotiate matters which had already been agreed in other forums.
While some took the view that the Court's establishment would render universal jurisdiction obsolete, his delegation believed that it remained a legitimate principle.
His delegation believed that it was high time to initiate negotiations on an international legally binding instrument.
The long-standing cooperation between his country andUNIDO had been very fruitful, and his delegation believed that it should be further strengthened, particularly at the present time.
His delegation believed that it could not be reasonably denied that Taiwan constituted an exceptional situation.
However, while recognizing the usefulness of the concept proposed by the Commission, his delegation believed that it would be overly optimistic to convene immediately a conference of plenipotentiaries to consider the draft statute.
His delegation believed that it was vitally important to strengthen the safety of United Nations and associated personnel.
Draft article 52 concerned the invocation of responsibility by a State oran international organization other than an injured State or organization, and his delegation believed that it was pertinent to the question of countermeasures.
Lastly, his delegation believed that it would have been more logical to define"watercourse" first and then"international watercourse.
The request to comply with international human rights instruments was directed only at those States in which the death penalty had not been abolished, whereas his delegation believed that it should be addressed to all Member States, regardless of whether or not they had the death penalty.
His delegation believed that it was necessary during the current session to consolidate, to the extent possible, resolutions dealing with similar issues.
On the question of convening a high-level conference on international terrorism, his delegation believed that it would not be appropriate until the negotiations on the draft convention had been completed; he accordingly urged that they be completed during the current session of the General Assembly.
His delegation believed that it was important to actively seek the opinion of host countries and strive for consensus in that process.
With regard to article 19, his delegation believed that it was appropriate to give IAEA a certain role to play because it already had a well established information network.
His delegation believed that it was incumbent on Member States to provide additional funding for salary increases, despite the financial crisis.
While the text was not perfect, his delegation believed that it was the best possible compromise, and would pave the way to better protection and promotion of the rights of indigenous peoples.
His delegation believed that it was totally unacceptable for any action to be taken in Jerusalem that would adversely affect the city.
As to the form the draft Code should take, his delegation believed that it should be incorporated in the statute of an international criminal court, provided that doing so would not unduly delay completion of the work.
His delegation believed that it was imperative that all measures should be taken to ensure that special rapporteurs did not exceed the limits of their mandates.
His delegation believed that it was correct for the definition to include the element of intent, which would also make it possible to distinguish between legal acts and political acts.
However, his delegation believed that it had weakened multilateralism, at least temporarily, and might trigger an even more pronounced shift away from multilateralism.
His delegation believed that it should not respond to what the representative of Rwanda had said at the 34th meeting; his defamatory statements had become too frequent.