Примеры использования Improving international environmental на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He also called on UNEP to provide inputs on the green economy andto continue its work on improving international environmental governance.
Takes note of the set of options for improving international environmental governance identified by the consultative group; which is set out in the annex to the present decision;
One of the major policy priorities for improved environmental sustainability is, therefore, improving international environmental governance.
They are important for improving international environmental governance in the short term, but, to achieve the objectives and functions identified by the Belgrade Process, they will be insufficient.
In this context, the Joint Inspection Unit report is seen as a valuable contribution to such ongoing initiatives,which are focused on improving international environmental governance.
The aim of the session, he said, was to explore ways to respond coherently to the findings of GEO-4,particularly with regard to improving international environmental governance through innovative approaches to communication and information sharing, in which there was potential for multilateral environmental agreements to play a major role.
Emphasizing that stable, predictable and adequate funding is a prerequisite for improved governance and should constitute a central aspect of deliberations on improving international environmental governance.
First, they could take a decision on the appropriate institutional arrangements for improving international environmental governance based on the broader institutional reform options identified in the Belgrade Process and the Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome as a contribution to the strengthening of the institutional framework for sustainable development.
Two representatives said that coordination with the United Nations system on environmental matters andinternational environmental governance were inextricably linked and that improving international environmental governance was now seen in the context of United Nations reform.
By its decision SS. XI/1, the Governing Council invited the President of the Governing Council to transmit the set of options for improving international environmental governance identified by the consultative group of ministers or highlevel representatives established pursuant to decision 25/4 of 20 February 2009 to the General Assembly at its sixty-fourth session as an input to the continuing process of improving international environmental governance.
The Governing Council invited the Preparatory Committee, in its consideration of the institutional framework for sustainable development, to consider the options for broader institutional reform identified in the Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome,as a contribution to strengthening the institutional framework for sustainable development by improving international environmental governance.
Ministers participating in various sessions of the UNEP Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum have expressed a strong interest in improving international environmental policies to maximize the benefits of globalization while minimizing the negative impacts.
Invites the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, in its consideration of the institutional framework for sustainable development,to consider the options for broader institutional reform identified in the Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome as a contribution to strengthening the institutional framework for sustainable development by improving international environmental governance;
Pursuant to decision SS. XI/1, this document provides the report of the Executive Director on incremental changes in the set of options for improving international environmental governance resulting from the Belgrade Process and in consultation with the Committee of Permanent Representatives.
XI/4. I have the honour to invite your attention to UNEP 's Governing Council decision SS. XI/1* on international environmental governance adopted on 26 February 2010 at its eleventh special session,and decision 25/4 on international environmental governance adopted on 20 February 2009 by its twenty-fifth session in 2009,** which had established a consultative group of ministers or high-level representatives to present a set of options for improving international environmental governance.
By its decision 25/4, the Governing Council had established a consultative group of ministers or high-level representatives,which it had requested to present a set of options for improving international environmental governance to the Governing Council/ Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its eleventh special session in February 2010.
As the themes of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development emerged in March 2010 the debate on international environmental governance increasingly focused on the need to place it in the context of sustainable development; at its twenty-sixth session the UNEP Governing Council accordingly invited the Preparatory Committee for the Conference to"consider the options for broader institutional reform identified in the Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome,as a contribution to strengthening the institutional framework for sustainable development by improving international environmental governance.
We appreciate the work of the consultative group of ministers orhighlevel representatives in presenting a set of options for improving international environmental governance and welcome the establishment of a process to be led by ministers or their high-level representatives to address international environmental governance reforms further.
The work of that group, which has come to be known as the"Belgrade Process" in reference to the site of its first meeting, resulted in the identification of some objectives and functions of an international environmental governance system andthe elaboration of a"set of options for improving international environmental governance", which were presented to the Governing Council at its eleventh special session.
By its decision 26/1, on international environmental governance, the Governing Council invited the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, in its consideration of the institutional framework for sustainable development, to consider the options for broader institutional reform identified in the Nairobi-Helsinki Outcome of the ConsultativeGroup of Ministers or High-level Representatives on International Environmental Governance as a contribution to strengthening the institutional framework for sustainable development by improving international environmental governance.
The Governing Council of UNEP had discussed the report at its twenty-fifth session and had established a consultative group of ministers or high-level representatives,which it had requested to present a set of options for improving international environmental governance to the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its eleventh special session, with a view to providing inputs to the General Assembly.
The Consultative Group's work builds upon that of an earlier consultative group of ministers or their high-level representatives(established by Governing Council decision 25/4), known as the"Belgrade Process", which resulted in the identification of some objectives and functions of an international environmental governance system andthe development of a set of options for improving international environmental governance, which was presented to the Governing Council at its eleventh special session.
Taking note of United Nations Environment Programme Governing Council decision 25/4 of February 2009,by which the Governing Council established a consultative group of ministers or high-level representatives, with the purpose of preparing a set of options for improving international environmental governance for the consideration of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its eleventh special session, with a view to providing inputs to the United Nations General Assembly.
Recalling its decision 25/4 of 20 February 2009, on international environmental governance, in which it established a consultative group of ministers or highlevel representatives that in accordance with its mandate presented a set of options for improving international environmental governance to the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its eleventh special session, with a view to providing inputs to the General Assembly.
Taking note of decision 25/4 of 20 February 2009 of the Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme, by which the Governing Councilestablished a consultative group of ministers or high-level representatives, with the purpose of preparing a set of options for improving international environmental governance for the consideration of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its eleventh special session, with a view to providing inputs to the General Assembly.
How does each option improve international environmental governance, including the ability to respond to country needs?
Strengthening the current system offers many opportunities to improve international environmental governance and should be part of the discussion;
Deliberations on improved international environmental governance should result in a strengthened UNEP, where all countries are entitled to participate on an equal basis;
One of his goals had been to strive to improve international environmental governance, and the consensus developed and endorsed by the World Summit had been a critical first step.
The need to have a more specific text clarifying what is needed to improve international environmental governance, and particularly with regard to UNEP and its reform and strengthening process.