Примеры использования It notes that the author на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It notes that the author has not agreed to waive the confidentiality clause.
In particular, it notes that the author never acknowledged any of the charges laid against him and still continues to deny them.
It notes that the author engaged in two separate judicial paths between 1992 and 2007.
In the present case, it notes that the author submitted his communication on 23 September 1999, relating to events occurring between July 1996 and August 1998.
It notes that the author invoked article 2, paragraph 3, in conjunction with article 26 of the Covenant.
However, it notes that the author has not provided any evidence of a violation of that article.
It notes that the author seeks to apply the obligations under the Convention in an extraterritorial manner.
It notes that the author and her family arrived in Denmark on 5 September 2009 and applied for asylum on 8 September 2009.
It notes that the author was allowed to petition the trial judge to examine the witnesses.
It notes that the author has submitted a copy of his son's appeal to the Supreme Court, where these allegations are invoked directly.
It notes that the author had chosen to appeal only to the Supreme Court, and, therefore, failed to exhaust all domestic remedies.
It notes that the author was convicted for not complying with his obligations under the civil service, which he had freely chosen.
It notes that the author has provided detailed information on the methods of torture as well as a medical report to corroborate his claims.
It notes that the author does not invoke any financial difficulties preventing him from paying the deposit within the set time limit.
It notes that the author appealed to the Investigation Chamber of the Court of Appeal of Riom for rectification of factual error and release.
It notes that the author may still appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council by way of petition for special leave to appeal.
It notes that the author did not provide any evidence in support of her allegation with regard to the impartiality of the members of the Council of State.
It notes that the author and the State party concur that the punishment consisted in confinement of the prisoner to his cell for 23 hours a day.
It notes that the author has not displayed any indication of partiality towards his former firm, or that he retains a commonality of interest with the firm.
It notes that the author made all reasonable attempts to challenge the length of his prison sentence, including before the Criminal Division of the Court of Cassation.
It notes that the author says that he was transferred in February 1994 to the Tamanrasset camp, where he was detained incommunicado until 23 November 1995.
It notes that the author submitted this document incomplete to the Swedish Migration Board and that, therefore, it has not been able to provide a full copy of this document.
It notes that the author has not explained why exactly he, personally, needed the information in question; rather, he contended that this was a"matter of public interest.
It notes that the author was hospitalized from 3 to 13 June 2005 and stresses that his statement that he was in a"pre-heart attack" state is incorrect.
It notes that the author has not presented sufficient and concrete information or explanations on the alleged violation of his rights under the above provisions of the Covenant.
It notes that the author was arrested when his wife was eight months pregnant and that he was the sole breadwinner of the family, which placed a considerable financial burden on them.
It notes that the author himself is responsible for the production of such a plan and chose not to attend certain rehabilitation programmes which would have been an important preliminary step in this process.
It notes that the author was convicted for not complying with his obligations under the civil service freely chosen by him and that he never before objected to the duration of the service.
It notes that the author was a member of several revolutionary groups of Marxist and Maoist inspiration, which had conspired to overthrow several Governments in West Africa, including in Guinea-Bissau, Gambia and Senegal.
It notes that the author has not explained why he could not have returned from his holiday to attend the hearing or how his rights were violated if a request for postponement was rejected in the absence of serious circumstances.