Примеры использования International environmental governance system на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Strengthening the international environmental governance system: functions and system-wide responses.
Maintain the principle of shared butdifferentiated responsibility in a strengthened international environmental governance system;
The current international environmental governance system either cannot meet- or has problems in meeting- the development challenges that we face today.
There would, however, be more scope for addressing financial fragmentation in the international environmental governance system.
How can a more coherent international environmental governance system better help to achieve sustainable development at the national level?
Additional topics for discussion at the event might include the green economy,water-related issues and reform of the international environmental governance system.
How do we develop an international environmental governance system that encourages developed countries to honour their commitments regarding official development assistance?;?
They said that the Conference on Sustainable Development could provide an excellent opportunity andframework for changing the current international environmental governance system.
As has been argued in the present paper, the international environmental governance system is complementary to and supportive of sustainable development as a whole, including all three pillars.
Some countries stated that although gradualsteps are very important, we must consider a broader vision of reform for the United Nations' international environmental governance system.
Institutional arrangements must not only strengthen the international environmental governance system but also be responsive to regional and national priorities, needs and capacities.
The Convention had to focus on its own institutions in order to keep them effective, butshould also examine its role within the international environmental governance system.
Two proposals have evolved from the discussions on improving the international environmental governance system as part of the broader effort to reform the overarching framework for sustainable development.
It is emphasized that there is a need to make a fresh start in the discourse andto inspire a new generation of thinkers to achieve sustainable development and an international environmental governance system to deliver on it;
A reformed, stronger and more effective international environmental governance system, and a stronger global environment organization, need to rely on a series of underlying"principles" and have certain characteristics.
In this respect,some countries stated that despite the fact that gradual progress is very important a broader vision of reform to the United Nations international environmental governance system should be considered.
He welcomed the ongoing informal consultative process on the international environmental governance system, which called for more ambitious reform and should transform UNEP into the United Nations Environment Organization.
Strengthening work at the regional and national levels to foster Environmental Sustainability is essential and this needs to be fully exploited within a reformed international environmental governance system.
Increased space in a reformed international environmental governance system, for participation by major groups and stakeholders, and civil society, including through the strengthening of the application of Rio Principle 10.
The Belgrade Process was guided by the principle that form should follow function and produced the objectives andcorresponding functions for an international environmental governance system in the context of environmental sustainability and sustainable development.
There is a need to put in place promptly a strengthened international environmental governance system, with a strong mandate and political visibility, able to fulfil the key functions that are needed to address the environmental challenges that the world faces today.
Beyond a short-term focus on its own institutions so as tokeep them effective, the Convention must now carefully examine the role it can play within the international environmental governance system and focus on its strengths.
At the same time, the United Nations is also responsible for making progress in strengthening the international environmental governance system and for enhancing the efficiency and coherence of the systems responses to the challenges of protecting the environment.
The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development presents an opportunity, perhaps greater than any other since the Conference on the Human Environment took place in Stockholm in 1972,to strengthen the international environmental governance system.
The option of regular consolidated appeals for financial support for capacitybuilding in developing countries by the international environmental governance system, including for the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements, could also be given attention.
While there was consensus that the international environmental governance system was suffering from a lack of coherence and a deficit in the implementation of what had been agreed to by the international community, there were differing views on how to fix the problem.
This could be done, building on the General Assembly resolution by which UNEP was established, through another resolution of the General Assembly transforming UNEP into a more authoritative body equipped to play the necessary coordinating andanchoring role in the international environmental governance system.
There is support for strengthening the international environmental governance system within the framework of the United Nations and recognition that there is a need to upgrade UNEP, particularly in terms of its ability to assist countries in the implementation of multilateral environmental agreements;
The high-level consultative process on broader international environmental governance reform established by the Governing Council in its decision SS. XI/1 of 26 February 2010 has led to several proposals to strengthen andimprove coherence in the international environmental governance system.
From the consultative process subsequently developed to improve the international environmental governance system, it was expressed that Costa Rica's initiative to call for a ministerial meeting in order to exchange first impressions and observations regarding the draft resolution was timely and appropriate.